Soliman Paul, Amaefuna Ifenna, Gully Brian J, Haass-Koffler Carolina L
Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Alcohol. 2024 Mar;115:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2023.08.012. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
The goal of this study was to assess the readability of online resources pertaining to Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) as perceived by patients seeking treatment. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and American Medical Association (AMA) have recommended that medical resources should be written at a 6th-grade reading level. However, prior investigations in various medical fields have revealed that online materials often fail to adhere to these guidelines. An internet search was conducted to simulate the experience of patients seeking information on AUD treatment. The first 30 websites that did not require login credentials were examined using established readability tests. The main outcomes included: Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, Gunning Fog index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Readability Formula, and Coleman-Liau index. Thirty records were identified where the mean readability level was 12.37 (2.54). There were no significant differences in mean readability across readability indices or author type. None of the 30 records met the reading level recommendations as set by the NIH and AMA. In order to enhance accessibility and ultimately improve AUD health outcomes, it is recommended that patient-oriented resources be crafted with adherence to these guidelines. Consequently, future AUD resources ought to prioritize the enhancement of their readability.
本研究的目的是评估寻求治疗的患者所认为的与酒精使用障碍(AUD)相关的在线资源的可读性。美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和美国医学协会(AMA)建议医学资源应以六年级阅读水平编写。然而,此前在各个医学领域的调查显示,在线材料往往不符合这些指导方针。进行了一次互联网搜索,以模拟寻求AUD治疗信息的患者的体验。使用既定的可读性测试检查了前30个不需要登录凭证的网站。主要结果包括:弗莱施-金凯德阅读年级水平、冈宁雾度指数、简化的晦涩难懂性测量法(SMOG)可读性公式和科尔曼-廖指数。确定了30条记录,平均可读性水平为12.37(2.54)。不同可读性指数或作者类型的平均可读性没有显著差异。30条记录中没有一条符合NIH和AMA设定的阅读水平建议。为了提高可及性并最终改善AUD的健康结果,建议遵循这些指导方针编写以患者为导向的资源。因此,未来的AUD资源应优先提高其可读性。