Raijmann Renee C M A, Koek Huiberdina L, Emmelot-Vonk Marielle H, Agema Willem R P, Kerckhoffs Angele P M, Keijsers Carolina J P W
Department of Geriatrics, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Geroscience. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01859-4.
As patients with cardiovascular disease age, the need for cardiogeriatric care grows. Therefore, we aimed to identify facilitators and hindrances to the implementation of cardiogeriatric care by analysing geriatric recommendations content and acceptance rates. This retrospective cohort study included 100 patients aged > 85 years who received geriatric consultation and were admitted to a cardiology department. A random sample was generated, of which half received proactive geriatric consultation and half received usual care (geriatric consultation upon request). The recommendation content was categorized into geriatric domains (physical, mental, functional, social, and existential), and recommendation uptake was categorized into seven categories (e.g., accepted, declined by patient). Additionally, factors associated with acceptance rates were analysed using univariate logistic regression. The study population (mean age 88, 60% female) received 310 recommendations of which 56% were accepted. The acceptance rate was significantly higher if recommendations belonged to the functional (OR 3.10 (95% CI 1.41-6.82)), social (OR 5.55 (95% CI 2.40-13.00)), and existential domain (OR 6.09 (95% CI 2.62-14.16)) compared to the physical domain. Furthermore, higher acceptance rates were observed if recommendations were communicated verbally instead of electronically (OR 2.16 (95% CI 1.30-6.70)), when a clear tone was used instead of a doubtful one (OR 1.90 (95% CI 1.01-3.56)), and if the recommendation was concisely documented (OR 1.11 (95% CI 1.04-1.20) per average 10 words decrease). In this study, the acceptance rate of geriatric recommendations for older patients with cardiac disease was low. Recommendations regarding the functional, social, and existential domains had the highest acceptance rates. To improve acceptance rates, recommendations should be communicated verbally, documented concisely, and a doubtful tone should be avoided.
随着心血管疾病患者年龄的增长,对老年心脏病护理的需求也在增加。因此,我们旨在通过分析老年护理建议的内容和接受率,确定实施老年心脏病护理的促进因素和阻碍因素。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了100名年龄大于85岁、接受过老年护理咨询并入住心脏病科的患者。生成了一个随机样本,其中一半接受主动老年护理咨询,另一半接受常规护理(按需进行老年护理咨询)。建议内容被归类为老年护理领域(身体、心理、功能、社会和生存),建议采纳情况被分为七类(例如,被接受、被患者拒绝)。此外,使用单因素逻辑回归分析与接受率相关的因素。研究人群(平均年龄88岁,60%为女性)共收到310条建议,其中56%被接受。与身体领域相比,如果建议属于功能领域(比值比3.10(95%置信区间1.41 - 6.82))、社会领域(比值比5.55(95%置信区间2.40 - 13.00))和生存领域(比值比6.09(95%置信区间2.62 - 14.16)),接受率显著更高。此外,如果建议通过口头传达而非电子方式传达(比值比2.16(95%置信区间1.30 - 6.70)),使用明确语气而非怀疑语气(比值比1.90(95%置信区间1.01 - 3.56)),并且建议记录简洁(每减少10个平均字数,比值比1.11(95%置信区间1.04 - 1.20)),则观察到更高的接受率。在本研究中,老年心脏病患者对老年护理建议的接受率较低。关于功能、社会和生存领域的建议接受率最高。为提高接受率,建议应通过口头传达、简洁记录,并避免使用怀疑语气。