Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14232. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14232. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
To describe the national rate of social risk factor screening adoption among federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), examine organizational factors associated with social risk screening adoption, and identify barriers to utilizing a standardized screening tool in 2020.
2020 Uniform Data System, a 100% sample of all US FQHCs (N = 1375).
We used multivariable linear probability models to assess the association between social risk screening adoption and key FQHC characteristics. We used descriptive statistics to describe variations in screening tool types and barriers to utilizing standardized tools. We thematically categorized open-ended responses about tools and barriers.
None.
In 2020, 68.9% of FQHCs screened patients for any social risk factors. Characteristics associated with a greater likelihood of screening adoption included having high proportions of patients best served in a language other than English (18.8 percentage point [PP] increase, 95% CI: 6.0, 31.6) and being larger in size (10.3 PP increase, 95% CI: 0.7, 20.0). Having higher proportions of uninsured patients (14.2 PP decrease, 95% CI: -25.5, -0.3) and participating in Medicaid-managed care contracts (7.3 PP decrease, 95% CI: -14.2, -0.3) were associated with lower screening likelihood. Among screening FQHCs, the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE) was the most common tool (47.1%). Among non-screening FQHCs, common barriers to using a standardized tool included lack of staff training to discuss social issues (25.2%), inability to include screening in patient intake (21.7%), and lack of funding for addressing social needs (19.2%).
Though most FQHCs screened for social risk factors in 2020, various barriers have prevented nearly 1 in 3 FQHCs from adopting a screening tool. Policies that provide FQHCs with resources to support training and workflow changes may increase screening uptake and facilitate engagement with other sectors.
描述联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)采用社会风险因素筛查的全国率,研究与社会风险筛查采用相关的组织因素,并确定 2020 年利用标准化筛查工具的障碍。
2020 年统一数据系统,这是全美所有 FQHC 的 100%样本(N=1375)。
我们使用多变量线性概率模型评估社会风险筛查采用与 FQHC 关键特征之间的关联。我们使用描述性统计来描述筛查工具类型的变化和利用标准化工具的障碍。我们对有关工具和障碍的开放式回答进行主题分类。
无。
2020 年,68.9%的 FQHC 对任何社会风险因素筛查患者。与更有可能进行筛查采用相关的特征包括有较高比例的以英语以外的语言为最佳服务的患者(18.8 个百分点增加,95%CI:6.0,31.6)和规模较大(10.3 个百分点增加,95%CI:0.7,20.0)。拥有较高比例的未参保患者(14.2 个百分点减少,95%CI:-25.5,-0.3)和参与医疗补助管理式医疗合同(7.3 个百分点减少,95%CI:-14.2,-0.3)与较低的筛查可能性相关。在进行筛查的 FQHC 中,应对和评估患者资产、风险和经验的方案(PRAPARE)是最常用的工具(47.1%)。在未进行筛查的 FQHC 中,使用标准化工具的常见障碍包括缺乏讨论社会问题的员工培训(25.2%)、无法将筛查纳入患者入组(21.7%)以及缺乏解决社会需求的资金(19.2%)。
尽管大多数 FQHC 在 2020 年筛查社会风险因素,但各种障碍使近 1/3 的 FQHC 无法采用筛查工具。为 FQHC 提供资源以支持培训和工作流程变更的政策可能会增加筛查采用率,并促进与其他部门的合作。