• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫情期间居家工作的生产力以及有偿工作、无偿工作和休闲活动之间的时间分配

Productivity of Working at Home and Time Allocation Between Paid Work, Unpaid Work and Leisure Activities During a Pandemic.

机构信息

Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Jan;40(1):77-90. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01078-7. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-021-01078-7
PMID:34472047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8410454/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken by governments to contain it have affected many aspects of the daily lives of citizens. This study aimed to describe changes in the productivity of paid work and time allocation to paid and unpaid work and leisure resulting from working at home during the pandemic.

METHODS

A sample of 851 people from the Netherlands who had paid work (≥ 24 h/week) and worked at least 4 hours per week extra at home because of lockdown measures completed a questionnaire during the first COVID-19 lockdown (April 2020). Respondents reported time spent on paid and unpaid work and leisure before and during the lockdown. Productivity was measured in terms of quantity and quality of paid work.

RESULTS

On average, respondents spent less time (14%) on paid work and productivity decreased 5.5%. Changes in productivity were associated with the age of children, net income and having a separate home office. Respondents spent more time on unpaid work (27%) and leisure (11%). Women spent more time on unpaid work in absolute but not in relative terms. People with a partner and with children spent more time on unpaid work and less time on leisure.

CONCLUSIONS

Productivity of paid work decreased, and people reallocated time between paid and unpaid work and leisure during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Changes in time allocation and productivity differed across subgroups. If working at home becomes more common, future research should focus on the long-term impact on productivity and mental and physical health.

摘要

背景与目的

COVID-19 大流行及其导致的各国政府防控措施对公民日常生活的许多方面都产生了影响。本研究旨在描述因疫情封锁措施而居家办公对有偿工作的生产力和有偿工作、无偿工作及休闲时间分配的影响。

方法

荷兰的一个样本,由 851 名每周工作至少 24 小时且因封锁措施每周在家额外工作至少 4 小时的有薪工作者组成,在第一次 COVID-19 封锁期间(2020 年 4 月)完成了一份问卷。受访者报告了封锁前和封锁期间用于有偿和无偿工作及休闲的时间。生产力用有偿工作的数量和质量来衡量。

结果

平均而言,受访者的有偿工作时间减少了 14%,生产力下降了 5.5%。生产力的变化与儿童的年龄、净收入和有单独的家庭办公室有关。受访者的无偿工作时间增加了 27%,休闲时间增加了 11%。妇女在绝对时间上花费了更多的无偿工作时间,但相对时间上没有变化。有伴侣和有孩子的人在无偿工作上花费了更多的时间,休闲时间减少了。

结论

在第一次 COVID-19 封锁期间,有偿工作的生产力下降,人们在有偿和无偿工作及休闲之间重新分配时间。时间分配和生产力的变化因亚组而异。如果在家工作变得更加普遍,未来的研究应关注对生产力以及身心健康的长期影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/8739461/d81f98d942b1/40273_2021_1078_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/8739461/800b205c4e26/40273_2021_1078_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/8739461/12530ed895fd/40273_2021_1078_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/8739461/fc453b8fd20d/40273_2021_1078_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/8739461/23052e474ef9/40273_2021_1078_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/8739461/d81f98d942b1/40273_2021_1078_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/8739461/800b205c4e26/40273_2021_1078_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/8739461/12530ed895fd/40273_2021_1078_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/8739461/fc453b8fd20d/40273_2021_1078_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/8739461/23052e474ef9/40273_2021_1078_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/8739461/d81f98d942b1/40273_2021_1078_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Productivity of Working at Home and Time Allocation Between Paid Work, Unpaid Work and Leisure Activities During a Pandemic.疫情期间居家工作的生产力以及有偿工作、无偿工作和休闲活动之间的时间分配
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Jan;40(1):77-90. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01078-7. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
2
Gender differences in unpaid care work and psychological distress in the UK Covid-19 lockdown.英国新冠疫情封锁期间无薪护理工作与心理困扰方面的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247959. eCollection 2021.
3
'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown.“智能”封锁,智能影响?荷兰新冠封锁期间,针对带薪工作中的性别(不平等)、儿童保育和家务分工以及父母生活质量的一项调查结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242249. eCollection 2020.
4
Decision-making for receiving paid home care for dementia in the time of COVID-19: a qualitative study.在 COVID-19 期间决定接受有偿家庭痴呆症护理:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 9;20(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01719-0.
5
Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on office worker productivity and work experience.新冠疫情期间居家办公:对上班族生产力和工作体验的影响。
Work. 2021;69(4):1171-1189. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210301.
6
Time Is Money: Investigating the Value of Leisure Time and Unpaid Work.时间就是金钱:探究闲暇时间和无偿工作的价值。
Value Health. 2018 Dec;21(12):1428-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.1828. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
7
Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Faculty - An Exacerbation of Gender Differences in Unpaid Home Duties and Professional Productivity.COVID-19 对放射科教师的影响 - 加剧了无偿家务和专业生产力方面的性别差异。
Acad Radiol. 2021 Sep;28(9):1185-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 25.
8
Changes in Families' Leisure, Educational/Work and Social Screen Time Behaviours before and during COVID-19 in Australia: Findings from the Our Life at Home Study.澳大利亚在 COVID-19 前后家庭休闲、教育/工作和社会屏幕时间行为的变化:来自我们家庭生活研究的发现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 28;18(21):11335. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111335.
9
Leisure Time Use and Adolescent Mental Well-Being: Insights from the COVID-19 Czech Spring Lockdown.闲暇时间利用与青少年心理健康:COVID-19 捷克春假封锁的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 5;18(23):12812. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312812.
10
Leisure time physical activity and exercise performance in active older people in rural areas-Comparison of the first and second COVID-19 related lockdown in Germany.农村地区活跃老年人的闲暇时间体力活动和运动表现——比较德国第一次和第二次与 COVID-19 相关的封锁。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 14;18(9):e0291560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291560. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom on adolescent's time use (CONTRAST study).英国新冠疫情封锁对青少年时间利用的影响(对比研究)
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 16;20(1):e0310597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310597. eCollection 2025.
2
Which Occupations Did People Engage in during Lockdown? A European Cross-Sectional Descriptive Survey by Generation.疫情封锁期间人们从事哪些职业?一项按世代划分的欧洲跨部门描述性调查。
Occup Ther Int. 2023 Aug 21;2023:3979298. doi: 10.1155/2023/3979298. eCollection 2023.
3
Activities Carried Out during the First COVID-19 Lockdown by Italian Citizens.

