Zhao Yulin, Zhang Binglei, Yuan Baisheng
Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No. 758 Hefei Road, Qingdao 266035, China.
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 11;13(8):1189. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081189.
Cervical sagittal balance plays a pivotal role in spine surgeries as it has a significant impact on the clinical outcomes in cervical spine surgery. Image processing techniques have significantly improved the accuracy and precision of cervical surgical techniques. This study aims to investigate the effects of T1 slope (T1s) on the disappearance of cervical lordosis after posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty using medical informatics and radiographic measures. To do so, we determined and measured the loss of T1s and cervical lordosis during the postoperative follow-up period in patients with double-door posterior cervical laminoplasty. Patients (n = 40) who underwent posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty participated in this study. For all patients, the difference between the preoperative T1s (angle between the upper edge of T1 and the horizontal line) and preoperative and postoperative cervical lordosis (Cobb method) was estimated, and the linear relationship between the two was statistically analyzed to observe the influence of preoperative T1s on postoperative cervical lordosis disappearance. The average preoperative T1s was 23.54°, and the average preoperative cervical lordosis angle was 8.50°. After 1-20 months of follow-up (mean = 9.53 months), the average postoperative cervical lordosis was 8.50°, and the average loss of cervical lordosis was 0.22°. Twenty cases had different degrees of lordosis angle loss after the operation, with an average loss of 9.31°. All patients were divided into groups A and B, according to a mean value of T1s = 23.54°, of which T1S > 23.54° was group A and T1s < 23.54 was group B. Cervical lordosis was quantified by the C2-C7 Cobb angle. The Cobb angle difference of cervical lordosis was measured before and after the operation, and its correlation with preoperative T1s was assessed. The preoperative Cobb angle and cervical curvature changes in the two groups were statistically compared, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( < 0.05). The group with a T1s > 23.54° had greater loss of preoperative Cobb angle and cervical curvature. In group A, the mean preoperative cervical disability index (NDI) was 32.4 ± 3.4, and the mean postoperative NDI score was 16.5 ± 2.1. The mean preoperative VAS scores of neck pain and neck pain were 5.41 ± 1.1 and 5.55 ± 0.3, respectively, and the improvement in neck pain was -0.2%. The mean preoperative NDI in group B was 30.1 ± 2.9, and the mean postoperative NDI score was 11.5 ± 3.1. The mean VAS score for preoperative neck pain was 5.11 ± 1.2, that for postoperative neck pain was 4.18 ± 0.7, and that for neck pain improved by 18%. There was a significant difference between the two groups ( < 0.05). The disappearance of cervical lordosis after posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty is an important cause of postoperative cervical spine pain. The T1s is meaningful for predicting the loss of postoperative curvature in patients undergoing posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty. This is especially true for patients with good preoperative cervical curvature without ankylosis and kyphosis but with a wide T1s.
颈椎矢状面平衡在脊柱手术中起着关键作用,因为它对颈椎手术的临床结果有重大影响。图像处理技术显著提高了颈椎手术技术的准确性和精确性。本研究旨在利用医学信息学和影像学测量方法,探讨T1斜率(T1s)对颈椎后路双开门椎板成形术后颈椎生理前凸消失的影响。为此,我们在接受双开门颈椎后路椎板成形术患者的术后随访期间,测定并测量了T1s和颈椎生理前凸的丢失情况。40例行颈椎后路双开门椎板成形术的患者参与了本研究。对所有患者,估计术前T1s(T1上缘与水平线之间的角度)与术前及术后颈椎生理前凸(Cobb法)之间的差异,并对两者之间的线性关系进行统计学分析,以观察术前T1s对术后颈椎生理前凸消失的影响。术前T1s平均为23.54°,术前颈椎生理前凸角平均为8.50°。随访1 - 20个月(平均9.53个月)后,术后颈椎生理前凸平均为8.50°,颈椎生理前凸平均丢失0.22°。20例患者术后有不同程度的生理前凸角丢失,平均丢失9.31°。根据T1s = 23.54°的均值将所有患者分为A组和B组,其中T1S > 23.54°为A组,T1s < 23.54为B组。颈椎生理前凸通过C2 - C7 Cobb角进行量化。测量手术前后颈椎生理前凸的Cobb角差异,并评估其与术前T1s的相关性。对两组术前Cobb角和颈椎曲度变化进行统计学比较,两组间差异有统计学意义(< 0.05)。T1s > 23.54°组术前Cobb角和颈椎曲度丢失更大。A组术前颈椎功能障碍指数(NDI)平均为32.4 ± 3.4,术后NDI平均评分为16.5 ± 2.1。术前颈部疼痛和颈部疼痛的VAS平均评分分别为5.41 ± 1.1和5.55 ± 0.3,颈部疼痛改善率为 - 0.2%。B组术前NDI平均为30.1 ± 2.9,术后NDI平均评分为11.5 ± 3.1。术前颈部疼痛VAS评分为5.11 ± 1.2,术后颈部疼痛VAS评分为4.18 ± 0.7,颈部疼痛改善率为18%。两组间差异有统计学意义(< 0.05)。颈椎后路双开门椎板成形术后颈椎生理前凸的消失是术后颈椎疼痛的重要原因。T1s对预测接受颈椎后路双开门椎板成形术患者术后曲度丢失有意义。对于术前颈椎曲度良好、无强直和后凸但T1s较宽的患者尤其如此。