Wilson-Mendenhall Christine D, Holmes Kevin J
Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Department of Psychology, Reed College, Portland, OR USA.
Affect Sci. 2023 Aug 7;4(3):591-599. doi: 10.1007/s42761-023-00200-6. eCollection 2023 Sep.
We join others in envisioning a future for affective science that addresses society's most pressing needs. To move toward this vision, we consider a research paradigm that emerged in other disciplines: use-inspired basic research. This paradigm transcends the traditional basic-applied dichotomy, which pits the basic goal of fundamental scientific against the applied goal of in solving social problems. In reality, these goals are complementary, and use-inspired basic research advances them simultaneously. Here, we build a case for use-inspired basic research-how it differs from traditional basic science and why affective scientists should engage in it. We first examine how use-inspired basic research challenges problematic assumptions of a strict basic-applied dichotomy. We then discuss how it is consistent with advances in affective science that recognize context specificity as the norm and consider ethical issues of use being a complementary goal. Following this theoretical discussion, we differentiate the implementation of use-inspired basic research from that of traditional basic science. We draw on examples from recent research to illustrate differences: social problems as a starting point, stakeholder and community engagement, and integration of research and service. In conclusion, we invite affective scientists to embrace the "lab meets world" perspective of use-inspired basic research as a promising pathway to real-world impact.
我们与其他人一道展望情感科学的未来,以满足社会最紧迫的需求。为了朝着这一愿景迈进,我们考虑一种在其他学科中出现的研究范式:以应用为导向的基础研究。这种范式超越了传统的基础研究与应用研究的二分法,后者将基础科学的基本目标与解决社会问题的应用目标对立起来。实际上,这些目标是相辅相成的,以应用为导向的基础研究能同时推动它们的发展。在此,我们阐述以应用为导向的基础研究的理由——它与传统基础科学有何不同,以及情感科学家为何应参与其中。我们首先审视以应用为导向的基础研究如何挑战严格的基础研究与应用研究二分法中存在问题的假设。然后,我们讨论它如何与情感科学的进展相一致,这些进展将情境特异性视为常态,并将应用的伦理问题视为一个互补的目标。在这一理论讨论之后,我们区分以应用为导向的基础研究与传统基础科学的实施方式。我们借鉴近期研究的例子来说明差异:以社会问题为起点、利益相关者和社区参与,以及研究与服务的整合。总之,我们邀请情感科学家接受以应用为导向的基础研究中“实验室与现实世界接轨”的观点,将其作为实现现实世界影响的一条有前景的途径。