• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Memory accuracy, suggestibility and credibility in investigative interviews with native and non-native eyewitnesses.

作者信息

Raver Arman, Lindholm Torun, Gustafsson Philip U, Alm Charlotte

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 24;14:1240822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240822. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240822
PMID:37691785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10484215/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Memory accuracy, suggestibility and credibility in investigative interviews with native and non-native eyewitnesses.对母语和非母语目击者进行调查询问时的记忆准确性、易受暗示性和可信度。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 24;14:1240822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240822. eCollection 2023.
2
No evidence that low levels of intoxication at both encoding and retrieval impact scores on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale.没有证据表明在编码和检索时都处于轻度醉酒状态会影响古德琼森易受暗示性量表的分数。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Jun;238(6):1633-1644. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05797-9. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
3
Hypnotic interviewing: the best way to interview eyewitnesses?催眠式询问：询问目击者的最佳方式？
Behav Sci Law. 1998 Winter;16(1):115-29. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199824)16:1<115::aid-bsl296>3.0.co;2-i.
4
Collaborative remembering reduces suggestibility: A study with the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale.协作性记忆可降低暗示性：一项使用 Gudjonsson 暗示性量表的研究。
Memory. 2019 May;27(5):603-611. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1542004. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
5
Police Decision-Making in the Absence of Evidence-Based Guidelines: Assessment of Alcohol-Intoxicated Eyewitnesses.缺乏循证指南情况下的警方决策：对酒精中毒目击者的评估
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 3;13:761956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.761956. eCollection 2022.
6
Postidentification feedback affects real eyewitnesses.身份识别后的反馈会影响真实的目击者。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Feb;18(2):172-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01868.x.
7
Response expectancies, treatment credibility, and hypnotic suggestibility: mediator and moderator effects in hypnotic and cognitive-behavioral pain interventions.反应预期、治疗可信度与催眠易感性：催眠和认知行为疼痛干预中的中介和调节效应
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Apr;33(2):167-78. doi: 10.1007/BF02879898.
8
Eyewitnesses' free-report verbal confidence statements are diagnostic of accuracy.目击者自由报告的口头自信陈述是准确性的诊断依据。
Law Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;45(2):138-151. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000444.
9
Anatomically-neutral dolls: their effects on the memory and suggestibility of 4- to 6-year-old eyewitnesses.解剖学中性玩偶：它们对4至6岁目击者记忆和易受暗示性的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 1996 Dec;20(12):1261-72. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(96)00122-6.
10
Adversarial allegiance: The devil is in the evidence details, not just on the witness stand.对抗性忠诚：问题出在证据细节上，而不只是在证人席上。
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Oct;40(5):524-35. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000198. Epub 2016 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Vocal cues to eyewitness accuracy are detected by listeners with and without language comprehension.有语言理解能力和没有语言理解能力的听众都能检测到目击者准确性的语音线索。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Apr 17;3(1):65. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00237-2.
2
Non-verbal cues in eyewitness testimonies do not predict accuracy or credibility assessments.目击者证词中的非语言线索并不能预测准确性或可信度评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):5265. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89825-0.
3
A critical analysis of gender-based violence reporting and evidence building applications (GBVxTech) for capturing memory reports.对用于收集记忆报告的基于性别的暴力报告和证据构建应用程序（GBVxTech）的批判性分析。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 18;14:1289817. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1289817. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Eyewitness accuracy and retrieval effort: Effects of time and repetition.目击证人准确性与检索努力：时间和重复的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 7;17(9):e0273455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273455. eCollection 2022.
2
Test a Witness's Memory of a Suspect Only Once.仅测试证人对嫌疑人的记忆一次。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2021 Dec;22(1_suppl):1S-18S. doi: 10.1177/15291006211026259.
3
Predicting Accuracy in Eyewitness Testimonies With Memory Retrieval Effort and Confidence.通过记忆检索努力和信心预测目击证人证词的准确性。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 29;10:703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00703. eCollection 2019.
4
Retrieval effort cues predict eyewitness accuracy.检索努力线索可预测目击证人的准确性。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2018 Dec;24(4):534-542. doi: 10.1037/xap0000175. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
5
Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory.重新思考目击者记忆的可靠性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 May;13(3):324-335. doi: 10.1177/1745691617734878.
6
Why eyewitnesses fail.目击者为何会出错。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7758-7764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706891114.
7
Distilling the Confidence-Accuracy Message: A Comment on Wixted and Wells (2017).提炼置信度-准确性信息：对维克斯特德和韦尔斯（2017年）的评论
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 May;18(1):6-9. doi: 10.1177/1529100617699240.
8
The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.目击证人信心与识别准确性之间的关系：新综合。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 May;18(1):10-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100616686966. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
9
The influence of ego depletion on sprint start performance in athletes without track and field experience.自我损耗对无田径经验运动员短跑起跑表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 17;6:1207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01207. eCollection 2015.
10
Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.目击证据：提高其证据价值。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Nov;7(2):45-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x. Epub 2006 Nov 1.