• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for developing high-quality multiple-choice questions.教育者的蓝图:开发高质量多项选择题的操作指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jan 24;7(1):e10836. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10836. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for creating a high-quality infographic.教育者蓝图:制作高质量信息图表的操作指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Aug 25;6(4):e10793. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10793. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for creating high-quality slides.教育工作者的蓝图:制作高质量幻灯片的操作指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Sep 1;8(5):e11022. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11022. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Educator's blueprint: A primer on consensus methods in medical education research.教育者蓝图:医学教育研究中的共识方法入门
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jul 11;7(4):e10891. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10891. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for survey design.教育者蓝图:调查设计操作指南
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Aug 23;6(4):e10796. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10796. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Writing cognitive educational objectives and multiple-choice test questions.编写认知教育目标和多项选择题
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1998 Nov 15;55(22):2397-401. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/55.22.2397.
7
A guide to creating an educator's portfolio for the 21st century.21世纪教育工作者作品集创建指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Feb 1;8(1):e10931. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10931. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for creating analog serious games for learning in medical education.教育者蓝图:为医学教育中的学习创建模拟严肃游戏的操作指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Nov 29;7(6):e10907. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10907. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Professional development: a guide to the educator's portfolio.专业发展:教育工作者档案指南。
Am J Physiol. 1996 Dec;271(6 Pt 3):S10-3. doi: 10.1152/advances.1996.271.6.S10.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of driving versus undistracted listening on podcast knowledge acquisition and retention using a driving simulator: A randomized, cross-over trial.使用驾驶模拟器比较驾驶与未分心收听对播客知识获取和记忆的影响:一项随机交叉试验。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 8;20(9):e0331299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331299. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of a long term faculty development program on improvement in quality of MCQs: an impact evaluation study.长期教师发展计划对改进多项选择题质量的影响:一项影响评估研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07081-2.
3
Evaluating the multiple-choice questions quality at the College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia: a three-year experience.评估沙特阿拉伯比沙大学医学院多项选择题的质量:三年经验
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06700-2.
4
ESTRO guidelines for developing questionnaires in survey-based radiation oncology research.欧洲放射肿瘤学会关于在基于调查的放射肿瘤学研究中制定问卷的指南。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024 Nov 24;51:100895. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100895. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Reducing Pharmaceuticals in Water, a New Module Integrated in the Pharmacy Game: Evaluating the Module's Effects on Students' Knowledge and Attitudes.减少水中的药物残留,药学游戏中的一个新模块:评估该模块对学生知识和态度的影响。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Feb 6;12(1):28. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12010028.

本文引用的文献

1
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for creating a high-quality infographic.教育者蓝图:制作高质量信息图表的操作指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Aug 25;6(4):e10793. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10793. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Introducing multiple-choice questions to promote learning for medical students: effect on exam performance in obstetrics and gynecology.引入多选题以促进医学生学习:对妇产科考试成绩的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;302(6):1401-1406. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05758-1. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?选择医学评估:多项选择题能达标吗?
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2018 May-Aug;31(2):65-71. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_229_17.
4
A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework.效度论证的当代方法:凯恩框架实用指南
Med Educ. 2015 Jun;49(6):560-75. doi: 10.1111/medu.12678.
5
An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis.评估多选题中的干扰项的功能和非功能:描述性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2009 Jul 7;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-40.
6
The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.违反标准试题编写原则对考试及学生的影响:医学教育中使用有缺陷的试题对成绩考试的后果。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005;10(2):133-43. doi: 10.1007/s10459-004-4019-5.
7
Construct-irrelevant variance and flawed test questions: Do multiple-choice item-writing principles make any difference?与结构无关的方差和有缺陷的测试问题:多项选择题编写原则有作用吗?
Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10 Suppl):S103-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200210001-00032.

教育者的蓝图:开发高质量多项选择题的操作指南。

Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for developing high-quality multiple-choice questions.

作者信息

Gottlieb Michael, Bailitz John, Fix Megan, Shappell Eric, Wagner Mary Jo

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA.

出版信息

AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jan 24;7(1):e10836. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10836. eCollection 2023 Feb.

DOI:10.1002/aet2.10836
PMID:36711253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9873868/
Abstract

Multiple-choice questions are commonly used for assessing learners' knowledge, as part of educational programs and scholarly endeavors. To ensure that questions accurately assess the learners and provide meaningful data, it is important to understand best practices in multiple-choice question design. This Educator's Blueprint paper provides 10 strategies for developing high-quality multiple-choice questions. These strategies include determining the purpose, objectives, and scope of the question; assembling a writing team; writing succinctly; asking questions that assess knowledge and comprehension rather than test-taking ability; ensuring consistent and independent answer choices; using plausible foils; avoiding grouped options; selecting the ideal response number and order; writing high-quality explanations; and gathering validity evidence before and evaluating the questions after use.

摘要

多项选择题作为教育项目和学术活动的一部分,常用于评估学习者的知识。为确保问题能准确评估学习者并提供有意义的数据,了解多项选择题设计的最佳实践很重要。这份教育工作者蓝图文件提供了10条开发高质量多项选择题的策略。这些策略包括确定问题的目的、目标和范围;组建写作团队;简洁写作;提出评估知识和理解而非应试能力的问题;确保答案选项一致且独立;使用似是而非的干扰项;避免分组选项;选择理想的答案数量和顺序;撰写高质量的解释;在使用前收集效度证据并在使用后评估问题。