Suppr超能文献

使用外部负荷或自愿用力的等长方案对训练有素的女性跳跃高度提升的效果。

The effectiveness of isometric protocols using an external load or voluntary effort on jump height enhancement in trained females.

机构信息

Unit of Biostructure, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, al. I.J. Paderewskiego 35, 51-612, Wrocław, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 19;13(1):13535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40912-0.

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of isometric post-activation performance enhancement protocols using an external load (EXL) or voluntary effort (VE) on jump height (JH) in trained females divided into EXL (n = 15), VE (n = 14), and control (CON; n = 12) groups. JH was assessed using countermovement jumps at baseline and the third, fifth, seventh, and ninth minutes after the protocols. The EXL performed three sets of back squats with a 70%-repetition maximum load for four seconds, with one-minute breaks. The VE performed three sets of pushing against an immovable bar in the back squat position for five seconds, with one-minute breaks. The CON group ran on a treadmill at 6 km/h for four minutes. A RM-ANOVA showed a significant interaction for group-time (p < 0.01). The EXL protocol provided JH improvement at the third minute compared to baseline (p = 0.01), though it decreased in subsequent minutes (p < 0.05). JH declined in the VE group at the third and fifth minutes (p < 0.05), then peaked, surpassing baseline, after nine minutes (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between the protocols in the relative effect (best-baseline) (p = 0.09), though the EXL group appeared to gain more (effect size [ES] = 0.76). Both protocols improved JH, but caution is required due to peak performance time and potential JH reduction.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在训练有素的女性中,使用外部负荷(EXL)或自主努力(VE)的等长激活后增强方案对跳跃高度(JH)的影响,将女性分为 EXL(n=15)、VE(n=14)和对照组(CON;n=12)。JH 使用基线和方案后第 3、5、7 和 9 分钟的反跳跳进行评估。EXL 进行三组后深蹲,每组重复最大负荷的 70%,持续 4 秒,每组之间休息 1 分钟。VE 进行三组在深蹲位置推不动的杠,每组持续 5 秒,每组之间休息 1 分钟。CON 组在跑步机上以 6km/h 的速度跑 4 分钟。RM-ANOVA 显示组间时间存在显著交互作用(p<0.01)。与基线相比,EXL 方案在第 3 分钟时提供了 JH 的改善(p=0.01),但在随后的几分钟内下降(p<0.05)。VE 组在第 3 和第 5 分钟时 JH 下降(p<0.05),然后在第 9 分钟时达到峰值,超过基线(p=0.04)。两个方案之间的相对效应(最佳基线)(p=0.09)没有显著差异,但 EXL 组似乎获得了更多的提升(效果大小[ES] = 0.76)。两个方案都改善了 JH,但由于峰值表现时间和潜在的 JH 下降,需要谨慎使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2da/10439930/b4b6979ef0a6/41598_2023_40912_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验