• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高植物毒性研究的严谨性和实用性:推荐资源。

Improving the rigor and utility of botanical toxicity studies: Recommended resources.

机构信息

Amway Corporation, Buena Park, California, USA.

Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Oct;144:105471. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105471. Epub 2023 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105471
PMID:37604297
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10591999/
Abstract

Interest in botanicals, particularly as dietary supplement ingredients, is growing steadily. This growth, and the marketing of new ingredients and combination products as botanical dietary supplements, underscores the public health need for a better understanding of potential toxicities associated with use of these products. This article and accompanying template outline the resources to collect literature and relevant information to support the design of botanical toxicity studies. These resources provide critical information related to botanical identification, characterization, pre-clinical and clinical data, including adverse effects and interactions with pharmaceuticals. Toxicologists using these resources should collaborate with pharmacognosists and/or analytical chemists to enhance knowledge of the botanical material being tested. Overall, this guide and resource list is meant to help locate relevant information that can be leveraged to inform on decisions related to toxicity testing of botanicals, including the design of higher quality toxicological studies.

摘要

人们对植物药的兴趣与日俱增,尤其是将其作为膳食补充剂的成分。这种增长,以及新成分和组合产品作为植物药膳食补充剂的营销,凸显了公众对更好地了解使用这些产品相关潜在毒性的需求。本文和附带的模板概述了收集文献和相关信息的资源,以支持植物毒性研究的设计。这些资源提供了与植物鉴定、特征描述、临床前和临床数据相关的关键信息,包括不良反应和与药物的相互作用。毒理学家使用这些资源时,应与生药学专家和/或分析化学家合作,以增强对正在测试的植物材料的了解。总的来说,本指南和资源清单旨在帮助找到相关信息,以便为植物毒性测试的决策提供信息,包括更高质量毒理学研究的设计。

相似文献

1
Improving the rigor and utility of botanical toxicity studies: Recommended resources.提高植物毒性研究的严谨性和实用性:推荐资源。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Oct;144:105471. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105471. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
2
Risk assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use in food and food supplements: emerging issues.用于食品和食品补充剂的植物药及植物制剂的风险评估:新出现的问题。
Toxicol Lett. 2008 Aug 15;180(2):131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.024. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
3
Adverse effects of plant food supplements and botanical preparations: a systematic review with critical evaluation of causality.植物性食品补充剂和植物制剂的不良反应:一项对因果关系进行批判性评估的系统评价
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;79(4):578-92. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12519.
4
The Botanical Safety Consortium: A public-private partnership to enhance the botanical safety toolkit.植物药安全性联盟:加强植物药安全性工具包的公私合作伙伴关系。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;128:105090. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105090. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
5
In silico approach to safety of botanical dietary supplement ingredients utilizing constituent-level characterization.利用成分水平表征对植物性膳食补充剂成分安全性进行计算机模拟研究的方法。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Sep;107(Pt A):418-429. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
6
Naturally complex: Perspectives and challenges associated with Botanical Dietary Supplement Safety assessment.天然复杂性:与植物性膳食补充剂安全性评估相关的观点和挑战。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Aug;118:963-971. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
7
Finding the bad actor: Challenges in identifying toxic constituents in botanical dietary supplements.发现不良行为者:鉴定植物性膳食补充剂中有毒成分的挑战。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Feb;124:431-438. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.12.026. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Recent studies on selected botanical dietary supplement ingredients.近期关于特定植物性膳食补充剂成分的研究。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007 Sep;389(1):27-35. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1254-7. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
9
Developing a Screening Strategy to Identify Hepatotoxicity and Drug Interaction Potential of Botanicals.制定一种筛选策略以识别植物药的肝毒性和药物相互作用潜力。
J Diet Suppl. 2025;22(1):162-192. doi: 10.1080/19390211.2024.2417679. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Botanical-induced toxicity: Liver injury and botanical-drug interactions. A report on a society of Toxicology Annual Meeting symposium.植物诱导毒性:肝损伤和草药-药物相互作用。毒理学学会年会研讨会报告。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024 Nov;153:105708. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105708. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Chemical Standardization of Milk Thistle ( L.) Extract Using UHPLC-MS/MS and the Method of Standard Addition.采用 UHPLC-MS/MS 和标准加入法对奶蓟(L.)提取物进行化学标准化。
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2024 Aug 7;35(8):1726-1732. doi: 10.1021/jasms.4c00125. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
3
Advancing botanical safety: A strategy for selecting, sourcing, and characterizing botanicals for developing toxicological tools.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension.试验报告中结果报告指南:CONSORT-结果2022扩展版
JAMA. 2022 Dec 13;328(22):2252-2264. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21022.
2
Understanding plant to extract ratios in botanical extracts.了解植物提取物中的植物与提取物比例。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 30;13:981978. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.981978. eCollection 2022.
3
The Importance of Reference Materials and Method Validation for Advancing Research on the Health Effects of Dietary Supplements and Other Natural Products.
推进植物安全性:为开发毒理学工具选择、采购和鉴定植物原料的策略。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2024 Apr;186:114537. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2024.114537. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
参考材料和方法验证对推进膳食补充剂及其他天然产物健康影响研究的重要性。
Front Nutr. 2021 Dec 14;8:786261. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.786261. eCollection 2021.
4
The Botanical Safety Consortium: A public-private partnership to enhance the botanical safety toolkit.植物药安全性联盟:加强植物药安全性工具包的公私合作伙伴关系。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;128:105090. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105090. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
5
Liver injury associated with kratom, a popular opioid-like product: Experience from the U.S. drug induced liver injury network and a review of the literature.与流行的类阿片产品“咔哇潮饮”相关的肝损伤:来自美国药物性肝损伤网络的经验和文献复习。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 1;218:108426. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108426. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
6
"Natural" is not synonymous with "Safe": Toxicity of natural products alone and in combination with pharmaceutical agents.“天然”并不等同于“安全”:天然产物单独和与药物制剂联合的毒性。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Jun;113:104642. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104642. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
7
United States Pharmacopeia (USP) comprehensive review of the hepatotoxicity of green tea extracts.美国药典(USP)对绿茶提取物肝毒性的全面综述。
Toxicol Rep. 2020 Feb 15;7:386-402. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.02.008. eCollection 2020.
8
Improving natural product research translation: From source to clinical trial.提高天然产物研究翻译质量:从源头到临床试验。
FASEB J. 2020 Jan;34(1):41-65. doi: 10.1096/fj.201902143R. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
9
Clinical relevance of St. John's wort drug interactions revisited.圣约翰草药物相互作用的临床相关性再探讨。
Br J Pharmacol. 2020 Mar;177(6):1212-1226. doi: 10.1111/bph.14936. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
10
The Dietary Supplement Label Database: Recent Developments and Applications.膳食补充剂标签数据库:最新进展与应用。
J Nutr. 2018 Aug;148(Suppl 2):1428S-1435S. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy082. Epub 2018 Aug 3.