• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多黏菌素 B 血液灌流治疗脓毒性休克患者:一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。

Endotoxin activity trend and multi-organ dysfunction in critically ill patients with septic shock, who received Polymyxin-B hemadsorption: A multicenter, prospective, observational study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2023 Aug;47(8):1361-1370. doi: 10.1111/aor.14534. Epub 2023 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1111/aor.14534
PMID:37767775
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The baseline endotoxin activity (EA) may predict the outcome of critically ill septic patients who receive Polymyxin-B hemadsorption (PMX-HA), however, the clinical implications of specific EA trends remain unknown.

METHODS

Subgroup analysis of the prospective, multicenter, observational study EUPHAS2. We included 50 critically ill patients with septic shock and EA ≥ 0.6, who received PMX-HA. The primary outcome of the study was the EA and SOFA score progression from T to 120 h afterwards (T). Secondary outcomes included the EA and SOFA score progression in whom had EA at 48 h (EA) < 0.6 (EA responders, EA-R) versus who had not (EA non-responders, EA-NR).

RESULTS

Septic shock was mainly caused by 27 abdominal (54%) and 17 pulmonary (34%) infections, predominantly due to Gram negative bacteria (39 patients, 78%). The SAPS II score was 67.5 [52.8-82.3] and predicted a mortality rate of 75%. Between T and T, the EA decreased (p < 0.001), while the SOFA score and the Inotropic Score (IS) improved (p < 0.001). In comparison with EA-NR (18 patients, 47%), the EA-R group (23 patients, 53%) showed faster IS improvement and lower requirement of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) during the ICU stay. Overall hospital mortality occurred in 18 patients (36%).

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients with septic shock and EA ≥ 0.6 who received PMX-HA, EA decreased and SOFA score improved over 120 h. In whom high EA resolved within 48 h, IS improvement was faster and CRRT requirement was lower compared with patients with EA ≥ 0.6.

摘要

背景

基线内毒素活性(EA)可预测接受多黏菌素 B 血液吸附(PMX-HA)的危重症脓毒症患者的结局,但特定 EA 趋势的临床意义尚不清楚。

方法

对前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究 EUPHAS2 的亚组分析。我们纳入了 50 例 EA≥0.6 的脓毒性休克患者,这些患者接受了 PMX-HA 治疗。该研究的主要结局是从 T 到 120 小时后 EA 和 SOFA 评分的进展(T)。次要结局包括 EA 在 48 小时(EA)<0.6 的患者(EA 应答者,EA-R)与 EA 未<0.6 的患者(EA 无应答者,EA-NR)的 EA 和 SOFA 评分的进展。

结果

脓毒性休克主要由 27 例腹部(54%)和 17 例肺部(34%)感染引起,主要由革兰氏阴性菌引起(39 例,78%)。SAPS II 评分为 67.5[52.8-82.3],预测死亡率为 75%。在 T 到 T 之间,EA 降低(p<0.001),而 SOFA 评分和正性肌力评分(IS)改善(p<0.001)。与 EA-NR(18 例,47%)相比,EA-R 组(23 例,53%)在 ICU 期间的 IS 改善更快,需要持续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)的比例更低。总住院死亡率为 18 例(36%)。

结论

在接受 PMX-HA 治疗的 EA≥0.6 的脓毒性休克危重症患者中,EA 在 120 小时内降低,SOFA 评分改善。在 48 小时内 EA 恢复正常的患者中,IS 改善更快,需要 CRRT 的比例更低。

