• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期手术前老年患者使用两种握力计的比较。

Comparison of two handgrip dynamometers in older adults before elective surgery.

作者信息

Andrade Maricarmen S, Honorato Macarena P, Vargas Javiera P, de Los Angeles Galvez María, Rojas Mariana R

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, Clínica Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.

Department of Geriatrics, Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Vitacura, Chile.

出版信息

Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Aug 23;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00334-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13741-023-00334-y
PMID:37612779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10463959/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Handgrip strength is a useful measurement of muscle strength and has been proposed as a single predictor of postoperative outcomes in older adults. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation and concordance of Camry digital hand grip dynamometer (EH101) with gold standard Jamar® hydraulic handgrip dynamometer in older adults previous to elective surgery.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients ≥ 65 years old admitted to a Chilean private hospital for elective surgery between March 2018 and February 2019. Handgrip strength was assessed 2 times with each hand prior to surgery, using both the Jamar® dynamometer and the Camry digital dynamometer. The highest value of each dynamometer was used for analysis.

RESULTS

We included a total of 220 patients (mean age 73.1 years old ± 6.3). Maximal handgrip strength averaged 26.9 kg ± 9.6 with the Camry dynamometer and 26.9 kg ± 9.7 with the Jamar® dynamometer in the right hand and 25.5 kg ± 9.5 with the Camry dynamometer and 25.7 kg ± 9.2 with the Jamar® dynamometer with the left hand. The difference between both measures did not differ significantly from 0, with Pearson correlation index of 0.95 and Lin's concordance index of 0.95 (p < 0001). The Bland-Altman graphics show that 90% of the measures were inside the confidence limits, without systematic bias.

CONCLUSION

Camry digital dynamometer is an inexpensive and valid device to measure handgrip strength in older adults previous to elective surgery, compared to the gold standard Jamar® hydraulic handgrip dynamometer.

摘要

背景

握力是肌肉力量的一项有用测量指标,并且已被提议作为老年人术后结果的单一预测指标。本研究的目的是评估在择期手术前,凯美瑞数字握力计(EH101)与金标准Jamar®液压握力计在老年人中的相关性和一致性。

方法

对2018年3月至2019年2月期间入住智利一家私立医院进行择期手术的65岁及以上患者进行了一项横断面研究。在手术前,使用Jamar®测力计和凯美瑞数字测力计对每只手的握力进行了2次评估。每次测力计的最高值用于分析。

结果

我们共纳入了220例患者(平均年龄73.1岁±6.3)。右手使用凯美瑞测力计的最大握力平均为26.9千克±9.6千克,使用Jamar®测力计的为26.9千克±9.7千克;左手使用凯美瑞测力计的最大握力平均为25.5千克±9.5千克,使用Jamar®测力计的为25.7千克±9.2千克。两种测量方法之间的差异与0无显著差异,Pearson相关指数为0.95,Lin一致性指数为0.95(p<0.0001)。Bland-Altman图显示,90%的测量值在置信限内,无系统偏差。

