• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围棋棋手的认知反思与心理理论

Cognitive Reflection and Theory of Mind of Go Players.

作者信息

Rieger Marc Olivier, Wang Mei

机构信息

University of Trier1.

WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management2.

出版信息

Adv Cogn Psychol. 2021 May 21;17(2):117-128. doi: 10.5709/acp-0322-6. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.5709/acp-0322-6
PMID:37701764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10494937/
Abstract

Go is a classical Chinese mind game and a highly popular intellectual pursuit in East Asia. In a survey at two Go tournaments (one of them the largest in Europe), we measured cognitive reflection and decision in strategic games (using the classical "beauty contest" game) ( = 327). We found that Go players in our survey had outstanding average cognitive reflection test (CRT) scores: 2.51 among all participants and 2.80 among players of high master level (dan). This value easily outperforms previous measurements, for example, of undergraduates at top universities. The CRT score was closely related to the playing strength, but not to the frequency of playing. On the other hand, frequent players tended to have higher theory of mind, regardless of their playing strengths. However, selfreported patience was not statistically significantly correlated with Go strength or playing frequency.

摘要

围棋是一种古典的中国智力游戏,在东亚地区是一项非常受欢迎的智力活动。在两项围棋比赛(其中一项是欧洲最大的比赛之一)的调查中,我们在战略游戏中测量了认知反思和决策(使用经典的“选美比赛”游戏)(= 327)。我们发现,在我们的调查中,围棋棋手的平均认知反思测试(CRT)分数非常出色:所有参与者的平均分为2.51,高段位(段)棋手的平均分为2.80。这个数值轻松超过了之前的测量结果,例如顶尖大学本科生的测量结果。CRT分数与棋力密切相关,但与下棋频率无关。另一方面,频繁下棋的棋手往往具有更高的心理理论,无论其棋力如何。然而,自我报告的耐心与围棋棋力或下棋频率在统计学上没有显著相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/f6dedcd92577/acp-17-2-328-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/e3722110909a/acp-17-2-328-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/38acd71d95ac/acp-17-2-328-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/c32f663cecf6/acp-17-2-328-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/0ecde90f4e31/acp-17-2-328-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/3f2f22e724d3/acp-17-2-328-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/aa99dba08ef9/acp-17-2-328-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/6298279d864f/acp-17-2-328-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/cbd8800a9778/acp-17-2-328-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/e48f7ed675e4/acp-17-2-328-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/b7bd8f8e006e/acp-17-2-328-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/7faf802190d4/acp-17-2-328-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/7121e362787e/acp-17-2-328-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/f6dedcd92577/acp-17-2-328-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/e3722110909a/acp-17-2-328-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/38acd71d95ac/acp-17-2-328-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/c32f663cecf6/acp-17-2-328-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/0ecde90f4e31/acp-17-2-328-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/3f2f22e724d3/acp-17-2-328-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/aa99dba08ef9/acp-17-2-328-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/6298279d864f/acp-17-2-328-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/cbd8800a9778/acp-17-2-328-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/e48f7ed675e4/acp-17-2-328-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/b7bd8f8e006e/acp-17-2-328-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/7faf802190d4/acp-17-2-328-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/7121e362787e/acp-17-2-328-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7845/10494937/f6dedcd92577/acp-17-2-328-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive Reflection and Theory of Mind of Go Players.围棋棋手的认知反思与心理理论
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2021 May 21;17(2):117-128. doi: 10.5709/acp-0322-6. eCollection 2021.
2
Autism does not limit strategic thinking in the "beauty contest" game.自闭症并不限制在“选美比赛”游戏中的策略性思考。
Cognition. 2017 Mar;160:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.015. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
3
Enhanced Dorsal Attention Network to Salience Network Interaction in Video Gamers During Sensorimotor Decision-Making Tasks.在感觉运动决策任务期间,电子游戏玩家中背侧注意网络与突显网络之间增强的交互作用。
Brain Connect. 2023 Mar;13(2):97-106. doi: 10.1089/brain.2021.0193. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
4
Methylphenidate, modafinil, and caffeine for cognitive enhancement in chess: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial.哌醋甲酯、莫达非尼和咖啡因对提高象棋认知能力的作用:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017 Mar;27(3):248-260. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
