Suppr超能文献

关于成瘾病因的相互冲突的理论以及物质使用障碍疾病模型的优势与局限性。

Conflicting theories on addiction aetiology and the strengths and limitations of substance use disorder disease modelling.

作者信息

Greener Megan R, Storr Sarah J

机构信息

Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Mol Neurosci. 2023 Sep 6;16:1166852. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1166852. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

A lack of cross-disciplinary unanimity prevails within addiction research. Theories conceptualizing addiction through the three-stage brain disease model contest other theories that substance use disorder is of behavioural or genetic origin. The reverberations of this lack of consensus are noticeable throughout addiction research and within the foundations of disease modelling. The availability of methods to investigate substance use disorder are inconsistent and sometimes unrepresentative. This review discusses theories of addiction aetiology, available models for addiction research and the strengths and limitations of current practical experimental methods of study.

摘要

成瘾研究领域存在跨学科意见不一致的情况。通过三阶段脑疾病模型将成瘾概念化的理论与其他认为物质使用障碍源于行为或遗传的理论相互竞争。这种缺乏共识的影响在整个成瘾研究以及疾病建模基础中都很明显。用于研究物质使用障碍的方法并不一致,有时还缺乏代表性。本综述讨论了成瘾病因学理论、成瘾研究的可用模型以及当前实际实验研究方法的优缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/10511750/41e811fe39f8/fnmol-16-1166852-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验