• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估和分类印度劳动力工作相关压力(TAWS-16)的新工具的可靠性。

Reliability of a Newly Developed Tool to Assess and Classify Work-related Stress (TAWS-16) for Indian Workforce.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.

Department of Biostatistics, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.

出版信息

J Prev Med Public Health. 2023 Sep;56(5):407-412. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.23.219. Epub 2023 Aug 19.

DOI:10.3961/jpmph.23.219
PMID:37735832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10579639/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Work stress is associated with non-communicable diseases, increased healthcare costs, and decreased work productivity among employees in the information technology sector. There is a need for regular work-stress screening among employees using valid and reliable tools. The Tool to Assess and Classify Work Stress (TAWS-16) was developed to overcome limitations in existing stress assessment tools in India. This study aimed to test the reliability of TAWS-16 in a sample of managerial-supervisory employees.

METHODS

This observational reliability study included data from 62 employees. Test-retest and inter-method reliability were investigated using a TAWS-16 web application and interview by telephone, respectively. Kappa values and intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated. Internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

For both test-retest and inter-method reliability, the agreement for both work-related factors and symptoms suggestive of work stress exceeded 80%, and all kappa values were 0.40 or higher. Cronbach's alpha for test-retest and inter-method reliability was 0.983 and 0.941, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TAWS-16 demonstrated acceptable reliability. It measured stressors, coping abilities, and psychosomatic symptoms associated with work stress. We recommend using TAWS-16 to holistically identify work stress among employees during periodical health check-ups in India.

摘要

目的

工作压力与信息技术部门员工的非传染性疾病、医疗保健成本增加和工作生产力下降有关。需要使用有效和可靠的工具对员工进行定期工作压力筛查。为了克服印度现有压力评估工具的局限性,开发了工作压力评估和分类工具(TAWS-16)。本研究旨在测试 TAWS-16 在管理监督员工样本中的可靠性。

方法

这是一项观察性可靠性研究,纳入了 62 名员工的数据。使用 TAWS-16 网络应用程序和电话访谈分别评估了测试-重测和跨方法的可靠性。计算了 Kappa 值和组内相关系数。通过 Cronbach's alpha 评估内部一致性。

结果

无论是测试-重测还是跨方法的可靠性,工作相关因素和提示工作压力的症状的一致性均超过 80%,所有 Kappa 值均为 0.40 或更高。测试-重测和跨方法可靠性的 Cronbach's alpha 分别为 0.983 和 0.941。

结论

TAWS-16 表现出可接受的可靠性。它测量了与工作压力相关的压力源、应对能力和身心症状。我们建议在印度定期健康检查期间使用 TAWS-16 全面识别员工的工作压力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d6/10579639/3c9c6fd45ea9/jpmph-23-219f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d6/10579639/3c9c6fd45ea9/jpmph-23-219f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37d6/10579639/3c9c6fd45ea9/jpmph-23-219f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of a Newly Developed Tool to Assess and Classify Work-related Stress (TAWS-16) for Indian Workforce.评估和分类印度劳动力工作相关压力(TAWS-16)的新工具的可靠性。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2023 Sep;56(5):407-412. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.23.219. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
2
Face, content, criterion and construct validity assessment of a newly developed tool to assess and classify work-related stress (TAWS- 16).评估和分类工作相关压力的新工具(TAWS-16)的表面效度、内容效度、准则效度和结构效度评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0280189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280189. eCollection 2023.
3
Levels of work stress among information technology professionals during COVID-19 pandemic in an Indian metropolis.印度一座大都市中信息技术专业人员在新冠疫情期间的工作压力水平。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Feb;13(2):674-680. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1199_23. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
4
Development and validation of tools to screen occupational mental health and workplace factors influencing it: for the Indian workforce.开发和验证用于筛查职业心理健康和影响其的工作场所因素的工具:针对印度劳动力。
Ind Health. 2023 Jun 3;61(3):184-194. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2022-0019. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
5
Work-Related Stress Questionnaire (WRSQ): a new tool to assess psychosocial risks at workplaces.工作相关压力问卷(WRSQ):一种评估工作场所心理社会风险的新工具。
Clin Ter. 2020 Jul-Aug;171(4):e316-e320. doi: 10.7417/CT.2020.2235.
6
Measuring illness beliefs in patients with lower extremity injuries: reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping questionnaire (SPOC-NL).测量下肢损伤患者的疾病认知:荷兰版躯体先占观念与应对问卷(SPOC-NL)的信效度
Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.042. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
7
Role of demographic and job-related variables in determining work-related quality of life of hospital employees.人口统计学和工作相关变量在决定医院员工工作相关生活质量方面的作用。
J Postgrad Med. 2017 Jan-Mar;63(1):4-10. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.192794.
8
[Development of the Brief Scales for Coping Profile (BSCP) for workers: basic information about its reliability and validity].[劳动者应对概况简表(BSCP)的编制:关于其信效度的基本信息]
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2004 Jul;46(4):103-14. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.46.103.
9
[A Screening-Tool for Three Dimensions of Work-Related Behavior and Experience Patterns in the Psychosomatic Rehabilitation - A Proposal for a Short-Form of the Occupational Stress and Coping Inventory (AVEM-3D)].[一种用于身心康复中与工作相关行为和体验模式三维度的筛查工具——职业压力与应对量表简版(AVEM - 3D)的建议]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2016 Dec;55(6):348-356. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-120232. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
10
Validation of the work stress screener (WOSS-13) and resilience at work scale (ReWoS-24).工作压力筛查器(WOSS-13)和工作韧性量表(ReWoS-24)的验证。
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Sep;160:110989. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110989. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Face, content, criterion and construct validity assessment of a newly developed tool to assess and classify work-related stress (TAWS- 16).评估和分类工作相关压力的新工具(TAWS-16)的表面效度、内容效度、准则效度和结构效度评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0280189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280189. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Face, content, criterion and construct validity assessment of a newly developed tool to assess and classify work-related stress (TAWS- 16).评估和分类工作相关压力的新工具(TAWS-16)的表面效度、内容效度、准则效度和结构效度评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0280189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280189. eCollection 2023.
2
Work ability assessment in a worker population: comparison and determinants of Work Ability Index and Work Ability score.工作人群的工作能力评估:工作能力指数和工作能力得分的比较和决定因素。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 8;13:305. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-305.
3
A study on professional stress, depression and alcohol use among Indian IT professionals.
一项针对印度 IT 专业人员职业压力、抑郁和饮酒问题的研究。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;55(1):63-9. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.105512.
4
The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics.工作内容问卷(JCQ):一种用于心理社会工作特征国际比较评估的工具。
J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322-55. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.322.
5
Work role inventory: a guide to job satisfaction.
Nurs Manage. 1993 Jan;24(1):54-6, 60, 62.
6
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.分类数据观察者一致性的测量。
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.