Suppr超能文献

2015年至2018年期间,来自英国单一直升机紧急医疗服务机构的所有病因院前插管中的动脉血二氧化碳分压与呼气末二氧化碳分压梯度。

The PaCO-ETCO gradient in pre-hospital intubations of all aetiologies from a single UK helicopter emergency medicine service 2015-2018.

作者信息

Hibberd Owen, Hazlerigg Antonia, Cocker Paul John, Wilson Alastair W, Berry Neil, Harris Tim

机构信息

East Anglian Air Ambulance, Cambridge, UK.

Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Feb;23(1):11-19. doi: 10.1177/1751143720970356. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Control of the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO) is important in the ventilated patient. End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO) levels are often used as a proxy, but are clinically limited. The difference between the PaCO and ETCO has been suggested to be 0.5-1.0 kPa. However, this has not been consistently reflected in the physiologically unstable pre-hospital patient. This study aims to elucidate the PaCO-ETCO gradient for pre-hospital intubated patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, cohort study using data identified from the HEMSbase 2 database (Feb 2015-Nov 2018). Patients were included if they had documented ETCO and arterial PaCO measurements. Arterial PaCO data that could not be linked to within 5 minutes of ETCO were excluded. Bland-Altman plots were calculated to describe agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients were identified. Aetiology was arranged into three categories: 13 (17.8%) medical, 22 (30.1%) traumatic and 38 (52.1%) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The median PaCO-ETCO gradient was 2.0 [1.3-3.1] kPa. A PaCO-ETCO gradient of 0-1 kPa was seen for only 11 (15.1%) of total patients. The Bland-Altman agreement for all aetiologies was more than the accepted gradient of 0-1 kPa with the largest bias and widest limits of agreement seen for OHCA (-3.2 [0.3 - -6.8]).

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of the differences between the ETCO and PaCO, levels of variation and inability to predict this suggest that ETCO is not a suitable surrogate upon which to base ventilatory settings in conditions where pH or PaCO require precise control.

摘要

背景

控制动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)对接受机械通气的患者至关重要。呼气末二氧化碳(ETCO₂)水平常被用作替代指标,但在临床应用中存在局限性。有研究表明,PaCO₂与ETCO₂的差值为0.5 - 1.0 kPa。然而,这一差异在生理状态不稳定的院前患者中并未得到一致体现。本研究旨在阐明院前插管患者的PaCO₂ - ETCO₂梯度。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用从HEMSbase 2数据库(2015年2月至2018年11月)中识别的数据。纳入记录了ETCO₂和动脉血PaCO₂测量值的患者。排除与ETCO₂测量时间间隔超过5分钟的动脉血PaCO₂数据。通过计算Bland - Altman图来描述一致性。

结果

共纳入73例患者。病因分为三类:内科疾病13例(17.8%)、创伤22例(30.1%)和院外心脏骤停(OHCA)38例(52.1%)。PaCO₂ - ETCO₂梯度的中位数为2.0 [1.3 - 3.1] kPa。仅11例(15.1%)患者的PaCO₂ - ETCO₂梯度为0 - 1 kPa。所有病因的Bland - Altman一致性均超过公认的0 - 1 kPa梯度,其中OHCA的偏差最大,一致性界限最宽(-3.2 [0.3 - -6.8])。

结论

ETCO₂与PaCO₂之间差异的大小、变化程度以及无法进行预测表明,在需要精确控制pH值或PaCO₂的情况下,ETCO₂并非确定通气设置的合适替代指标。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验