本文引用的文献

1
The broader societal impacts of COVID-19 and the growing importance of capturing these in health economic analyses.COVID-19 的更广泛的社会影响,以及在健康经济分析中捕捉这些影响的重要性日益增加。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Mar 9;37:e43. doi: 10.1017/S0266462321000155.
2
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown.
意大利公民在第一次 COVID-19 封锁期间开展的活动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;20(5):3906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053906.
4
Production Losses due to Absenteeism and Presenteeism: The Influence of Compensation Mechanisms and Multiplier Effects.因旷工和出勤主义导致的生产损失:薪酬机制和乘数效应的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Sep;41(9):1103-1115. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01253-y. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Low impact of regular PCR testing on presence at work site during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences during an open observational study in Lower Saxony 2020-21.在 2020-21 年下萨克森州进行的一项开放观察性研究中,定期进行 PCR 检测对新冠疫情期间工作场所的出勤率影响不大。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;23(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15036-9.
“智能”封锁,智能影响?荷兰新冠封锁期间,针对带薪工作中的性别(不平等)、儿童保育和家务分工以及父母生活质量的一项调查结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242249. eCollection 2020.
4
Impacts of Working From Home During COVID-19 Pandemic on Physical and Mental Well-Being of Office Workstation Users.新冠疫情期间居家办公对办公工位使用者身心健康的影响。
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Mar 1;63(3):181-190. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002097.
5
The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility.新冠疫情对职业地位、居家办公和职业流动性的潜在影响。
J Vocat Behav. 2020 Jun;119:103442. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442. Epub 2020 May 8.
6
Time Is Money: Investigating the Value of Leisure Time and Unpaid Work.时间就是金钱:探究闲暇时间和无偿工作的价值。
Value Health. 2018 Dec;21(12):1428-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.1828. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
7
Unpaid work in health economic evaluations.卫生经济评估中的无偿工作。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;144:127-37. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
8
The iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire: A Standardized Instrument for Measuring and Valuing Health-Related Productivity Losses.iMTA生产力成本问卷:一种用于测量和评估与健康相关的生产力损失的标准化工具。
Value Health. 2015 Sep;18(6):753-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
9
How to include informal care in economic evaluations.如何将非正规护理纳入经济评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Dec;31(12):1105-19. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0104-z.
10
Sustained informal care: the feasibility, construct validity and test-retest reliability of the CarerQol-instrument to measure the impact of informal care in long-term care.持续的非正规护理:CareQol 工具测量长期护理中非正规护理影响的可行性、结构有效性和重测信度。
Aging Ment Health. 2011 Nov;15(8):1018-27. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.575351. Epub 2011 Jun 27.