Suppr超能文献

关于成瘾病因的相互冲突的理论以及物质使用障碍疾病模型的优势与局限性。

Conflicting theories on addiction aetiology and the strengths and limitations of substance use disorder disease modelling.

作者信息

Greener Megan R, Storr Sarah J

机构信息

Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Mol Neurosci. 2023 Sep 6;16:1166852. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1166852. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

A lack of cross-disciplinary unanimity prevails within addiction research. Theories conceptualizing addiction through the three-stage brain disease model contest other theories that substance use disorder is of behavioural or genetic origin. The reverberations of this lack of consensus are noticeable throughout addiction research and within the foundations of disease modelling. The availability of methods to investigate substance use disorder are inconsistent and sometimes unrepresentative. This review discusses theories of addiction aetiology, available models for addiction research and the strengths and limitations of current practical experimental methods of study.

摘要

成瘾研究领域存在跨学科意见不一致的情况。通过三阶段脑疾病模型将成瘾概念化的理论与其他认为物质使用障碍源于行为或遗传的理论相互竞争。这种缺乏共识的影响在整个成瘾研究以及疾病建模基础中都很明显。用于研究物质使用障碍的方法并不一致,有时还缺乏代表性。本综述讨论了成瘾病因学理论、成瘾研究的可用模型以及当前实际实验研究方法的优缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/10511750/41e811fe39f8/fnmol-16-1166852-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验