Sports Physical Therapy Residency program, UF Health, Gainesville, United States.
Rehabilitation, UF Health, Gainesville, United States.
Int J Sports Med. 2024 Jun;45(6):411-421. doi: 10.1055/a-2161-4867. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether Olympic weightlifting (OW) exercises would improve sprint performance when compared to a control intervention, (no training, standard sport-specific training, traditional resistance training, or plyometric training). Medline, Web of Science, SportDiscus, CINAHL, and Biological Science from inception to September 2022 was searched. Two authors independently selected the included studies, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The primary meta-analysis combined the results of the sprint performance over the full length of each sprint test. The secondary meta-analyses combined the results of the sprint performance at 5, 10, and 20 m distance to capture information about the acceleration phase of the sprint tests. Eight studies with 206 athletes (female n=10, age range: 18.9-24.2 years) were identified. Sprint performance did not differ significantly comparing OW to the control intervention, nor at the full length (standardized mean difference=-0.07, 95% CI=-0.47 to 0.34, =0.75, I=46%) or during the acceleration phase (≥0.26) of the sprint test. OW training does not improve sprint performance to a greater extent than comparator interventions.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定与对照干预(无训练、标准专项运动训练、传统阻力训练或增强式训练)相比,奥林匹克举重(OW)练习是否会提高短跑成绩。从开始到 2022 年 9 月,检索了 Medline、Web of Science、SportDiscus、CINAHL 和 Biological Science。两位作者独立选择纳入的研究,提取数据,并评估偏倚风险。使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation)评估证据的确定性。主要荟萃分析结合了每个短跑测试的全长短跑表现的结果。次要荟萃分析结合了 5、10 和 20m 距离的短跑表现结果,以捕捉短跑测试加速阶段的信息。确定了 8 项研究,涉及 206 名运动员(女性 n=10,年龄范围:18.9-24.2 岁)。比较 OW 与对照组,在短跑测试的全长(标准化均数差=-0.07,95%CI=-0.47 至 0.34,=0.75,I=46%)或加速阶段(≥0.26),OW 训练并没有显著提高短跑成绩。OW 训练并没有比对照组干预更有效地提高短跑成绩。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017-4