Suppr超能文献

PCR 检测 panel(FilmArray® Pneumonia Plus)对呼吸道标本中呼吸道细菌病原体检测性能的评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Performance evaluation of a PCR panel (FilmArray® Pneumonia Plus) for detection of respiratory bacterial pathogens in respiratory specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, Saint-Louis-Lariboisière Hospital Group, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Intensive Care Medicine Brabois, CHRU de Nancy, INSERM U1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France; INSERM UMR-S 942, MASCOT, Université de Paris, Paris, France.

出版信息

Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023 Dec;42(6):101300. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101300. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accuracy and timing of antibiotic therapy remain a challenge for lower respiratory tract infections. New molecular techniques using Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction, including the FilmArray® Pneumonia Plus Panel [FAPP], have been developed to address this. The aim of this study is to evaluate the FAPP diagnostic performance for the detection of the 15 typical bacteria of the panel from respiratory samples in a meta-analysis from a systematic review.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and EMBASE from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2022, and selected any study on the FAPP diagnostic performance on respiratory samples compared to the reference standard, bacterial culture. The main outcome was the overall diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity and specificity. We calculated the log Diagnostic Odds Ratio and analyzed performance for separate bacteria, antimicrobial resistance genes, and according to the sample type. We also reported the FAPP turnaround time and the out-of-panel bacteria number and species. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021226280).

RESULTS

From 10 317 records, we identified 30 studies including 8 968 samples. Twenty-one were related to intensive care. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 94% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 91-95] and 98% [95%CI 97-98], respectively. The log Diagnostic Odds Ratio was 6.35 [95%CI 6.05-6.65]. 9.3% [95%CI 9.2-9.5] of bacteria detected in culture were not included in the FAPP panel.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review reporting the FAPP evaluation revealed a high accuracy. This test may represent an adjunct tool for pulmonary bacterial infection diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship. Further evidence is needed to assess the impact on clinical outcome.

摘要

背景

抗生素治疗的准确性和及时性仍然是下呼吸道感染的一个挑战。新的分子技术,包括多重聚合酶链反应,已经被开发出来,以解决这个问题,包括 FilmArray®肺炎加面板[FAPP]。本研究的目的是通过对从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日进行的系统评价中的文献进行荟萃分析,评估 FAPP 对呼吸道样本中 15 种典型细菌的检测性能。

方法

我们在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 上进行了搜索,从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日,选择了任何关于 FAPP 对呼吸道样本的诊断性能的研究,与细菌培养的参考标准进行比较。主要结果是总体诊断准确性,包括敏感性和特异性。我们计算了对数诊断比值比,并根据样本类型分析了单独细菌、抗菌药物耐药基因的性能。我们还报告了 FAPP 的周转时间和不在面板中的细菌数量和种类。本研究已在 PROSPERO(CRD42021226280)注册。

结果

从 10317 条记录中,我们确定了 30 项研究,包括 8968 个样本。其中 21 项与重症监护有关。总体敏感性和特异性分别为 94%[95%置信区间(CI)91-95]和 98%[95%CI 97-98]。对数诊断比值比为 6.35[95%CI 6.05-6.65]。在培养中检测到的 9.3%[95%CI 9.2-9.5]的细菌不在 FAPP 面板中。

结论

本系统评价报告了 FAPP 的评估结果,显示出很高的准确性。该检测方法可能代表一种辅助工具,用于肺部细菌感染的诊断和抗菌药物管理。需要进一步的证据来评估其对临床结果的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验