相似文献

1
Endotoxin activity trend and multi-organ dysfunction in critically ill patients with septic shock, who received Polymyxin-B hemadsorption: A multicenter, prospective, observational study.多黏菌素 B 血液灌流治疗脓毒性休克患者:一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。
Artif Organs. 2023 Aug;47(8):1361-1370. doi: 10.1111/aor.14534. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
2
Endotoxin removal therapy with Polymyxin B immobilized fiber column: a single center experience from EUPHAS2 registry.聚季铵盐-24 纤维固定化柱对内毒素清除治疗:EUPHAS2 注册研究的单中心经验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 16;13(1):17600. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44850-9.
3
Polymyxin B hemoperfusion in coronavirus disease 2019 patients with endotoxic shock: Case series from EUPHAS2 registry.多黏菌素 B 血液灌流治疗 2019 冠状病毒病伴内毒素休克患者:EUPHAS2 登记研究的病例系列。
Artif Organs. 2021 Jun;45(6):E187-E194. doi: 10.1111/aor.13900. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
4
Impact of polymyxin B hemoperfusion therapy on high endotoxin activity level patients after successful infection source control: a prospective cohort study.聚明胶肽血液灌流治疗成功控制感染源后高内毒素血症患者的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 16;11(1):24132. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03055-8.
5
Clinical implications of endotoxin activity and Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion in critically ill patients with septic cardiomyopathy: A single-center, retrospective, observational study.内毒素活性及多粘菌素B血液灌流在脓毒性心肌病危重症患者中的临床意义:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究
Artif Organs. 2023 Dec;47(12):1865-1873. doi: 10.1111/aor.14645. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
6
PMX endotoxin removal in the clinical practice: results from the EUPHAS trial.临床实践中多粘菌素吸附柱内毒素清除:EUPHAS试验结果
Contrib Nephrol. 2010;167:83-90. doi: 10.1159/000315922. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
7
Targeted therapy using polymyxin B hemadsorption in patients with sepsis: a post-hoc analysis of the JSEPTIC-DIC study and the EUPHRATES trial.使用多黏菌素 B 血液吸附治疗脓毒症患者的靶向治疗:JSEPTIC-DIC 研究和 EUPHRATES 试验的事后分析。
Crit Care. 2023 Jun 21;27(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04533-3.
8
[Polymyxin-B direct hemoperfusion (PMX-DHP) in gram negative sepsis].[多黏菌素B直接血液灌流(PMX-DHP)治疗革兰阴性菌败血症]
G Ital Nefrol. 2006 May-Jun;23 Suppl 36:S94-102.
9
Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in abdominal septic shock: the EUPHAS randomized controlled trial.早期应用多粘菌素B血液灌流治疗腹部感染性休克:EUPHAS随机对照试验
JAMA. 2009 Jun 17;301(23):2445-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.856.
10
Polymyxin B-immobilised haemoperfusion and mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis/septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.多黏菌素B固定化血液灌流与脓毒症/脓毒性休克重症患者的死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 21;6(11):e012908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012908.

引用本文的文献

1
Endotoxin hemoadsorption in refractory septic shock with multiorgan dysfunction and extreme endotoxin activity.内毒素血液吸附用于伴有多器官功能障碍及极高内毒素活性的难治性感染性休克。
Crit Care. 2025 May 20;29(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05371-1.
2
Extracorporeal therapies in sepsis: a comprehensive review of the Selective Cytopheretic Device, Polymyxin B and Seraph cartridges.脓毒症的体外治疗:对选择性细胞去除装置、多粘菌素B和Seraph柱的全面综述
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2459349. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2459349. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
3
Current perspectives in the management of sepsis and septic shock.
脓毒症和感染性休克管理的当前观点
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 15;11:1431791. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1431791. eCollection 2024.
4
Capnocytophaga canimorsus Meningitis Complicated by Septic Shock: The Use of Extracorporeal Blood Purification Techniques.犬咬二氧化碳嗜纤维菌脑膜炎并发感染性休克:体外血液净化技术的应用
Cureus. 2024 May 7;16(5):e59841. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59841. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Catastrophic Disease: A Personalized Approach Based on Phenotypes and Treatable Traits.灾难性疾病:基于表型和可治疗特征的个性化方法。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Feb 15;13(2):187. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13020187.
6
Endotoxic Septic Shock: Diagnosis and Treatment.内毒素性感染性休克:诊断与治疗。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 10;24(22):16185. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216185.
7
Endotoxin removal therapy with Polymyxin B immobilized fiber column: a single center experience from EUPHAS2 registry.聚季铵盐-24 纤维固定化柱对内毒素清除治疗:EUPHAS2 注册研究的单中心经验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 16;13(1):17600. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44850-9.