Demiral Mehmet, Demiral Özge
Department of Economics, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Türkiye.
Department of International Trade and Logistics, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Türkiye.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 1;347:119027. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119027. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
A vast literature has examined the empirical link between gross exports and total carbon emissions for different country groups. However, countries' increasing participation in global value chains (GVCs) challenges this traditional approach since the gross measures neglect trade-embodied carbon emissions and intermediates-driven value-added trade. Therefore, this study scrutinizes how backward participation (foreign contents in domestic exports) and forward participation (domestic contents in foreign exports) in GVCs affect per capita net exports of trade-embodied carbon dioxide emissions. The study adopts input-output accounting and value-added decomposition framework for Group of Seven (G7) and Emerging Seven (E7) countries over the 1995-2018 period. (i) Pre-estimation analyses reveal that the net carbon importer G7 group had a comparative advantage in high-tech exports and a lower export product concentration level, while the net carbon exporter E7 group had a comparative advantage in resource-intensive exports and a higher export product concentration level, albeit significant within-group heterogeneities. (ii) The augmented mean group estimates reveal that increasing backward participation raises net carbon exports for both G7 and E7. The forward participation-net carbon exports nexus is negative for G7 but positive for E7. (iii) While economic growth reduces net carbon exports in both groups, the effects of comparative advantages in resource-intensive and high-tech exports differ. Practitioners should be aware of the GVCs-driven carbon circle when assessing decarbonization performances and obligations of countries.
大量文献研究了不同国家集团总出口与碳排放总量之间的实证联系。然而,各国对全球价值链(GVC)参与度的不断提高对这种传统方法提出了挑战,因为总量衡量方法忽略了贸易中的隐含碳排放以及中间品驱动的增值贸易。因此,本研究仔细考察了全球价值链中的后向参与度(国内出口中的国外成分)和前向参与度(国外出口中的国内成分)如何影响贸易中二氧化碳排放的人均净出口。该研究采用1995 - 2018年期间七国集团(G7)和新兴七国(E7)的投入产出核算和增值分解框架。(i)预估计分析表明,净碳进口国G7集团在高科技出口方面具有比较优势,出口产品集中度较低,而净碳出口国E7集团在资源密集型出口方面具有比较优势,出口产品集中度较高,尽管组内存在显著差异。(ii)增强平均组估计结果显示,后向参与度的提高会增加G7和E7的净碳出口。前向参与度与净碳出口的关系对G7为负,对E7为正。(iii)虽然经济增长会减少两组的净碳出口,但资源密集型和高科技出口的比较优势的影响有所不同。在评估各国的脱碳表现和义务时,从业者应注意全球价值链驱动的碳循环。