• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating the readability of online patient-facing resources for alcohol use disorder.评估面向患者的酒精使用障碍在线资源的可读性。
Alcohol. 2024 Mar;115:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2023.08.012. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
3
Health Literacy in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Quantitative Assessment of the Understandability and Readability of Online Patient Education Material.肩关镜手术中的健康素养:对在线患者教育材料的可理解性和可读性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):151-158.
4
Craniosynostosis: Are Online Resources Readable?颅缝早闭:网络资源可读性如何?
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Jul;61(7):1228-1232. doi: 10.1177/10556656231154843. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
5
Readability and Accessibility of Patient-Education Materials for Heart Failure in the United States.美国心力衰竭患者教育材料的可读性和可及性
J Card Fail. 2025 Jan;31(1):154-157. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.06.015. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
Readability of Spanish-Language Online Patient Educational Materials for Peripheral Artery Disease Do Not Meet Recommended Standards and Represent a Literacy Barrier to Care.西班牙语在线外周动脉疾病患者教育材料的可读性不符合推荐标准,代表了患者获取医疗服务的读写能力障碍。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Apr;101:157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.029. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
7
Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources.全膝关节置换术:在线患者教育资源的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2022;42(2):98-106.
8
Academic and community hernia center websites in the United States fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability.美国的学术和社区疝中心网站未能达到可及性的卫生保健读写能力标准。
Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):779-786. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02584-z. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
9
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
10
The readability of psychosocial wellness patient resources: improving surgical outcomes.心理社会健康患者资源的可读性:改善手术效果。
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.033. Epub 2017 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Intranasal insulin for the treatment of alcohol use disorder: design and methodology of an alcohol interaction randomized controlled trial.经鼻胰岛素治疗酒精使用障碍:酒精相互作用随机对照试验的设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Jun 10;46:101509. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101509. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Probenecid as a pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder: A randomized placebo-controlled alcohol interaction trial.丙磺舒作为酒精使用障碍的药物治疗:一项随机安慰剂对照酒精相互作用试验。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Dec;48(12):2391-2403. doi: 10.1111/acer.15470. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Naloxone Online Information Exceeds the Recommended Reading Level for Patient Education Materials.纳洛酮在线信息超出了患者教育材料的推荐阅读水平。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023 Sep;84(5):680-683. doi: 10.15288/jsad.22-00343. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
2
Craniosynostosis: Are Online Resources Readable?颅缝早闭:网络资源可读性如何?
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Jul;61(7):1228-1232. doi: 10.1177/10556656231154843. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
3
Differences in Sociodemographic and Alcohol-Related Clinical Characteristics Between Treatment Seekers and Nontreatment Seekers and Their Role in Predicting Outcomes in the COMBINE Study for Alcohol Use Disorder.酒精使用障碍联合研究中寻求治疗者与未寻求治疗者在社会人口统计学及酒精相关临床特征上的差异及其在预测结果中的作用
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Oct;44(10):2097-2108. doi: 10.1111/acer.14428. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
Treatment Interventions for Women With Alcohol Use Disorder.治疗女性酒精使用障碍的干预措施。
Alcohol Res. 2020 Jul 30;40(2):08. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v40.2.08. eCollection 2020.
5
Readability of Patient Education Materials From RadiologyInfo.org: Has There Been Progress Over the Past 5 Years?从 RadiologyInfo.org 看患者教育材料的易读性:过去 5 年是否有所进步?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Oct;213(4):875-879. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.21047. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
6
Bacchus by Caravaggio as the Visual Diagnosis of Alcohol Use Disorder from the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).卡拉瓦乔所绘的酒神巴克斯与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)第五版中酒精使用障碍的视觉诊断。
Front Psychiatry. 2013 Aug 8;4:86. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00086. eCollection 2013.
7
Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample.利用互联网开展与健康相关的活动:来自全国概率样本的调查结果
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Feb 20;11(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1035.
8
The WWW of the World Wide Web: Who, What, and Why?万维网的万维网:何人、何事与为何?
J Med Internet Res. 2002 Jan-Mar;4(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.1.e4.
9
What attracts patients with diabetes to an internet support group? A 21-month longitudinal website study.是什么吸引糖尿病患者加入网络支持小组?一项为期21个月的网站纵向研究。
Diabet Med. 2001 Feb;18(2):154-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00443.x.

评估面向患者的酒精使用障碍在线资源的可读性。

Evaluating the readability of online patient-facing resources for alcohol use disorder.

作者信息

Soliman Paul, Amaefuna Ifenna, Gully Brian J, Haass-Koffler Carolina L

机构信息

Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.

Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.

出版信息

Alcohol. 2024 Mar;115:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2023.08.012. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.alcohol.2023.08.012
PMID:37661000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10904663/
Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess the readability of online resources pertaining to Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) as perceived by patients seeking treatment. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and American Medical Association (AMA) have recommended that medical resources should be written at a 6th-grade reading level. However, prior investigations in various medical fields have revealed that online materials often fail to adhere to these guidelines. An internet search was conducted to simulate the experience of patients seeking information on AUD treatment. The first 30 websites that did not require login credentials were examined using established readability tests. The main outcomes included: Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, Gunning Fog index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Readability Formula, and Coleman-Liau index. Thirty records were identified where the mean readability level was 12.37 (2.54). There were no significant differences in mean readability across readability indices or author type. None of the 30 records met the reading level recommendations as set by the NIH and AMA. In order to enhance accessibility and ultimately improve AUD health outcomes, it is recommended that patient-oriented resources be crafted with adherence to these guidelines. Consequently, future AUD resources ought to prioritize the enhancement of their readability.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估寻求治疗的患者所认为的与酒精使用障碍(AUD)相关的在线资源的可读性。美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和美国医学协会(AMA)建议医学资源应以六年级阅读水平编写。然而,此前在各个医学领域的调查显示,在线材料往往不符合这些指导方针。进行了一次互联网搜索,以模拟寻求AUD治疗信息的患者的体验。使用既定的可读性测试检查了前30个不需要登录凭证的网站。主要结果包括:弗莱施-金凯德阅读年级水平、冈宁雾度指数、简化的晦涩难懂性测量法(SMOG)可读性公式和科尔曼-廖指数。确定了30条记录,平均可读性水平为12.37(2.54)。不同可读性指数或作者类型的平均可读性没有显著差异。30条记录中没有一条符合NIH和AMA设定的阅读水平建议。为了提高可及性并最终改善AUD的健康结果,建议遵循这些指导方针编写以患者为导向的资源。因此,未来的AUD资源应优先提高其可读性。