• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Advancing botanical safety: A strategy for selecting, sourcing, and characterizing botanicals for developing toxicological tools.推进植物安全性:为开发毒理学工具选择、采购和鉴定植物原料的策略。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2024 Apr;186:114537. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2024.114537. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
The Botanical Safety Consortium: A public-private partnership to enhance the botanical safety toolkit.植物药安全性联盟:加强植物药安全性工具包的公私合作伙伴关系。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;128:105090. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105090. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
Developing a Screening Strategy to Identify Hepatotoxicity and Drug Interaction Potential of Botanicals.制定一种筛选策略以识别植物药的肝毒性和药物相互作用潜力。
J Diet Suppl. 2025;22(1):162-192. doi: 10.1080/19390211.2024.2417679. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
4
Medicinal plants and their preparations in the European market: Why has the harmonization failed? The cases of St. John's wort, valerian, ginkgo, ginseng, and green tea.欧盟市场上的药用植物及其制剂:为什么统一法规失败了?圣约翰草、缬草、银杏、人参和绿茶案例。
Phytomedicine. 2021 Jan;81:153421. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153421. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
5
A proposed screening strategy for evaluating the genotoxicity potential of botanicals and botanical extracts.一种用于评估植物药和植物提取物遗传毒性潜力的拟议筛查策略。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2025 Mar;197:115277. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2025.115277. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
6
Risk assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use in food and food supplements: emerging issues.用于食品和食品补充剂的植物药及植物制剂的风险评估:新出现的问题。
Toxicol Lett. 2008 Aug 15;180(2):131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.024. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
7
In silico approach to safety of botanical dietary supplement ingredients utilizing constituent-level characterization.利用成分水平表征对植物性膳食补充剂成分安全性进行计算机模拟研究的方法。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Sep;107(Pt A):418-429. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
8
A Tiered Approach for the Evaluation of the Safety of Botanicals Used as Dietary Supplements: An Industry Strategy.用于膳食补充剂的植物药安全性评估的分层方法:产业策略。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;104(3):446-457. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1132. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
9
Chemometric-Guided Approaches for Profiling and Authenticating Botanical Materials.化学计量学引导的植物材料分析与鉴定方法
Front Nutr. 2021 Nov 26;8:780228. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.780228. eCollection 2021.
10
Plant vs. Kidney: Evaluating Nephrotoxicity of Botanicals with the Latest Toxicological Tools.植物与肾脏:使用最新毒理学工具评估植物药的肾毒性
Curr Opin Toxicol. 2022 Dec;32. doi: 10.1016/j.cotox.2022.100371. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-detector analytical approach for characterizing complex botanical extracts: a case study on ashwagandha.一种用于表征复杂植物提取物的多检测器分析方法:以印度人参为例的案例研究。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s00216-025-06006-8.
2
Principal Component Analysis Followed by Mahalanobis Distance Classification for Authentication of Berry Ingredients and Supplements via LC-MS/MS-based Anthocyanin Fingerprinting.基于液相色谱-串联质谱法的花色苷指纹图谱,采用主成分分析和马氏距离分类法对浆果成分及补充剂进行鉴别
Anal Chem. 2025 Jul 1;97(25):12971-12980. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c06037. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
3
Botanical-induced toxicity: Liver injury and botanical-drug interactions. A report on a society of Toxicology Annual Meeting symposium.植物诱导毒性:肝损伤和草药-药物相互作用。毒理学学会年会研讨会报告。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024 Nov;153:105708. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105708. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
4
Screening tools to evaluate the neurotoxic potential of botanicals: building a strategy to assess safety.用于评估植物药神经毒性潜力的筛选工具:建立评估安全性的策略。
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2024 Jul;20(7):629-646. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2024.2378895. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
5
Chemical Standardization of Milk Thistle ( L.) Extract Using UHPLC-MS/MS and the Method of Standard Addition.采用 UHPLC-MS/MS 和标准加入法对奶蓟(L.)提取物进行化学标准化。
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2024 Aug 7;35(8):1726-1732. doi: 10.1021/jasms.4c00125. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-targeted chemical analysis of consumer botanical products labeled as blue cohosh (Caulophyllum thalictroides), goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis), or yohimbe bark (Pausinystalia yohimbe) by NMR and MS.采用 NMR 和 MS 对标签为蓝升麻(Caulophyllum thalictroides)、白毛莨(Hydrastis canadensis)或育亨宾树皮(Pausinystalia yohimbe)的消费者植物产品进行非靶向化学分析。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024 Jan;416(1):175-189. doi: 10.1007/s00216-023-05004-y. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
2
Improving the rigor and utility of botanical toxicity studies: Recommended resources.提高植物毒性研究的严谨性和实用性:推荐资源。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Oct;144:105471. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105471. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
3
Best Practice in the chemical characterisation of extracts used in pharmacological and toxicological research-The ConPhyMP-Guidelines.药理学和毒理学研究中提取物化学表征的最佳实践——ConPhyMP指南。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 13;13:953205. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.953205. eCollection 2022.
4
Label compliance for ingredient verification: regulations, approaches, and trends for testing botanical products marketed for "immune health" in the United States.成分验证标签合规性:美国“免疫健康”类 marketed 植物产品的检测法规、方法和趋势。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(9):2441-2460. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2124230. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
5
Geographical location and cultivar-linked changes on chemical properties of olive oils from Algeria.阿尔及利亚橄榄油化学性质的地理位置及品种相关变化
Food Sci Nutr. 2022 Apr 21;10(6):1937-1949. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2810. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Working with the natural complexity: Selection and characterization of black cohosh root extract for use in toxicology testing.研究天然复杂性:毒理学测试中黑升麻根提取物的选择和特征描述。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Feb;160:112769. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112769. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
7
The Botanical Safety Consortium: A public-private partnership to enhance the botanical safety toolkit.植物药安全性联盟:加强植物药安全性工具包的公私合作伙伴关系。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;128:105090. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105090. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
8
Chemical Authentication of Botanical Ingredients: A Review of Commercial Herbal Products.植物成分的化学鉴定:市售草药产品综述
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 15;12:666850. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.666850. eCollection 2021.
9
Toxicology studies of green tea extract in F344/NTac rats and B6C3F1/N mice and toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of green tea extract in Wistar Han [Crl:WI(Han)] rats and B6C3F1/N mice (gavage studies).F344/NTac大鼠和B6C3F1/N小鼠中绿茶提取物的毒理学研究以及Wistar Han [Crl:WI(Han)]大鼠和B6C3F1/N小鼠中绿茶提取物的毒理学和致癌性研究(灌胃研究)
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 2016 Apr(585). doi: 10.22427/NTP-TR-585.
10
Development of the first universal mixture for use in system suitability tests for High-Performance Thin Layer Chromatography.开发首个适用于高效薄层色谱系统适用性测试的通用混合物。
J Chromatogr A. 2021 Feb 8;1638:461830. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461830. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