结论

与金标准Jamar®液压握力计相比,凯美瑞数字测力计是一种在择期手术前测量老年人握力的廉价且有效的设备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/10463959/2bfd019a5272/13741_2023_334_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/10463959/81b96a68b0a2/13741_2023_334_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/10463959/2bfd019a5272/13741_2023_334_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/10463959/81b96a68b0a2/13741_2023_334_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/10463959/2bfd019a5272/13741_2023_334_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of two handgrip dynamometers in older adults before elective surgery.择期手术前老年患者使用两种握力计的比较。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Aug 23;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00334-y.
2
Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices.握力测量:两种握力计设备的横断面研究。
S Afr J Physiother. 2022 Sep 26;78(1):1768. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1768. eCollection 2022.
3
Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years.50 岁以上社区居住成年人使用两种握力计的可靠性和有效性。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03270-6.
4
A Cross-Sectional Validation Study of Camry EH101 versus JAMAR Plus Handheld Dynamometers in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Their Correlations with Bioelectrical Impedance and Nutritional Status.Camry EH101 与 JAMAR Plus 手持式测力计在结直肠癌患者中的横断面验证研究及其与生物电阻抗和营养状况的相关性。
Nutrients. 2024 Jun 11;16(12):1824. doi: 10.3390/nu16121824.
5
Comparison of Grip Strength Measurements by Widely Used Three Dynamometers in Outpatients Aged 60 Years and Over.60岁及以上门诊患者中广泛使用的三种握力计测量握力的比较。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 25;12(13):4260. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134260.
6
Prevalence of muscle weakness based on different diagnostic criteria in community-dwelling older adults: A comparison of grip strength dynamometers.基于不同诊断标准的社区居住老年人肌肉无力的患病率:握力测力计的比较。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Nov;17(11):2089-2095. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13027. Epub 2017 May 18.
7
Comparison of Jamar and Bodygrip Dynamometers for Handgrip Strength Measurement.用于测量握力的贾马尔握力计和握力计的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):1931-1940. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001666.
8
Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of Squegg™ - smart dynamometer and handgrip trainer in healthy individuals.Squegg™智能测力计和握力训练器在健康个体中的同时效度和重测信度。
Hand Ther. 2024 Jun;29(2):68-74. doi: 10.1177/17589983231223868. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
9
Study of Reliability and Validity of the Load Cell-Type Hand Dynamometer Compared to the Jamar Dynamometer and the Number of Reliable Grip Strength Measurements.《研究与握力计相比,压力传感器型握力计的可靠性和有效性,以及可靠握力测量次数。》
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2023 Oct;28(5):562-572. doi: 10.1142/S2424835523500601. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
10
The Martin Vigorimeter Represents a Reliable and More Practical Tool Than the Jamar Dynamometer to Assess Handgrip Strength in the Geriatric Patient.对于评估老年患者的握力,马丁握力计是一种比贾马尔测力计更可靠且更实用的工具。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 May 1;17(5):466.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.02.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity of Camry dynamometer for isometric hand grip strength measurement in healthy Indian adults.凯美瑞测力计在健康印度成年人等长握力测量中的可靠性和有效性。
J Hand Microsurg. 2025 Jun 10;17(4):100291. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2025.100291. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Handgrip strength as a potential indicator of aging: insights from its association with aging-related laboratory parameters.握力作为衰老的潜在指标:基于其与衰老相关实验室参数关联的见解
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 29;12:1491584. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1491584. eCollection 2025.
3
Sport participation, weight status, and physical fitness in French adolescents.

本文引用的文献

1
Handgrip strength predicts length of hospital stay in an abdominal surgical setting: the role of frailty beyond age.握力预测腹部手术住院时间:衰弱的作用超出年龄。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Apr;34(4):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02121-z. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
2
Prognostic Value of Handgrip Strength in Older Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.握力强度对老年心脏手术患者的预后价值。
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;37(11):1760-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.08.016. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
3
Hand grip strength as predictor of undernutrition in hospitalized patients with cancer and a proposal of cut-off.
法国青少年的运动参与、体重状况和体能。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec;183(12):5213-5221. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05796-w. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
4
Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and the clinical outcome of the older inpatients with COVID-19 infection: a prospective observational study.肌肉减少症、肌少症性肥胖与 COVID-19 感染老年住院患者的临床结局:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 4;24(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05177-w.
5
A Cross-Sectional Validation Study of Camry EH101 versus JAMAR Plus Handheld Dynamometers in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Their Correlations with Bioelectrical Impedance and Nutritional Status.Camry EH101 与 JAMAR Plus 手持式测力计在结直肠癌患者中的横断面验证研究及其与生物电阻抗和营养状况的相关性。
Nutrients. 2024 Jun 11;16(12):1824. doi: 10.3390/nu16121824.
6
Detraining and Retraining Effects from a Multicomponent Training Program on the Functional Capacity and Health Profile of Physically Active Prehypertensive Older Women.多组分训练计划对身体活跃的高血压前期老年女性功能能力和健康状况的去训练和再训练效果
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 21;12(2):271. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020271.
手握力作为癌症住院患者营养不良的预测指标及切点建议
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2020 Oct;39:210-214. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Handgrip strength and health outcomes: Umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies.握力与健康结局:对观察性研究系统评价的荟萃分析进行伞式综述。
J Sport Health Sci. 2021 May;10(3):290-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
5
Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment.亚洲肌少症工作组:2019年肌少症诊断与治疗共识更新
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):300-307.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
6
Grip strength mediates the relationship between muscle mass and frailty.握力在肌肉质量与虚弱之间起中介作用。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Apr;11(2):441-451. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12510. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
7
Grip Strength: An Indispensable Biomarker For Older Adults.握力:老年人不可或缺的生物标志物。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Oct 1;14:1681-1691. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S194543. eCollection 2019.
8
Global variation in grip strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis of normative data.握力的全球差异:规范性数据的系统评价与荟萃分析
Age Ageing. 2016 Mar;45(2):209-16. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv192. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
9
Prognostic value of handgrip strength in people aged 60 years and older: A systematic review and meta-analysis.60岁及以上人群握力的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Jan;16(1):5-20. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12508. Epub 2015 May 28.
10
Preoperative muscle weakness as defined by handgrip strength and postoperative outcomes: a systematic review.术前握力定义的肌肉无力与术后结果:系统评价。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2012 Jan 17;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-12-1.