• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Instrumental Role of Strategic Communication to Counter Industry Marketing Responses to Sugary Drink Taxes Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".战略沟通在对抗含糖饮料税的行业营销反应中的工具性作用 述评:“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销反应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7685. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7685. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
Should We Worry About Spillover Effects of Sugar Sweetened Beverage Taxation Policies? Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".我们是否应该担心含糖饮料税收政策的溢出效应?评“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销反应:英国 2019 年的一项定性访谈研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7793. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7793. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
3
Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019.理解对含糖饮料征税的市场反应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2618-2629. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.5465. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
Additional Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".对含糖饮料征税的额外营销应对措施评论“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销应对措施:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7638. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7638. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
Framing Marketing Responses to National Regulation: The Four Ps in Transnational Corporate Political Discourse Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".对国家监管的营销回应进行框架构建:跨国公司政治话语中的 4Ps 评论“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销回应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7618. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7618. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
6
Contextual Factors That May Impact on the Development and Implementation of the Sugary Drinks Policy Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".可能影响含糖饮料政策制定和实施的背景因素 述评:“了解对含糖饮料征税的营销反应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7713. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7713. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
7
Companies' Responses to a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Implications for Research Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".企业对含糖饮料征税的回应:对“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销回应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”一文的评论
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7619. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7619. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
8
Marketing Responses to the Taxation of Soft Drinks Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".对“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销反应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”的评论:软饮料税收的营销反应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7612. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7612. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
9
Policy vs Business: Well-Designed Health-Related Food Policy Should Not Let Industry Marketing Undermine its Intended Effects Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".政策与商业:精心设计的与健康相关的食品政策不应让行业营销破坏其预期效果——述评“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销反应:英国的定性访谈研究,2019 年”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7640. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7640. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
10
Corporate Harm Minimisation: Promises and Perils Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".企业危害最小化:承诺与风险 述评“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销应对措施:英国 2019 年的定性访谈研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7649. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7649. Epub 2023 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Reformulation Still a Suitable Goal for Sugary Beverage Taxes? A Response to Recent Commentaries.重新配方仍然是含糖饮料税的合适目标吗?对近期评论的回应。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:8366. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8366. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
How the "Are We Drinking Ourselves Sick?" Communication Campaign Built Support for Policy Action on Sugary Drinks in Jamaica.《“我们是否喝出了病?”宣传活动如何在牙买加为含糖饮料政策行动争取支持》。
Nutrients. 2022 Jul 13;14(14):2866. doi: 10.3390/nu14142866.
2
Outcomes Following Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.对含糖饮料征税的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215276. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15276.
3
Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019.理解对含糖饮料征税的市场反应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2618-2629. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.5465. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
Evidence of a health risk 'signalling effect' following the introduction of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax.引入含糖饮料税后健康风险“信号效应”的证据。
Food Policy. 2021 Jul;102:102104. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102104.
5
Tobacco industry pricing strategies in response to excise tax policies: a systematic review.烟草业应对消费税政策的定价策略:系统评价。
Tob Control. 2023 Mar;32(2):239-250. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056630. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
6
Is the Association Between Beverage Taxes and Reductions in Sales Driven by Communication of Health Consequences in Addition to Price Increases?除了价格上涨之外,饮料税与销售额下降之间的关联是否是由健康后果的宣传所推动的?
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2032537. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32537.
7
Retailer perspectives on sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in the California Bay Area.零售商对加利福尼亚湾区含糖饮料税的看法。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 May 28;19:101129. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101129. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
Results of a Mass Media Campaign in South Africa to Promote a Sugary Drinks Tax.南非大众媒体宣传含糖饮料税的结果。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 23;12(6):1878. doi: 10.3390/nu12061878.
9
The Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois: Lessons From a Failed Effort.伊利诺伊州库克县的含糖饮料税:失败的教训。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jul;110(7):1009-1016. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305640. Epub 2020 May 21.
10
The Politics of Taxes for Health: An Analysis of the Passage of the Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Mexico.税收与健康的政治学:墨西哥含糖饮料税通过历程分析。
Health Syst Reform. 2020;6(1):e1669122. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2019.1669122.

战略沟通在对抗含糖饮料税的行业营销反应中的工具性作用 述评:“理解对含糖饮料征税的营销反应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究”。

The Instrumental Role of Strategic Communication to Counter Industry Marketing Responses to Sugary Drink Taxes Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".

机构信息

Policy Advocacy and Communication Division, Vital Strategies, New York City, NY, USA.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7685. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7685. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7685
PMID:37579428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10125093/
Abstract

Strong sugary drink taxes are effective at reducing sugary drinks consumption. In response, the sugary drinks industry employs various marketing strategies to undermine the taxes to protect and maintain its customer base. In their recent article in this journal, Forde et al present a framework for understanding how sugary drinks companies use marketing for this purpose. In this commentary, we reflect on this framework by drawing from recent experiences of sugary drinks industry marketing responses. Further, we review the global evidence on the instrumental role that strategic communication can play in protecting strong taxes from industry responses. We make a case for strategic communication as a vital tool in promoting and protecting sugary drinks tax proposals, both prior to and after their introduction.

摘要

强力征收含糖饮料税可有效降低含糖饮料的消费。对此,含糖饮料行业采用了各种营销策略来破坏这些税收,以保护和维持其客户群。在他们最近发表在该期刊上的文章中,Forde 等人提出了一个理解含糖饮料公司如何将营销用于此目的的框架。在这篇评论中,我们通过借鉴含糖饮料行业营销应对的最新经验,对该框架进行了反思。此外,我们还回顾了全球证据,证明了战略沟通在保护强有力的税收免受行业反应方面所起的重要作用。我们认为,战略沟通是在提出和引入含糖饮料税后促进和保护其税收建议的重要工具。