Elhouderi Eiman, Elsawalhy Eman, Al-Sudani Najlaa, Mahmood Irum, Sengstock David
Internal Medicine, Beaumont Health, Dearborn, USA.
Internal Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dearborn, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 23;15(8):e43980. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43980. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Importance There are conflicting data regarding the safety of the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) medications in hypertensive patients who are susceptible to COVID-19. Objective Our study assesses the association between COVID-19 severity and mortality and the use of ACEIs/ARBs among hospitalized patients with hypertension. Research design, setting, and participants This was a retrospective cohort study. Using the EPIC system of Beaumont Health, Dearborn, Michigan, we identified 5490 patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to the eight Beaumont hospitals. After excluding subjects who have no hypertension and those with missing data, we included 2129 COVID-19 patients who have hypertension. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association between history of ACEI/ARB use, intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, and COVID-19 mortality. Exposure Exposure refers to the use of ACEIs/ARBs as documented in the medical records before admission to the hospitals. Main outcome The main outcome was 30-day COVID-19 mortality and ICU admission rates. Results There were 1281 subjects (60%) with prior ACEI/ARB use and 848 subjects (40%) with no ACEI/ARB use. There was no significant association between ICU admission and the use of ACEIs/ARBs (odds ratio {OR} = 0.95, 95% CI = {0.76, 1.19}, p-value = 0.6). Although the unadjusted logistic regression model demonstrated a statistically significant association between history of ACEI/ARB use and COVID-19 mortality (odds ratio = 1.31, 95% CI = {1.05, 1.66}, p-value = 0.02), the adjusted logistic regression model failed to show this statistically significant association (odds ratio = 1.20, 95% CI = {0.93, 1.54}, p-value = 0.14). Moreover, we were not able to reveal a statistically significant association between 30-day COVID-19 survival and prior use of ACEI/ARB in the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio {HR} = 1.11, 95% CI = {0.91, 1.40}, p-value = 0.14). Conclusion In this large retrospective study, we conclude that there was no statistically significant association between prior history of ACEI/ARB use and COVID-19 ICU admission rates or mortality in hypertensive patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
重要性 关于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ACEI/ARB)类药物在易感染2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的高血压患者中使用的安全性,存在相互矛盾的数据。目的 我们的研究评估了COVID-19严重程度和死亡率与住院高血压患者使用ACEI/ARB之间的关联。研究设计、背景和参与者 这是一项回顾性队列研究。利用密歇根州迪尔伯恩市博蒙特健康中心的EPIC系统,我们确定了5490例入住博蒙特八家医院的COVID-19患者。在排除无高血压患者和数据缺失患者后,我们纳入了2129例患有高血压的COVID-19患者。采用逻辑回归和Cox比例风险模型分析ACEI/ARB使用史、重症监护病房(ICU)入住率与COVID-19死亡率之间的关联。暴露 暴露是指入院前病历中记录的ACEI/ARB使用情况。主要结局 主要结局是30天COVID-19死亡率和ICU入住率。结果 有1281名受试者(60%)曾使用过ACEI/ARB,848名受试者(40%)未使用过ACEI/ARB。ICU入住与ACEI/ARB使用之间无显著关联(比值比{OR}=0.95,95%置信区间={0.76,1.19},p值=0.6)。尽管未调整的逻辑回归模型显示ACEI/ARB使用史与COVID-19死亡率之间存在统计学显著关联(比值比=1.31,95%置信区间={1.05,1.66},p值=0.02),但调整后的逻辑回归模型未能显示这种统计学显著关联(比值比=1.20,95%置信区间={0.93,1.54},p值=0.14)。此外,在调整后的Cox比例风险模型中,我们未能揭示30天COVID-19生存率与先前使用ACEI/ARB之间的统计学显著关联(风险比{HR}=1.11,95%置信区间={0.91,1.40},p值=0.14)。结论 在这项大型回顾性研究中,我们得出结论,在因COVID-19住院的高血压患者中,ACEI/ARB使用史与COVID-19 ICU入住率或死亡率之间无统计学显著关联。