Sevilya Ziv, Kuzmina Alona, Cipok Michal, Hershkovitz Vera, Keidar-Friedman Danielle, Taube Ran, Lev Eli I
Cardiology Department, Assuta Ashdod Medical Center, Ashdod, Israel.
The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Nov;56(4):538-547. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02891-x. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
COVID-19 disease is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic complications, which contribute to high short-term mortality. Patients with COVID-19 demonstrate enhanced platelet turnover and reactivity, which may have a role in the development of thrombotic events and disease severity. Evidence has suggested direct interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and platelets, resulting in platelets activation. Here, we compare the effect of various SARS-CoV-2 spike variants on platelet activation. Engineered lentiviral particles were pseudotyped with spike SARS-CoV-2 variants and incubated with Platelet Rich Plasma obtained from healthy individuals. The pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 exhibiting the wild-type Wuhan-Hu spike protein stimulated platelets to increase expression of the surface CD62P and activated αIIbβ3 markers by 3.5 ± 1.2 and 3.3 ± 0.7 fold, respectively (P = 0.004 and 0.003). The Delta variant induced much higher levels of platelet activation; CD62P expression was increased by 6.6 ± 2.2 fold and activated αIIbβ3 expression was increased by 5.0 ± 1.5 fold (P = 0.005 and 0.026, respectively). The Omicron BA.1 and the Alpha variants induced the lowest level of activation; CD62P expression was increased by 1.7 ± 0.4 and 1.6 ± 0.9 fold, respectively (P = 0.003 and 0.008), and activated αIIbβ3 expression by 1.8 ± 1.1 and 1.6 ± 0.8, respectively (P = 0.003 and 0.001). The Omicron BA.2 variant induced an increase of platelets activation comparable to the Wuhan-Hu (2.8 ± 1.2 and 2.1 ± 1.3 fold for CD62P and activated αIIbβ3 markers, respectively). The results obtained for various COVID-19 variants are in correlation with the clinical severity and mortality reported for these variants.
新冠病毒疾病与血栓形成并发症风险增加相关,这是导致短期高死亡率的原因之一。新冠病毒患者表现出血小板周转率和反应性增强,这可能在血栓形成事件和疾病严重程度的发展中起作用。有证据表明,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)与血小板之间存在直接相互作用,从而导致血小板活化。在此,我们比较了各种SARS-CoV-2刺突变异体对血小板活化的影响。用SARS-CoV-2刺突变异体对工程化慢病毒颗粒进行假型化处理,并与从健康个体获得的富血小板血浆孵育。表现出野生型武汉-胡刺突蛋白的假型化SARS-CoV-2刺激血小板,使表面CD62P的表达和活化的αIIbβ3标志物分别增加3.5±1.2倍和3.3±0.7倍(P=0.004和0.003)。德尔塔变异体诱导的血小板活化水平要高得多;CD62P表达增加6.6±2.2倍,活化的αIIbβ3表达增加5.0±1.5倍(分别为P=0.005和0.026)。奥密克戎BA.1和阿尔法变异体诱导的活化水平最低;CD62P表达分别增加1.7±0.4倍和1.6±0.9倍(P=0.003和0.008),活化的αIIbβ3表达分别增加1.8±1.1倍和1.6±0.8倍(P=0.003和0.001)。奥密克戎BA.2变异体诱导的血小板活化增加程度与武汉-胡变异体相当(CD62P和活化的αIIbβ3标志物分别为2.8±1.2倍和2.1±1.3倍)。针对各种新冠病毒变异体获得的结果与这些变异体报告的临床严重程度和死亡率相关。