Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ Lyon, Univ Jean Monnet, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, Saint-Etienne, France; Thuasne, BP243, 92307 Levallois-Perret, Cedex, France.
Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, service de médecine physique et réadaptation - CHU-Saint Etienne, Lyon1, Université Savoie Mont-Blanc, Laboratoire Inter Universitaire de biologie de la Motricité, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2023 Aug;108:106070. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106070. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
Although impairments in dorso-lumbar spine mobility have been previously reported in patients with low back pain, its exact mechanism is not yet clear. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate and compare spinal kinematics between subjects with and without low back pain and identify appropriate tools to evaluate it.
The PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant literature. The search strategy was mainly focused on studies investigating lumbar kinematics in subjects with and without low back pain during clinical functional tests, gait, sports and daily functional activities. Papers were selected if at least one of these outputs was reported: lumbar range of motion, lumbar velocity, lumbar acceleration and deceleration, lordosis angle or lumbar excursion.
Among 804 papers, 48 met the review eligibility criteria and 29 were eligible to perform a meta-analysis. Lumbar range of motion was the primary outcome measured. A statistically significant limitation of the lumbar mobility was found in low back pain group in all planes, and in the frontal and transverse planes for thoracic range of motion, but there is no significant limitation for pelvic mobility. The amount of limitation was found to be more important in the lumbar sagittal plane and during challenging functional activities in comparison with simple activities.
The findings of this review provide insight into the impact of low back pain on spinal kinematics during specific movements, contributing to our understanding of this relationship and suggesting potential clinical implications.
尽管先前有研究报道腰痛患者存在腰背脊柱活动度受损,但确切机制尚不清楚。因此,本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在调查和比较腰痛患者与无腰痛患者的脊柱运动学,并确定评估脊柱运动学的合适工具。
在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中搜索相关文献。搜索策略主要集中在研究腰痛患者和无腰痛患者在临床功能测试、步态、运动和日常功能活动中腰椎运动学的研究。如果至少有以下一个输出报告,则选择论文:腰椎活动度、腰椎速度、腰椎加速度和减速度、腰椎前凸角或腰椎活动度。
在 804 篇论文中,有 48 篇符合综述纳入标准,有 29 篇符合进行荟萃分析的标准。腰椎活动度是主要的测量结果。在所有平面、在胸段活动度的额状面和横状面,腰痛组的腰椎活动度存在统计学上显著受限,但在骨盆活动度方面没有显著受限。与简单活动相比,在腰椎矢状面和在具有挑战性的功能活动中,限制的程度更为重要。
本综述的结果深入了解了腰痛对特定运动中脊柱运动学的影响,有助于我们理解这种关系,并提示了潜在的临床意义。