Laboratório de Ensino e Pesquisa em Otorrinolaringologia, Universidade de Brasília - Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Instituto de Gestão Estratégica em Saúde, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal - Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Codas. 2023 Sep 1;35(5):e20220041. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022041. eCollection 2023.
To analyze the effect of communication training developed for adolescents on the youth's communication skills.
Forty-one young people participated in the study and were divided into two groups. Group I received intervention - communication training for five weeks; Group II - were guided on the importance of voice for communication. Participants had their communication skills assessed before/after interventions through a self-administered questionnaire, answered by the participant and parents. Both groups had oral presentations recorded on video, which were analyzed by speech therapists through the evaluation of the communication profile, listing the aspects that should be observed as a point of strength/opportunity for improvement. Association between qualitative variables was assessed using Fischer's exact test, Pearson's chi-square test, McNemar's test, and McNemar-Bowker's test. To compare groups, paired t-test and t-test for independent samples, p level <0.05, were used.
The analysis of questionnaires showed improvement in GI in two of the four skills assessed and no difference for GII. The video evaluations showed a significant difference between the groups in terms of eye contact and speech velocity.
This study points out that the communication training method applied to young people might improve communicative skills, providing some insights into their communication strengths and potential areas for development.
分析为青少年开发的沟通培训对年轻人沟通技巧的影响。
41 名年轻人参与了这项研究，他们被分为两组。第 I 组接受了为期五周的沟通培训干预；第 II 组则接受了关于声音在沟通中重要性的指导。参与者在干预前后通过自我管理的问卷评估了他们的沟通技巧，该问卷由参与者和家长回答。两组都录制了口头陈述的视频，言语治疗师通过评估沟通情况来分析视频，列出需要观察的方面，作为优势/改进机会的点。使用 Fisher 精确检验、Pearson 卡方检验、McNemar 检验和 McNemar-Bowker 检验评估定性变量之间的关联。为了比较组间差异，使用配对 t 检验和独立样本 t 检验，p 值<0.05。
问卷分析显示，GI 在评估的四项技能中的两项有改善，而 GII 则没有差异。视频评估显示，两组在眼神交流和语速方面存在显著差异。
本研究指出，应用于年轻人的沟通培训方法可能会提高他们的沟通技巧，为他们的沟通优势和潜在发展领域提供一些见解。
