Suppr超能文献

基于卷积神经网络的白癜风诊断方法的设计与评估

Design and Assessment of Convolutional Neural Network Based Methods for Vitiligo Diagnosis.

作者信息

Zhang Li, Mishra Suraj, Zhang Tianyu, Zhang Yue, Zhang Duo, Lv Yalin, Lv Mingsong, Guan Nan, Hu Xiaobo Sharon, Chen Danny Ziyi, Han Xiuping

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 18;8:754202. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.754202. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Today's machine-learning based dermatologic research has largely focused on pigmented/non-pigmented lesions concerning skin cancers. However, studies on machine-learning-aided diagnosis of depigmented non-melanocytic lesions, which are more difficult to diagnose by unaided eye, are very few. We aim to assess the performance of deep learning methods for diagnosing vitiligo by deploying Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and comparing their diagnosis accuracy with that of human raters with different levels of experience. A Chinese in-house dataset (2,876 images) and a world-wide public dataset (1,341 images) containing vitiligo and other depigmented/hypopigmented lesions were constructed. Three CNN models were trained on close-up images in both datasets. The results by the CNNs were compared with those by 14 human raters from four groups: expert raters (>10 years of experience), intermediate raters (5-10 years), dermatology residents, and general practitioners. F1 score, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), specificity, and sensitivity metrics were used to compare the performance of the CNNs with that of the raters. For the in-house dataset, CNNs achieved a comparable F1 score (mean [standard deviation]) with expert raters (0.8864 [0.005] vs. 0.8933 [0.044]) and outperformed intermediate raters (0.7603 [0.029]), dermatology residents (0.6161 [0.068]) and general practitioners (0.4964 [0.139]). For the public dataset, CNNs achieved a higher F1 score (0.9684 [0.005]) compared to the diagnosis of expert raters (0.9221 [0.031]). Properly designed and trained CNNs are able to diagnose vitiligo without the aid of Wood's lamp images and outperform human raters in an experimental setting.

摘要

如今,基于机器学习的皮肤病学研究主要集中在与皮肤癌相关的色素沉着/无色素沉着病变上。然而,关于机器学习辅助诊断色素脱失性非黑素细胞病变(这类病变仅凭肉眼更难诊断)的研究却非常少。我们旨在通过部署卷积神经网络(CNN)来评估深度学习方法诊断白癜风的性能,并将其诊断准确性与不同经验水平的人类评估者进行比较。构建了一个包含白癜风及其他色素脱失/色素减退性病变的中国内部数据集(2876张图像)和一个全球公共数据集(1341张图像)。在这两个数据集中,对三个CNN模型进行了特写图像训练。将CNN的结果与来自四组的14名人类评估者的结果进行比较:专家评估者(经验超过10年)、中级评估者(5 - 10年)、皮肤科住院医师和全科医生。使用F1分数、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、特异性和敏感性指标来比较CNN与评估者的性能。对于内部数据集,CNN获得了与专家评估者相当的F1分数(均值[标准差])(0.8864[0.005]对0.8933[0.044]),并且优于中级评估者(0.7603[0.029])、皮肤科住院医师(0.6161[0.068])和全科医生(0.4964[0.139])。对于公共数据集,与专家评估者的诊断结果(0.9221[0.031])相比,CNN获得了更高的F1分数(0.9684[0.005])。经过合理设计和训练的CNN能够在不借助伍德灯图像的情况下诊断白癜风,并且在实验环境中表现优于人类评估者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d9/8558218/5f59b92334f9/fmed-08-754202-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验