推进植物安全性:为开发毒理学工具选择、采购和鉴定植物原料的策略。

Advancing botanical safety: A strategy for selecting, sourcing, and characterizing botanicals for developing toxicological tools.

机构信息

Division of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Battelle, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2024 Apr;186:114537. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2024.114537. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2024.114537
PMID:38417538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11238631/
Abstract

Increases in botanical use, encompassing herbal medicines and dietary supplements, have underlined a critical need for an advancement in safety assessment methodologies. However, botanicals present unique challenges for safety assessment due to their complex and variable composition arising from diverse growing conditions, processing methods, and plant varieties. Historically, botanicals have been largely evaluated based on their history of use information, based primarily on traditional use or dietary history. However, this presumption lacks comprehensive toxicological evaluation, demanding innovative and consistent assessment strategies. To address these challenges, the Botanical Safety Consortium (BSC) was formed as an international, cross-sector forum of experts to identify fit-for purpose assays that can be used to evaluate botanical safety. This global effort aims to assess botanical safety assessment methodologies, merging traditional knowledge with modern in vitro and in silico assays. The ultimate goal is to champion the development of toxicity tools for botanicals. This manuscript highlights: 1) BSC's strategy for botanical selection, sourcing, and preparation of extracts to be used in in vitro assays, and 2) the approach utilized to characterize botanical extracts, using green tea and Asian ginseng as examples, to build confidence for use in biological assays.

摘要

植物药(包括草药和膳食补充剂)的使用增加,突出表明需要在安全性评估方法上取得进展。然而,由于植物药的组成复杂且多样,受到不同生长条件、加工方法和植物品种的影响,因此其安全性评估具有独特的挑战。历史上,植物药主要基于其使用历史信息进行评估,主要依据传统用途或饮食历史。然而,这种假设缺乏全面的毒理学评估,需要创新和一致的评估策略。为了应对这些挑战,成立了植物安全联盟(BSC),作为一个国际性的、跨部门的专家论坛,旨在确定适合评估植物药安全性的特定用途检测方法。这一全球性努力旨在评估植物药安全性评估方法,将传统知识与现代体外和计算方法相结合。最终目标是支持开发用于植物药的毒性检测工具。本文重点介绍:1)BSC 用于体外检测的植物选择、来源和提取物制备的策略,以及 2)以绿茶和亚洲人参为例,用于鉴定植物提取物特征的方法,以建立在生物检测中使用的信心。