Unit of Biostructure, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, al. I.J. Paderewskiego 35, 51-612, Wrocław, Poland.
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 19;13(1):13535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40912-0.
This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of isometric post-activation performance enhancement protocols using an external load (EXL) or voluntary effort (VE) on jump height (JH) in trained females divided into EXL (n = 15), VE (n = 14), and control (CON; n = 12) groups. JH was assessed using countermovement jumps at baseline and the third, fifth, seventh, and ninth minutes after the protocols. The EXL performed three sets of back squats with a 70%-repetition maximum load for four seconds, with one-minute breaks. The VE performed three sets of pushing against an immovable bar in the back squat position for five seconds, with one-minute breaks. The CON group ran on a treadmill at 6 km/h for four minutes. A RM-ANOVA showed a significant interaction for group-time (p < 0.01). The EXL protocol provided JH improvement at the third minute compared to baseline (p = 0.01), though it decreased in subsequent minutes (p < 0.05). JH declined in the VE group at the third and fifth minutes (p < 0.05), then peaked, surpassing baseline, after nine minutes (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between the protocols in the relative effect (best-baseline) (p = 0.09), though the EXL group appeared to gain more (effect size [ES] = 0.76). Both protocols improved JH, but caution is required due to peak performance time and potential JH reduction.
本研究旨在探讨在训练有素的女性中,使用外部负荷(EXL)或自主努力(VE)的等长激活后增强方案对跳跃高度(JH)的影响,将女性分为 EXL(n=15)、VE(n=14)和对照组(CON;n=12)。JH 使用基线和方案后第 3、5、7 和 9 分钟的反跳跳进行评估。EXL 进行三组后深蹲,每组重复最大负荷的 70%,持续 4 秒,每组之间休息 1 分钟。VE 进行三组在深蹲位置推不动的杠,每组持续 5 秒,每组之间休息 1 分钟。CON 组在跑步机上以 6km/h 的速度跑 4 分钟。RM-ANOVA 显示组间时间存在显著交互作用(p<0.01)。与基线相比,EXL 方案在第 3 分钟时提供了 JH 的改善(p=0.01),但在随后的几分钟内下降(p<0.05)。VE 组在第 3 和第 5 分钟时 JH 下降(p<0.05),然后在第 9 分钟时达到峰值,超过基线(p=0.04)。两个方案之间的相对效应(最佳基线)(p=0.09)没有显著差异,但 EXL 组似乎获得了更多的提升(效果大小[ES] = 0.76)。两个方案都改善了 JH,但由于峰值表现时间和潜在的 JH 下降,需要谨慎使用。