Suppr超能文献

胸椎硬膜外阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞用于多根肋骨骨折患者镇痛的安全性和有效性比较:一项单盲、随机对照试验的初步研究

Comparison of safety and efficacy of thoracic epidural block and erector spinae plane block for analgesia in patients with multiple rib fractures: A pilot single-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Singh Swati, Avinash Raja, Jaiswal Shreyas, Kumari Anita

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;67(7):614-619. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_844_21. Epub 2023 Jul 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pain associated with rib fractures is challenging to manage. This pilot trial aimed to assess the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) for controlling pain associated with multiple rib fractures.

METHODS

This randomised, single-blinded, controlled pilot study was conducted on trauma patients who had three or more rib fractures and had been admitted at a tertiary care centre. The study was conducted after receiving ethical approval and trial registration. Patients were randomised into two groups: TEA and ESPB, from February 2019 to February 2020. In the ESPB group, a unilateral or bilateral catheter was inserted in the erector spinae space, and an infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine was started. In the TEA group, the thoracic epidural catheter was inserted, and 0.125% bupivacaine infusion was started. Rescue analgesia using intravenous morphine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered if the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was >3 for 48 hours postoperatively. The primary endpoint was total morphine consumption after administration of ESPB and TEA in patients with a rib fracture.

RESULTS

Forty patients completed the study, with 20 in each group. Total morphine consumption by patients in the ESPB group was 5.38 ± 2.6 mg per 48 hours, and by those in the TEA group was 5.22 ± 2.11 mg per 48 hours ( = 0.883). Thirty minutes after starting the infusion, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 64.8 ± 2.1 mmHg in the ESPB group and 57.2 ± 1.3 mmHg in the TEA group ( = 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Total morphine consumption was not statistically different in this pilot trial among the two groups. ESP block may provide similar analgesia with better haemodynamic stability compared to TEA in patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures.

摘要

背景与目的

肋骨骨折相关疼痛的管理具有挑战性。这项试点试验旨在评估竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)与胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)相比,在控制多发性肋骨骨折相关疼痛方面的疗效。

方法

本随机、单盲、对照试点研究针对在三级医疗中心就诊的有三根或更多肋骨骨折的创伤患者进行。该研究在获得伦理批准和试验注册后开展。2019年2月至2020年2月期间,患者被随机分为两组:TEA组和ESPB组。在ESPB组,于竖脊肌间隙插入单侧或双侧导管,并开始输注0.125%布比卡因。在TEA组,插入胸段硬膜外导管,并开始输注0.125%布比卡因。如果术后48小时视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分>3,则使用静脉注射吗啡(0.1mg/kg)进行补救镇痛。主要终点是肋骨骨折患者接受ESPB和TEA后总的吗啡消耗量。

结果

40例患者完成研究,每组20例。ESPB组患者每48小时总的吗啡消耗量为5.38±2.6mg,TEA组为5.22±2.11mg(P=0.883)。开始输注30分钟后,ESPB组平均动脉压(MAP)为64.8±2.1mmHg,TEA组为57.2±1.3mmHg(P=0.00001)。

结论

在这项试点试验中,两组间总的吗啡消耗量无统计学差异。对于多发性创伤性肋骨骨折患者,与TEA相比,ESPB阻滞可能提供相似的镇痛效果且血流动力学稳定性更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b02d/10436724/de31a38611fa/IJA-67-614-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验