Department of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hippocampus. 2023 Nov;33(11):1171-1188. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23576. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
Spatial reconstruction, a method for evaluating how individuals remember the placement of objects, has traditionally been evaluated through the aggregate estimation of placement errors. However, this approach may obscure the nature of task errors. Specifically, recent data has suggested the importance of examining the precision of responses, as well as absolute performance on item-context bindings. In contrast to traditional analysis approaches based on the distance between the target and the reconstructed item, in this study we further explored three types of errors (swap error, global error, and local distance) that may all contribute to the distance, with particular emphasis on swap errors and local distance due to their associations with item-context bindings and memory precision, respectively. We examined these errors in children aged 3-18 years, making comparisons between children with typical development (TD) and children with Down syndrome (DS), a population with known memory challenges. As expected, older children outperformed younger children in terms of overall memory accuracy. Of importance is that we measured uneven maturational trajectories of memory abilities across the various error types. Specifically, both remembered locations (irrespective of object identity) and swap errors (object-location binding errors) align with the overall memory accuracy. Memory precision, as measured by local distance in simpler set size 2 trials, mirrored overall memory accuracy. However, for more complex set size 3 trials, local distance remained stable before age 8 and showed age-related change thereafter. The group with DS showed reduced precision compared to a TD matched group, and measures of precision, and to a lesser extent binding errors, correlated with standard neuropsychological outcomes. Overall, our study contributed to a fine-grained understanding of developing spatial memory ability in a large sample of typical developing children and a memory impaired population. These findings contribute to a growing body of research examining precision as a key factor in memory performance.
空间重构是一种评估个体如何记忆物体位置的方法,传统上通过对位置错误的总体估计来进行评估。然而,这种方法可能掩盖了任务错误的本质。具体来说,最近的数据表明,检查反应的精度以及项目-上下文绑定的绝对表现同样重要。与传统的基于目标与重构项目之间距离的分析方法不同,在本研究中,我们进一步探讨了三种可能导致距离的错误类型(交换错误、全局错误和局部距离),特别强调了交换错误和局部距离,因为它们分别与项目-上下文绑定和记忆精度有关。我们检查了 3-18 岁儿童的这些错误,比较了具有典型发育(TD)和唐氏综合征(DS)的儿童之间的差异,DS 是一个已知存在记忆挑战的群体。正如预期的那样,年龄较大的儿童在整体记忆准确性方面表现优于年龄较小的儿童。重要的是,我们测量了各种错误类型下记忆能力的不平衡成熟轨迹。具体来说,无论是记住的位置(不考虑物体身份)还是交换错误(物体-位置绑定错误)都与整体记忆准确性一致。记忆精度,如在更简单的集合大小 2 试验中通过局部距离测量,反映了整体记忆准确性。然而,对于更复杂的集合大小 3 试验,局部距离在 8 岁之前保持稳定,之后才出现与年龄相关的变化。与 TD 匹配组相比,DS 组的精度降低,且精度测量值,在较小程度上是绑定错误,与标准神经心理学结果相关。总的来说,我们的研究在典型发育儿童和记忆受损人群的大样本中,对发展中的空间记忆能力进行了更细致的理解。这些发现有助于对记忆表现中精度作为关键因素的研究不断增加。