• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任与健康信息交流:个人健康信息共享意向的定性分析。

Trust and Health Information Exchanges: Qualitative Analysis of the Intent to Share Personal Health Information.

机构信息

Fraunhofer Center for International Management and Knowledge Economy IMW, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 30;25:e41635. doi: 10.2196/41635.

DOI:10.2196/41635
PMID:37647102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10500360/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health has the potential to improve the quality of care, reduce health care costs, and increase patient satisfaction. Patient acceptance and consent are a prerequisite for effective sharing of personal health information (PHI) through health information exchanges (HIEs). Patients need to form and retain trust in the system(s) they use to leverage the full potential of digital health. Germany is at the forefront of approving digital treatment options with cost coverage through statutory health insurance. However, the German population has a high level of technology skepticism and a low level of trust, providing a good basis to illuminate various facets of eHealth trust formation.

OBJECTIVE

In a German setting, we aimed to answer the question, How does an individual form a behavioral intent to share PHI with an HIE platform? We discussed trust and informed consent through (1) synthesizing the main influence factor models into a complex model of trust in HIE, (2) providing initial validation of influence factors based on a qualitative study with patient interviews, and (3) developing a model of trust formation for digital health apps.

METHODS

We developed a complex model of the formation of trust and the intent to share PHI. We provided initial validation of the influence factors through 20 qualitative, semistructured interviews in the German health care setting and used a deductive coding approach to analyze the data.

RESULTS

We found that German patients show a positive intent to share their PHI with HIEs under certain conditions. These include (perceived) information security and a noncommercial organization as the recipient of the PHI. Technology experience, age, policy and regulation, and a disposition to trust play an important role in an individual's privacy concern, which, combined with social influence, affects trust formation on a cognitive and emotional level. We found a high level of cognitive trust in health care and noncommercial research institutions but distrust in commercial entities. We further found that in-person interactions with physicians increase trust in digital health apps and PHI sharing. Patients' emotional trust depends on disposition and social influences. To form their intent to share, patients undergo a privacy calculus. Hereby, the individual's benefit (eg, convenience), benefits for the individual's own health, and the benefits for public welfare often outweigh the perceived risks of sharing PHI.

CONCLUSIONS

With the higher demand for timely PHI, HIE providers will need to clearly communicate the benefits of their solutions and their information security measures to health care providers (physicians, nursing and administrative staff) and patients and include them as key partners to increase trust. Offering easy access and educational measures as well as the option for specific consent may increase patients' trust and their intention to share PHI.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1713/10500360/011672b71e2f/jmir_v25i1e41635_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1713/10500360/771f84853fea/jmir_v25i1e41635_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1713/10500360/011672b71e2f/jmir_v25i1e41635_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1713/10500360/771f84853fea/jmir_v25i1e41635_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1713/10500360/011672b71e2f/jmir_v25i1e41635_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

数字健康有望提高医疗质量、降低医疗成本和提高患者满意度。患者接受和同意是通过健康信息交换(HIE)有效共享个人健康信息(PHI)的前提。患者需要在使用系统时形成并保持信任,以充分发挥数字健康的潜力。德国在通过法定健康保险批准数字治疗方案并提供费用覆盖方面处于领先地位。然而,德国民众对技术持高度怀疑态度,信任度低,这为阐明电子健康信任形成的各个方面提供了很好的基础。

目的

在德国环境下,我们旨在回答以下问题:个人如何形成与 HIE 平台共享 PHI 的行为意图?我们通过(1)将主要影响因素模型综合为 HIE 信任的复杂模型,(2)基于对患者访谈的定性研究初步验证影响因素,以及(3)为数字健康应用程序建立信任形成模型来讨论信任和知情同意。

方法

我们开发了信任和共享 PHI 意图形成的复杂模型。我们通过在德国医疗保健环境下进行的 20 次定性、半结构化访谈初步验证了影响因素,并使用演绎编码方法对数据进行分析。

结果

我们发现,在某些条件下,德国患者表示愿意将其 PHI 与 HIE 共享。这些条件包括(感知到的)信息安全和非商业组织作为 PHI 的接收者。技术经验、年龄、政策法规以及信任倾向在个人的隐私关注中起着重要作用,这与社会影响一起,在认知和情感层面影响信任的形成。我们发现,人们对医疗保健和非商业研究机构的信任度很高,但对商业实体的信任度较低。我们进一步发现,与医生的面对面互动会增加对数字健康应用程序和 PHI 共享的信任。患者的情感信任取决于倾向和社会影响。为了形成共享意图,患者会进行隐私计算。在此过程中,个人的利益(例如方便)、对个人健康的利益以及公共福利的利益往往超过共享 PHI 的感知风险。

结论

随着对及时 PHI 的需求增加,HIE 提供商将需要向医疗保健提供者(医生、护理和行政人员)和患者清楚地传达其解决方案的好处及其信息安全措施,并将其作为增加信任的关键合作伙伴。提供便捷访问和教育措施以及特定同意的选择可能会增加患者的信任度和他们共享 PHI 的意愿。

