Suppr超能文献

儿童急性重度哮喘的雾化吸入器与雾化器治疗比较

Comparison of Nebuhaler and nebulizer treatment of acute severe asthma in children.

作者信息

Fuglsang G, Pedersen S

出版信息

Eur J Respir Dis. 1986 Aug;69(2):109-13.

PMID:3758239
Abstract

In a double-blind, cross-over study, 21 children with acute severe asthma were treated with terbutaline (0.10 mg/kg) delivered by a pressurized aerosol with a 750 ml spacer (Nebuhaler) or as a nebulized solution by a Pari Inhalier Boy. A significant increase in FEV-1 was seen after both treatments. Furthermore, nebuhaler treatment resulted in significantly greater bronchodilation than treatment with the nebulizer (p less than 0.05). Irritation of mouth and throat and coughing were observed in 12 patients during nebuhaler treatment. These problems were not seen when the nebulizer was used. Eleven children preferred treatment with the nebuhaler, whereas only one child preferred the nebulizer. The main reason for preferring the nebuhaler was the shorter administration time.

摘要

在一项双盲交叉研究中,21名急性重症哮喘患儿接受了特布他林治疗(0.10毫克/千克),一种是通过带有750毫升储雾罐(Nebuhaler)的压力气雾剂给药,另一种是通过百瑞雾化吸入器(Pari Inhalier Boy)以雾化溶液形式给药。两种治疗后第一秒用力呼气量(FEV-1)均显著增加。此外,储雾罐治疗导致的支气管扩张显著大于雾化器治疗(p小于0.05)。在储雾罐治疗期间,12名患者出现口腔和咽喉刺激以及咳嗽。使用雾化器时未出现这些问题。11名儿童更喜欢储雾罐治疗,而只有1名儿童更喜欢雾化器治疗。更喜欢储雾罐的主要原因是给药时间较短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验