• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进社区参与脊髓损伤研究:一个案例

Promoting community engagement in spinal cord injury research: a case example.

作者信息

Biller Olivia M, Biundo Jason, Mitchell Edward S-L, Richardson Bonnie, Burkhart Ian, Kim Rachel Y, Gerhardt Nicole M, Mulcahey M J

机构信息

Center for Outcomes and Measurement, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2023 Nov;61(11):632-635. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00926-x. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1038/s41393-023-00926-x
PMID:37591948
Abstract

Community engagement is an important method of knowledge translation in spinal cord injury (SCI) research where researchers collaborate with people with lived experience, care partners, and other research users to improve the quality of research. This perspective article aims to promote community engagement in SCI research by describing useful resources for its implementation and providing an example project using the North American Spinal Cord Injury Consortium (NASCIC) process for such partnerships. Researchers from the Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences' (JCRS) Center for Outcomes and Measurement engaged NASCIC to create an advisory committee composed of four people living with SCI to make recommendations for the methods of a large-scale study to develop a clinical outcome assessment. The advisory committee made usable recommendations for enhancing recruitment methods and reducing burden and barriers to participation. The successful partnership between NASCIC and JCRS shows the feasibility and value of SCI community engagement in research.

摘要

社区参与是脊髓损伤(SCI)研究中知识转化的重要方法,研究人员与有实际生活经验的人、护理伙伴及其他研究用户合作,以提高研究质量。这篇观点文章旨在通过描述实施社区参与的有用资源,并提供一个使用北美脊髓损伤协会(NASCIC)流程建立此类伙伴关系的示例项目,来促进SCI研究中的社区参与。杰斐逊康复科学学院(JCRS)结果与测量中心的研究人员邀请NASCIC成立了一个由四名脊髓损伤患者组成的咨询委员会,为一项大规模研究的方法提供建议,以制定临床结果评估。咨询委员会就加强招募方法以及减轻参与负担和障碍提出了可行的建议。NASCIC与JCRS之间的成功合作表明了SCI社区参与研究的可行性和价值。

相似文献

1
Promoting community engagement in spinal cord injury research: a case example.促进社区参与脊髓损伤研究:一个案例
Spinal Cord. 2023 Nov;61(11):632-635. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00926-x. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
2
Co-designing approaches to enhance falls management after spinal cord injury in an Australian spinal injuries unit.在澳大利亚一家脊髓损伤治疗机构中,共同设计提升脊髓损伤后跌倒管理的方法。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Aug;72(4):e70037. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70037.
3
Assistive technology in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: use or non-use? Understanding what happens post-discharge in tetraplegic individuals at a rehabilitation centre in Northeast Brazil.脊髓损伤康复中的辅助技术:使用还是不使用?了解巴西东北部一家康复中心四肢瘫痪患者出院后的情况。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Aug;20(6):1700-1710. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2471482. Epub 2025 Mar 2.
4
Development of a machine learning model and a web application for predicting neurological outcome at hospital discharge in spinal cord injury patients.开发用于预测脊髓损伤患者出院时神经功能结局的机器学习模型和网络应用程序。
Spine J. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.005.
5
Physiotherapist- and peer-led physical activity counseling for people with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study of barriers and facilitators to implementation in the rehabilitation to community transition.物理治疗师和同伴主导的脊髓损伤患者身体活动咨询:一项关于康复至社区过渡阶段实施障碍与促进因素的横断面研究
Physiother Theory Pract. 2025 Sep;41(9):1901-1913. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2025.2484610. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
6
Advancing equity in cancer research through principled partnership: stakeholder engagement practices in The Social Interventions for Support during Treatment for Endometrial cancer and Recurrence (SISTER) Study.通过有原则的伙伴关系推进癌症研究中的公平性:子宫内膜癌治疗及复发期间支持性社会干预(SISTER)研究中的利益相关者参与实践
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 8;11(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00760-w.
7
Engagement of People With Lived Experience in Spinal Cord Injury to Address Innovation Priorities.让脊髓损伤患者参与进来以确定创新重点。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70369. doi: 10.1111/hex.70369.
8
A Web-based systematic review on traumatic spinal cord injury comparing the "citation classics" with the consumers' perspectives.一项基于网络的关于创伤性脊髓损伤的系统评价:比较“经典文献”与消费者观点。
J Neurotrauma. 2006 Feb;23(2):156-69. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.156.
9
Management of faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases.成人中枢神经系统疾病患者粪便失禁和便秘的管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 13;2014(1):CD002115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002115.pub5.
10
Management of faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases.成人中枢神经系统疾病患者大便失禁和便秘的管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 18(12):CD002115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002115.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Engagement of People With Lived Experience in Spinal Cord Injury to Address Innovation Priorities.让脊髓损伤患者参与进来以确定创新重点。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70369. doi: 10.1111/hex.70369.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP).评估利益相关者参与度:以利益相关者为中心的工具制定流程(SCIP)。
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Oct;43(10):949-961. doi: 10.1177/01939459211004274. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Meeting Proceedings for SCI 2020: Launching a Decade of Disruption in Spinal Cord Injury Research.2020 年 SCI 会议记录:开启脊髓损伤研究的颠覆十年。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 May 1;38(9):1251-1266. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7174. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
3
Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership.
在合作中进行和传播脊髓损伤研究的综合知识转化指导原则。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):656-663. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.393. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
4
Engagement science: The core of dissemination, implementation, and translational research science.参与式科学:传播、实施及转化研究科学的核心
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 20;4(3):216-218. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.8.
5
The Continuum of Community Engagement in Research: A Roadmap for Understanding and Assessing Progress.研究中社区参与的连续统一体:理解与评估进展的路线图。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(4):427-434. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0064.