Physiology of Cognition Lab, GIGA-Cyclotron Research Center In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.
National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS), Brussels 1000, Belgium.
J Neurosci. 2023 Oct 4;43(40):6807-6815. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0696-23.2023. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
Mind-blanking (MB) is termed as the inability to report our immediate-past mental content. In contrast to mental states with reportable content, such as mind-wandering or sensory perceptions, the neural correlates of MB started getting elucidated only recently. A notable particularity that pertains to MB studies is the way MB is instructed for reporting, like by deliberately asking participants to "empty their minds." Such instructions were shown to induce fMRI activations in frontal brain regions, typically associated with metacognition and self-evaluative processes, suggesting that MB may be a result of intentional mental content suppression. Here, we aim at examining this hypothesis by determining the neural correlates of MB without induction. Using fMRI combined with experience-sampling in 31 participants (22 female), univariate analysis of MB reports revealed deactivations in occipital, frontal, parietal, and thalamic areas, but no activations in prefrontal regions. These findings were confirmed using Bayesian region-of-interest analysis on areas previously shown to be implicated in induced MB, where we report evidence for frontal deactivations during MB reports compared with other mental states. Contrast analysis between reports of MB and content-oriented mental states also revealed deactivations in the left angular gyrus. We propose that these effects characterize a neuronal profile of MB, where key thalamocortical nodes are unable to communicate and formulate reportable content. Collectively, we show that study instructions for MB lead to differential neural activation. These results provide mechanistic insights linked to the phenomenology of MB and point to the possibility of MB being expressed in different forms. This study explores how brain activity changes when individuals report unidentifiable thoughts, a phenomenon known as mind-blanking (MB). It aims to detect changes in brain activations and deactivations when MB is reported spontaneously, as opposed to the neural responses that have been previously reported when MB is induced. By means of brain imaging and experience-sampling, the study points to reduced brain activity in a wide number of regions, including those mesio-frontally which were previously detected as activated during induced MB. These results enhance our understanding of the complexity of spontaneous thinking and contribute to broader discussions on consciousness and reportable experience.
思维空白(MB)是指无法报告我们最近的心理内容。与可报告内容的心理状态(如走神或感官知觉)不同,MB 的神经相关性直到最近才得到阐明。MB 研究的一个显著特点是报告 MB 的方式,例如通过故意要求参与者“放空大脑”。这些指令被证明会在额前脑区引起 fMRI 激活,这些脑区通常与元认知和自我评估过程有关,表明 MB 可能是有意抑制心理内容的结果。在这里,我们旨在通过确定没有诱导的 MB 的神经相关性来检验这一假设。我们使用 fMRI 结合 31 名参与者(22 名女性)的经验抽样,对 MB 报告的单变量分析显示,在枕叶、额叶、顶叶和丘脑区域有去激活现象,但在额前区域没有激活。使用先前显示与诱导 MB 有关的区域的贝叶斯感兴趣区分析对这些发现进行了验证,我们报告了与其他心理状态相比,MB 报告期间额前区去激活的证据。MB 报告与以内容为导向的心理状态之间的对比分析也显示左角回有去激活现象。我们提出,这些效应是 MB 的神经元特征,其中关键的丘脑皮质节点无法进行通讯并形成可报告的内容。总的来说,我们表明,MB 的研究指令会导致神经激活的差异。这些结果提供了与 MB 现象学相关的机制见解,并指出 MB 可能以不同的形式表现出来。本研究探索了当个体报告无法识别的想法时大脑活动的变化,这种现象被称为思维空白(MB)。它旨在检测自发报告 MB 时大脑激活和去激活的变化,而不是之前报道的诱导 MB 时的神经反应。通过脑成像和经验抽样,该研究指出,在广泛的区域中,大脑活动减少,包括那些在前额中部被检测到在诱导 MB 期间激活的区域。这些结果加深了我们对自发思维复杂性的理解,并促进了关于意识和可报告经验的更广泛讨论。