Al-Tashi Qasem, Saad Maliazurina B, Sheshadri Ajay, Wu Carol C, Chang Joe Y, Al-Lazikani Bissan, Gibbons Christopher, Vokes Natalie I, Zhang Jianjun, Lee J Jack, Heymach John V, Jaffray David, Mirjalili Seyedali, Wu Jia
Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Jun 28;4(8):100777. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100777. eCollection 2023 Aug 11.
Survival models exist to study relationships between biomarkers and treatment effects. Deep learning-powered survival models supersede the classical Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) model, but substantial performance drops were observed on high-dimensional features because of irrelevant/redundant information. To fill this gap, we proposed SwarmDeepSurv by integrating swarm intelligence algorithms with the deep survival model. Furthermore, four objective functions were designed to optimize prognostic prediction while regularizing selected feature numbers. When testing on multicenter sets (n = 1,058) of four different cancer types, SwarmDeepSurv was less prone to overfitting and achieved optimal patient risk stratification compared with popular survival modeling algorithms. Strikingly, SwarmDeepSurv selected different features compared with classical feature selection algorithms, including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), with nearly no feature overlapping across these models. Taken together, SwarmDeepSurv offers an alternative approach to model relationships between radiomics features and survival endpoints, which can further extend to study other input data types including genomics.
生存模型用于研究生物标志物与治疗效果之间的关系。深度学习驱动的生存模型取代了经典的Cox比例风险(CoxPH)模型,但由于无关/冗余信息,在高维特征上观察到显著的性能下降。为了填补这一空白,我们通过将群体智能算法与深度生存模型相结合,提出了群体深度生存模型(SwarmDeepSurv)。此外,还设计了四个目标函数来优化预后预测,同时对选定的特征数量进行正则化。在对四种不同癌症类型的多中心数据集(n = 1058)进行测试时,与流行的生存建模算法相比,群体深度生存模型更不容易过拟合,并实现了最佳的患者风险分层。引人注目的是,与经典特征选择算法(包括最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO))相比,群体深度生存模型选择了不同的特征,这些模型之间几乎没有特征重叠。综上所述,群体深度生存模型为研究放射组学特征与生存终点之间的关系提供了一种替代方法,该方法可以进一步扩展到研究包括基因组学在内的其他输入数据类型。