Raijmann Renee C M A, Koek Huiberdina L, Emmelot-Vonk Marielle H, Swaving Joost G E, Agema Willem R P, Kerckhoffs Angèle P M, Keijsers Carolina J P W
Department of Geriatrics, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Department of Geriatrics, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Neth Heart J. 2024 Feb;32(2):76-83. doi: 10.1007/s12471-023-01806-y. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
Cardiovascular disease and frailty are common among the population aged 85+. We hypothesised these patients might benefit from geriatric co-management, as has been shown in other frail patient populations. However, there is limited evidence supporting geriatric co-management in older, hospitalised cardiology patients.
A retrospective cohort study was performed in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands. We compared patients aged 85 and over admitted to the cardiology ward before (control group) and after the implementation of standard geriatric co-management (intervention group). Data on readmission, mortality, length of stay, number of consultations, delirium, and falls were analysed.
The data of 1163 patients were analysed (n = 542 control, n = 621 intervention). In the intervention group, 251 patients did not receive the intervention because of logistic reasons or the treating physician's decision. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the intervention and control groups. Patients in the intervention group had a shorter length of stay (-1 day, p = 0.01) and were more often discharged to a geriatric rehabilitation facility (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-3.54, p = 0.02) compared with the control patients. Other outcomes were not significantly different between the groups.
After implementation of standard geriatric co-management for hospitalised cardiology patients aged 85 and over, the length of hospital stay shortened and the number of patients discharged to a geriatric rehabilitation facility increased. The adherence to geriatric team recommendations was high. Geriatric co-management would appear to optimise care for older hospitalised patients with cardiac disease.
心血管疾病和身体虚弱在85岁以上人群中很常见。我们假设这些患者可能会从老年病共同管理中受益,正如在其他身体虚弱的患者群体中所显示的那样。然而,支持对老年住院心脏病患者进行老年病共同管理的证据有限。
在荷兰的一家大型教学医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们比较了85岁及以上入住心脏病病房的患者在实施标准老年病共同管理之前(对照组)和之后(干预组)的情况。分析了再入院、死亡率、住院时间、会诊次数、谵妄和跌倒的数据。
分析了1163例患者的数据(n = 542例对照组,n = 621例干预组)。在干预组中,251例患者由于后勤原因或主治医生的决定未接受干预。干预组和对照组的基线特征具有可比性。与对照组患者相比,干预组患者的住院时间较短(-1天,p = 0.01),更常被转至老年康复机构(优势比[OR] 1.97,95%置信区间[CI] 1.10 - 3.54,p = 0.02)。两组之间的其他结果没有显著差异。
对85岁及以上住院心脏病患者实施标准老年病共同管理后,住院时间缩短,转至老年康复机构的患者数量增加。对老年团队建议的依从性很高。老年病共同管理似乎可以优化老年住院心脏病患者的护理。