Suppr超能文献

体位对颈髓损伤患者机械通气-呼气末正压通气时呼气峰流速的影响:一项初步研究。

Effect of body position on peak expiratory flow during mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in people with cervical spinal cord injury: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 2;13(1):16548. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43256-x.

Abstract

This prospective pilot study investigated the influence of body position on peak cough flow (PCF) during mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) treatment in people with tetraplegia. Fifteen participants with cervical spinal cord injury (C-SCI) were randomized into two groups, which differed in the starting position, that is, the patients were either supine or reclined. Four sessions of MI-E in alternating positions with each session comprising three different maneuvers: five voluntary coughs, five MI-E-assisted coughs, and five MI-E-assisted with manual thrusts were performed with continuous airflow measurement reporting PCF from every cough. PCF was associated with the application maneuvers, total insufflation volume (TIV), and interaction between position and maneuvers but not with the application position. The estimated mean PCF was 1.808, 3.529, and 3.925 L/s when supine and 1.672, 3.598, and 3.909 L/s when reclined from voluntary cough, MI-E, and MI-E with manual thrust, respectively. The estimated PCF change compared to voluntary cough was 1.721 (95% CI, 1.603-1.838) L/s from the combined MI-E and 2.116 (95% CI, 2.005-2.228) L/s from the MI-E with manual thrust, calculated from the linear mixed-model analysis. PCF moderately correlated with TIV (R = 0.64). Therefore, either position can be used for C-SCI patients as long as MI-E can be performed with manual thrust and sufficient TIV is provided.

摘要

本前瞻性初步研究调查了体位对机械通气-呼气(MI-E)治疗四肢瘫痪患者峰呼气流速(PCF)的影响。15 名颈髓损伤(C-SCI)患者随机分为两组,体位不同,即患者仰卧或斜卧。交替体位进行 4 次 MI-E,每次包括 3 种不同的动作:5 次自主咳嗽、5 次 MI-E 辅助咳嗽和 5 次 MI-E 辅助手动推压,连续气流测量报告每次咳嗽的 PCF。PCF 与应用动作、总通气量(TIV)以及体位与动作之间的相互作用有关,但与应用体位无关。仰卧位时,自主咳嗽、MI-E 和 MI-E 辅助手动推压的估计平均 PCF 分别为 1.808、3.529 和 3.925 L/s,斜卧位时分别为 1.672、3.598 和 3.909 L/s。从线性混合模型分析中计算,与自主咳嗽相比,联合 MI-E 的 PCF 变化为 1.721(95%CI,1.603-1.838)L/s,MI-E 加手动推压为 2.116(95%CI,2.005-2.228)L/s。PCF 与 TIV 中度相关(R=0.64)。因此,只要可以进行 MI-E 并提供足够的 TIV,就可以为 C-SCI 患者使用任何体位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1217/10545699/84542af09199/41598_2023_43256_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验