• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越患者的患者身份:对加拿大关节炎患者顾问委员会中患者研究伙伴参与经历的叙述分析。

A patienthood that transcends the patient: An analysis of patient research partners' narratives of involvement in a Canadian arthritis patient advisory board.

机构信息

Graduate Programs in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2024 Jan;29(1):22-30. doi: 10.1177/13558196231197288. Epub 2023 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1177/13558196231197288
PMID:37632271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10729530/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Incorporating the perspectives of patients and public into the conduct of research has the potential to make scientific research more democratic. This paper explores how being a patient partner on an arthritis patient advisory board shapes the patienthood of a person living with arthritis.

METHODS

An analysis was undertaken of the narratives of 22 patient research partners interviewed about their experiences on the Arthritis Patient Advisory Board (APAB), based in Vancouver, Canada.

RESULTS

Participants' motivations to become involved in APAB stemmed largely from their desire to change their relationship with their condition. APAB was a living collective project in which participants invested their hope, both for their own lives as patients and for others with the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight how the journeys of patient partners connect and integrate seemingly disparate conceptions of what it means to be a patient. One's experience as a clinical 'patient' transforms into the broader notion of civic patienthood.

摘要

目的

将患者和公众的观点纳入研究的实施过程中,有可能使科学研究更加民主。本文探讨了作为关节炎患者咨询委员会的患者伙伴,如何塑造一个患有关节炎的人的患者身份。

方法

对 22 名接受采访的关节炎患者研究伙伴的叙述进行了分析,这些伙伴参与了位于加拿大温哥华的关节炎患者咨询委员会(APAB)。

结果

参与者参与 APAB 的动机主要源于他们改变与病情关系的愿望。APAB 是一个充满活力的集体项目,参与者在这里投入了希望,不仅是为了自己作为患者的生活,也为了其他患有这种疾病的人。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了患者伙伴的经历如何将看似不同的患者身份概念联系和整合在一起。一个人作为临床“患者”的经历转化为更广泛的公民患者身份概念。

相似文献

1
A patienthood that transcends the patient: An analysis of patient research partners' narratives of involvement in a Canadian arthritis patient advisory board.超越患者的患者身份:对加拿大关节炎患者顾问委员会中患者研究伙伴参与经历的叙述分析。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2024 Jan;29(1):22-30. doi: 10.1177/13558196231197288. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
2
'Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life Benefits and risks in patient partner-researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners' experiences in a Canadian health research setting.在已然忙碌的生活中增添另一个旋转的盘子:患者-伙伴-研究者关系中的益处与风险:对加拿大健康研究环境下患者伙伴经历的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e022154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022154.
3
Evolution of a research team: the patient partner perspective.研究团队的演变:患者合作伙伴视角
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 24;8(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00377-3.
4
Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study.探索患者及护理者对患者伴侣角色意义的认知:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 28;9(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00511-9.
5
Engagement of people with lived experience of dementia advisory group and cross-cutting program: reflections on the first year.让患有痴呆症的人参与咨询小组和跨部门项目:第一年的反思
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 25;8(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00359-5.
6
Involving Patient Partners in the KRESCENT Peer Review: Intent, Process, Challenges, and Opportunities.让患者伙伴参与KRESCENT同行评审:目的、过程、挑战与机遇
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022 Nov 15;9:20543581221136402. doi: 10.1177/20543581221136402. eCollection 2022.
7
Using qualitative Health Research methods to improve patient and public involvement and engagement in research.运用定性健康研究方法,改善患者及公众对研究的参与度。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 13;4:49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0129-8. eCollection 2018.
8
Re-Envisioning the Canadian Nephrology Trials Network: A Can-SOLVE-CKD Stakeholder Meeting of Patient Partners and Researchers.重新构想加拿大肾脏病试验网络:患者合作伙伴与研究人员的加拿大慢性肾脏病解决方案(Can-SOLVE-CKD)利益相关者会议
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021 Jul 14;8:20543581211030396. doi: 10.1177/20543581211030396. eCollection 2021.
9
The dynamic nature of patient engagement within a Canadian patient-oriented kidney health research network: Perspectives of researchers and patient partners.加拿大以患者为导向的肾脏健康研究网络中患者参与的动态性质:研究人员和患者伙伴的观点。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):905-918. doi: 10.1111/hex.13716. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
10
Establishing patient partners' roles on research teams: a scoping review.确定患者合作伙伴在研究团队中的角色:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Dec 18;10(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00664-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying potential barriers and solutions to patient partner compensation (payment) in research.识别患者参与研究的伙伴补偿(支付)方面的潜在障碍及解决方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 23;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00341-1.
2
Collective forward-looking responsibility of patient advocacy organizations: conceptual and ethical analysis.患者倡导组织的集体前瞻性责任:概念和伦理分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Aug 23;22(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00680-w.
3
Experimental (Re)structuring: The Clinical Trial as Turning Point Among Medical Research Participants.实验(再)构建:临床试验作为医学研究参与者的转折点。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Jul;31(8):1504-1517. doi: 10.1177/10497323211016408. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
Partnering with frail or seriously ill patients in research: a systematic review.在研究中与体弱或重病患者合作:一项系统综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 11;6:52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00225-2. eCollection 2020.
5
Patient and Public Engagement in Integrated Knowledge Translation Research: Are we there yet?患者及公众参与整合知识转化研究:我们做到了吗?
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Feb 12;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0139-1. eCollection 2019.
6
Unique role of rheumatology in establishing collaborative relationships in research. Past, present and future of patient engagement.风湿病学在建立研究合作关系方面的独特作用。患者参与的过去、现在和未来。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Mar;78(3):293-296. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214387. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
7
The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement.参与式时代精神:医疗保健改善中共同生产和共同设计时代变革的一种解释性理论模型。
Med Humanit. 2019 Sep;45(3):247-257. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011398. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
8
Major health service transformation and the public voice: conflict, challenge or complicity?主要卫生服务转型与公众声音:冲突、挑战还是共谋?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jan;23(1):28-35. doi: 10.1177/1355819617728530. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
9
"How can anybody be representative for those kind of people?" Forms of patient representation in health research, and why it is always contestable.在健康研究中,如何让任何人能够代表那类人群?患者代表性的形式,以及为什么这始终是有争议的。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jun;183:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.049. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
What is "the patient perspective" in patient engagement programs? Implicit logics and parallels to feminist theories.患者参与项目中的“患者视角”是什么?隐含逻辑及与女性主义理论的相似之处。
Health (London). 2017 Jan;21(1):76-92. doi: 10.1177/1363459316644494. Epub 2016 Jul 24.