Ogle Kathleen Y, Hill Jeffery, Santen Sally A, Gottlieb Michael, Artino Anthony R
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington DC USA.
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Sep 15;7(5):e10906. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10906. eCollection 2023 Oct.
In this paper, we take the lessons learned from designing a survey and collecting validity evidence and prepare to administer the survey for research. We focus specifically on how researchers can reach individuals in the target population, methods of contact and engagement, evidence-informed factors that enhance participation, and recommendations for follow-up with nonrespondents. We also discuss the challenges of survey administration and provide guidance for navigating low response rates. Surveys are a common tool used to evaluate educational initiatives and collect data for all types of research. However, many clinician educators conducting survey-based evaluation and research may struggle to efficiently administer their survey. As a result, they often struggle to obtain appropriate response rates and thus may have difficulty publishing their survey results. Previous papers in this series focused on the initial steps of survey development and validation, but it is equally important to understand how best to administer your survey to obtain meaningful responses from a representative sample.
在本文中,我们汲取了设计调查问卷和收集效度证据的经验教训,并准备开展该调查以进行研究。我们特别关注研究人员如何接触目标人群中的个体、接触和参与的方法、提高参与度的循证因素以及对无回应者进行跟进的建议。我们还讨论了调查实施过程中的挑战,并为应对低回应率提供指导。调查是用于评估教育举措和收集各类研究数据的常用工具。然而,许多进行基于调查的评估和研究的临床教育工作者可能难以高效地实施他们的调查。因此,他们常常难以获得合适的回应率,进而可能在发表调查结果时遇到困难。本系列之前的论文聚焦于调查问卷开发和验证的初始步骤,但同样重要的是要了解如何以最佳方式实施调查,以便从具有代表性的样本中获得有意义的回应。