University of Brighton, UK.
University of Chichester, UK.
Health (London). 2024 Sep;28(5):754-774. doi: 10.1177/13634593231195784. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
The use of resilience in social practice has evolved from a theoretical framework at the intersection between individuals and their social ecology. Critics argue this theory still results in policies and practices that are too individualised, with the potential for negative social consequences. This paper further critiques contemporary understanding of resilience theory and its application. It juxtaposes complex systems theory with a social inequalities oriented resilience practice. This provides a paradoxical approach. It is acknowledged that state and public policy decisions and actions can be anti-resilient, undermining community and social resilience that already exists in the form of social relationships, self-organisation and co-production. Nevertheless, collective social resilience also illustrates the potential of local and service user organisations to contribute to an overall transformational change process.
弹性在社会实践中的应用已经从个人及其社会生态之间的理论框架演变而来。批评者认为,该理论仍然导致政策和实践过于个体化,可能带来负面的社会后果。本文进一步批评了对弹性理论及其应用的当代理解。它将复杂系统理论与面向社会不平等的弹性实践并列。这提供了一种自相矛盾的方法。人们认识到,国家和公共政策的决策和行动可能是反弹性的,破坏了以社会关系、自我组织和共同生产形式存在的社区和社会弹性。然而,集体社会弹性也说明了地方和服务用户组织为推动整体转型变革过程做出贡献的潜力。