5
Influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity levels of university players: a cross-sectional study.《宝可梦 究极异兽》对大学生玩家身体活动水平的影响:一项横断面研究。 (注:这里原文中的“Pokémon Go”可能有误,根据语境推测正确名称应该是“Pokémon Ultra Beast”,所以按照推测的正确名称进行了翻译,如果原文无误,请根据实际情况调整) 以上是纠正错误后的翻译,如果原文确实是“Pokémon Go”,那么译文为:《宝可梦 去吧》对大学生玩家身体活动水平的影响:一项横断面研究。 但“Pokémon Go”这种表述与常见的医学专业学术文献主题不太相符,所以推测原文有误的可能性较大。
Int J Health Geogr. 2017 Feb 22;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0080-1.
6
Wheelchair Basketball Competition Heart Rate Profile According to Players' Functional Classification, Tournament Level, Game Type, Game Quarter and Playing Time.根据运动员功能分级、比赛级别、比赛类型、比赛节次和上场时间划分的轮椅篮球比赛心率概况
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 15;10:773. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00773. eCollection 2019.
7
Stress and strategic decision-making in the beauty contest game.压力与美赛博弈中的策略决策。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Sep;38(9):1503-11. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
8
Fluid Intelligence and Cognitive Reflection in a Strategic Environment: Evidence from Dominance-Solvable Games.战略环境中的流体智力与认知反思:来自优势可解博弈的证据
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 10;7:1188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01188. eCollection 2016.
9
The Effects of Fifa 2015 Computer Games on Changes in Cognitive, Hormonal and Brain Waves Functions of Young Men Volunteers.2015年国际足联电脑游戏对青年男性志愿者认知、激素及脑电波功能变化的影响。
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jul;6(3):193-201.
10
Match analysis and the physiological demands of Australian football.澳式足球的比赛分析与生理需求。
Sports Med. 2010 Apr 1;40(4):347-60. doi: 10.2165/11531400-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Go and the Brain: Cognitive and Neural Impacts of Training.围棋与大脑:训练的认知和神经影响
Psychiatry Investig. 2025 Apr;22(4):357-364. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0387. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
2
Our tools redefine what it means to be us: perceived robotic agency decreases the importance of agency in humanity.我们的工具重新定义了身为人类的意义:感知到的机器人能动性降低了人类能动性的重要性。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 14;13(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02673-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Time for a true display of skill: Top players in League of Legends have better executive control.是时候真正展现技巧了:《英雄联盟》中的顶尖玩家拥有更好的执行控制能力。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Mar;204:103007. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103007. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
2
WHO IS 'BEHAVIORAL'? COGNITIVE ABILITY AND ANOMALOUS PREFERENCES.谁是“行为学意义上的”?认知能力与异常偏好。
J Eur Econ Assoc. 2013 Dec 1;11(6):1231-1255. doi: 10.1111/jeea.12055.
3
Exploring the relationship between video game expertise and fluid intelligence.探索电子游戏专业技能与流体智力之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 15;12(11):e0186621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186621. eCollection 2017.
4
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search.用深度神经网络和树搜索掌握围棋游戏。
Nature. 2016 Jan 28;529(7587):484-9. doi: 10.1038/nature16961.
5
Reading the Mind in the Eyes or reading between the lines? Theory of Mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face.从眼神中读懂心思还是从字里行间领会含义?心理理论在网络和面对面交流中对集体智慧的预测效果同样出色。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 16;9(12):e115212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115212. eCollection 2014.
6
Is a bird in the hand worth two in the future? Intertemporal choice, attachment and theory of mind in school-aged children.手中的鸟是否胜过未来的两只?学龄儿童的跨期选择、依恋和心理理论。
Front Psychol. 2014 May 23;5:483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00483. eCollection 2014.
7
Baduk (the Game of Go) Improved Cognitive Function and Brain Activity in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.围棋(围棋游戏)可改善注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的认知功能和大脑活动。
Psychiatry Investig. 2014 Apr;11(2):143-51. doi: 10.4306/pi.2014.11.2.143. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
8
Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach.认知反思测试能测量认知反思吗?一种数学建模方法。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):434-47. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9.
9
Exploring the brains of Baduk (Go) experts: gray matter morphometry, resting-state functional connectivity, and graph theoretical analysis.探索围棋(Go)专家的大脑:灰质形态测量学、静息态功能连接和图论分析。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2;7:633. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00633. eCollection 2013.
10
Dopamine, working memory, and training induced plasticity: implications for developmental research.多巴胺、工作记忆与训练诱导的可塑性:对发展研究的启示。
Dev Psychol. 2012 May;48(3):836-43. doi: 10.1037/a0026179. Epub 2011 Nov 21.