• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

企业对含糖饮料征税的回应:对“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销回应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”一文的评论

Companies' Responses to a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Implications for Research Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".

机构信息

School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Nova School of Business and Economics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7619. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7619. Epub 2022 Dec 6.

DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7619
PMID:37579464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10125064/
Abstract

The paper by Forde et al, newly published in this journal, sheds light on how sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) companies may react to the introduction of a SSB tax. This commentary goes over the paper's main findings and drafts implications for research on the impacts of SSB taxes. First and foremost, future research needs to assess the actual impacts of SSB taxes on companies' actions, especially reformulation. Second, cross-country research, comparing large companies with similar beverage portfolios, could bring insights about the impacts of external factors, including different SSB taxes, on companies' decisions. Third, SSB companies' actions are potential confounders in empirical studies looking into the impacts of SSB taxes on prices, demand, or other outcomes. Researchers need to be aware of and discuss such aspects thoroughly in their studies, as the implications for the interpretation of results are evident.

摘要

福特等人在本刊新发表的论文阐明了含糖饮料(SSB)公司可能对 SSB 税出台的反应。这篇述评概述了该论文的主要发现,并就 SSB 税影响的研究提出了一些启示。首先,未来的研究需要评估 SSB 税对公司行为的实际影响,尤其是对产品配方的影响。其次,具有类似饮料产品组合的跨国公司的比较研究可以深入了解外部因素(包括不同的 SSB 税)对公司决策的影响。第三,SSB 公司的行为是实证研究中 SSB 税对价格、需求或其他结果影响的潜在混杂因素。研究人员在研究中需要意识到并充分讨论这些方面,因为结果解释的影响是显而易见的。

相似文献

1
Companies' Responses to a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Implications for Research Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".企业对含糖饮料征税的回应:对“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销回应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”一文的评论
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7619. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7619. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
2
Additional Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".对含糖饮料征税的额外营销应对措施评论“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销应对措施:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7638. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7638. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
3
Should We Worry About Spillover Effects of Sugar Sweetened Beverage Taxation Policies? Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".我们是否应该担心含糖饮料税收政策的溢出效应?评“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销反应:英国 2019 年的一项定性访谈研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7793. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7793. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
4
The Instrumental Role of Strategic Communication to Counter Industry Marketing Responses to Sugary Drink Taxes Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".战略沟通在对抗含糖饮料税的行业营销反应中的工具性作用 述评:“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销反应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7685. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7685. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
5
Framing Marketing Responses to National Regulation: The Four Ps in Transnational Corporate Political Discourse Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".对国家监管的营销回应进行框架构建:跨国公司政治话语中的 4Ps 评论“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销回应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7618. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7618. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
6
Projected health and economic impacts of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Germany: A cross-validation modelling study.德国含糖饮料征税对健康和经济的预估影响:交叉验证模型研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Nov 21;20(11):e1004311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004311. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Assessing the impact of the Barbados sugar-sweetened beverage tax on beverage sales: an observational study.评估巴巴多斯含糖饮料税对饮料销售的影响:一项观察性研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jan 30;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0776-7.
8
Outcomes Following Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.对含糖饮料征税的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215276. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15276.
9
Marketing Responses to the Taxation of Soft Drinks Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".对“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销反应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”的评论:软饮料税收的营销反应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7612. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7612. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
10
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Low back pain trends attributable to high body mass index over the period 1990-2021 and projections up to 2036.1990年至2021年期间归因于高体重指数的腰痛趋势及至2036年的预测。
Front Nutr. 2025 Jan 21;11:1521567. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1521567. eCollection 2024.
2
Is Reformulation Still a Suitable Goal for Sugary Beverage Taxes? A Response to Recent Commentaries.重新配方仍然是含糖饮料税的合适目标吗?对近期评论的回应。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:8366. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8366. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes Following Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.对含糖饮料征税的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215276. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15276.
2
Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019.理解对含糖饮料征税的市场反应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2618-2629. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.5465. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
3
Brown sugar, how come you taste so good? The impact of a soda tax on prices and consumption.红糖,怎么会这么甜?苏打税对价格和消费的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;264:113332. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113332. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国软饮料行业征税的宣布和实施对英国 2015-19 年软饮料的含糖量、价格、产品规格和种类的影响:一项基于控制的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 11;17(2):e1003025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003025. eCollection 2020 Feb.
5
Sugar-based beverage taxes and beverage prices: Evidence from South Africa's Health Promotion Levy.含糖饮料税和饮料价格:来自南非健康促进税的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;238:112465. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112465. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
The Economics of Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Review of the Effects on Prices, Sales, Cross-Border Shopping, and Consumption.含糖饮料征税的经济学分析:对价格、销售、跨境购物和消费影响的综述。
Annu Rev Nutr. 2019 Aug 21;39:317-338. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-082018-124603. Epub 2019 May 22.