相似文献

1
Trust and Health Information Exchanges: Qualitative Analysis of the Intent to Share Personal Health Information.信任与健康信息交流:个人健康信息共享意向的定性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 30;25:e41635. doi: 10.2196/41635.
2
Patients' Perceptions of Different Information Exchange Mechanisms: An Exploratory Study in the United States.患者对不同信息交流机制的看法:美国的一项探索性研究。
Methods Inf Med. 2020 Aug;59(4-05):162-178. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721784. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
3
Patient Privacy Perspectives on Health Information Exchange in a Mental Health Context: Qualitative Study.心理健康背景下健康信息交换中的患者隐私视角:定性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Nov 13;6(11):e13306. doi: 10.2196/13306.
4
Greater patient health information control to improve the sustainability of health information exchanges.提高患者健康信息控制水平,增强健康信息交换的可持续性。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jul;83:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
5
Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review.患者在数字健康背景下对知情同意的观点和偏好:最新文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 10;25:e42507. doi: 10.2196/42507.
6
Putting the Focus Back on the Patient: How Privacy Concerns Affect Personal Health Information Sharing Intentions.将焦点重新放回患者身上:隐私担忧如何影响个人健康信息共享意愿。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 13;19(9):e169. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6877.
7
Differing Strategies to Meet Information-Sharing Needs: Publicly Supported Community Health Information Exchanges Versus Health Systems' Enterprise Health Information Exchanges.满足信息共享需求的不同策略:公共支持的社区健康信息交换与卫生系统的企业健康信息交换
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):77-108. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12180.
8
The Potential of Blockchain Technology for Health Information Exchange: Experimental Study From Patients' Perspectives.区块链技术在健康信息交换中的潜力:基于患者视角的实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 20;21(6):e14184. doi: 10.2196/14184.
9
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.
10
The Impacts of the Perceived Transparency of Privacy Policies and Trust in Providers for Building Trust in Health Information Exchange: Empirical Study.隐私政策感知透明度及对提供者的信任对建立健康信息交换信任的影响:实证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Nov 26;7(4):e14050. doi: 10.2196/14050.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting trust and intention to adopt health information generated by ChatGPT among healthcare customers: An empirical study.促进医疗保健客户对ChatGPT生成的健康信息的信任和采用意愿:一项实证研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 28;11:20552076251374121. doi: 10.1177/20552076251374121. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
What are patient perspectives on privacy and trust in digital genomic tools? A qualitative study.患者对数字基因组工具中的隐私和信任有何看法?一项定性研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70025. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70025.
3
Heterogeneity in willingness to share personal health information: a nationwide cluster analysis of 20,000 adults in Japan.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Acceptance of Prescribed and Fully Reimbursed mHealth Apps in Germany: An UTAUT2-based Online Survey Study.德国患者对处方和全额报销的移动健康应用程序的接受度:基于 UTAUT2 的在线调查研究。
J Med Syst. 2023 Jan 27;47(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01910-x.
2
Acceptance of digital health applications in non-pharmacological therapies in German statutory healthcare system: Results of an online survey.德国法定医疗保健系统中数字健康应用在非药物治疗中的接受度:一项在线调查的结果。
Digit Health. 2022 Dec 6;8:20552076221131142. doi: 10.1177/20552076221131142. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
Patients' and Publics' Preferences for Data-Intensive Health Research Governance: Survey Study.
分享个人健康信息意愿的异质性:对日本20000名成年人的全国性聚类分析。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Apr 18;83(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01599-z.
4
The perception of facilitators and barriers to the use of e-health solutions in Poland: a qualitative study.波兰对电子健康解决方案使用的促进因素和障碍的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02791-x.
5
Consent forms used by patient assistance programs raise privacy concerns.患者援助项目所使用的同意书引发了隐私方面的担忧。
Can Fam Physician. 2024 Nov-Dec;70(11-12):685-687. doi: 10.46747/cfp.701112685.
6
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can Fam Physician. 2024 Nov-Dec;70(11-12):694-696. doi: 10.46747/cfp.701112694.
7
Adoption and perception of prescribable digital health applications (DiGA) and the advancing digitalization among German internal medicine physicians: a cross-sectional survey study.德国内科医生对可处方数字健康应用程序(DiGA)的采用和认知,以及不断推进的数字化:一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):1353. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11807-1.
患者和公众对数据密集型健康研究治理的偏好:调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 7;9(3):e36797. doi: 10.2196/36797.
4
Privacy and Trust in eHealth: A Fuzzy Linguistic Solution for Calculating the Merit of Service.电子健康中的隐私与信任:一种用于计算服务价值的模糊语言解决方案。
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 19;12(5):657. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050657.
5
Attitudes Toward Mobile Apps for Pandemic Research Among Smartphone Users in Germany: National Survey.德国智能手机用户对大流行研究移动应用程序的态度:全国性调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 24;10(1):e31857. doi: 10.2196/31857.
6
Applying an Extended UTAUT2 Model to Explain User Acceptance of Lifestyle and Therapy Mobile Health Apps: Survey Study.应用扩展的 UTAUT2 模型解释生活方式和治疗移动健康应用的用户接受度:调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 18;10(1):e27095. doi: 10.2196/27095.
7
Physicians' Attitudes Toward Prescribable mHealth Apps and Implications for Adoption in Germany: Mixed Methods Study.医生对可开方的移动医疗应用程序的态度及其在德国采用的影响:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 23;9(11):e33012. doi: 10.2196/33012.
8
Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey.德国的数字化与健康:全国性横断面调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 22;7(11):e32951. doi: 10.2196/32951.
9
Blockchain for Increased Trust in Virtual Health Care: Proof-of-Concept Study.区块链增强虚拟医疗信任:概念验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 30;23(7):e28496. doi: 10.2196/28496.
10
Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.德语国家对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的早期看法:比较混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25525. doi: 10.2196/25525.