• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 大流行期间非正规护理对护理人员心理健康的影响。

Impact of informal care on the mental health of caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia.

Centre for Disability Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Nov 29;45(4):e668-e676. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad193.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdad193
PMID:37786356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10687605/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Informal care can affect the mental health of caregivers. The COVID-19 pandemic precipitated many people into informal care. Little is known about the longitudinal effect of informal care throughout the pandemic. We investigate changes in mental health in relation to changes in informal care between July 2020 and September 2021.

METHODS

Using data from Understanding Society, we applied fixed-effects modelling to assess mental health variations associated with changes in caregiving among 13 557 participants (50 430 observations). Hours of weekly care were categorized as 0, 1-19, ≥20. Mental health was measured using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) as a continuous score and a binary indicator. Main analyses were stratified by gender.

RESULTS

Compared to when delivering 0 hours care/week, the GHQ-12 scores of women providing care for 1-19 hours/week were 0.46 points higher (95%CI: -0.11, 1.09), while their mental health scores were 0.99 higher (95%: 0.08, 1.90) when caring for ≥20 hours/week. Changes on the binary GHQ-12 measure were only evident for women when providing ≥20 hours of weekly care. These changes were not substantial among men.

CONCLUSION

Informal care adversely impacted the mental health of women carers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Support programmes for informal carers should focus on alleviating caregiving loads in women.

摘要

背景

非正式护理会影响护理人员的心理健康。COVID-19 大流行使许多人成为非正式护理人员。对于整个大流行期间非正式护理的纵向影响知之甚少。我们调查了 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 9 月期间,与非正式护理变化相关的心理健康变化。

方法

使用来自“理解社会”的数据,我们应用固定效应模型来评估与 13557 名参与者(50430 次观察)的护理变化相关的心理健康变化。每周护理时间分为 0、1-19、≥20 小时。使用一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)作为连续评分和二进制指标来衡量心理健康。主要分析按性别分层。

结果

与每周提供 0 小时护理相比,每周提供 1-19 小时护理的女性的 GHQ-12 评分高 0.46 分(95%CI:-0.11,1.09),而当每周提供≥20 小时护理时,她们的心理健康评分高 0.99 分(95%:0.08,1.90)。仅当女性提供每周≥20 小时的护理时,才会在二进制 GHQ-12 测量中出现变化。这些变化在男性中并不明显。

结论

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,非正式护理对女性护理人员的心理健康产生了不利影响。非正式护理人员支持计划应重点减轻女性的护理负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0bb/10687605/e1a7c99c5177/fdad193f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0bb/10687605/e1a7c99c5177/fdad193f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0bb/10687605/e1a7c99c5177/fdad193f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of informal care on the mental health of caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间非正规护理对护理人员心理健康的影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Nov 29;45(4):e668-e676. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad193.
2
Family caregiving and changes in mental health status in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,日本的家庭护理与心理健康状况的变化。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Jan-Feb;98:104531. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104531. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
3
Gender Differences in Mental Health, Quality of Life, and Caregiver Burden among Informal Caregivers during the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Representative, Population-Based Study.德国第二波 COVID-19 大流行期间非正式照护者的心理健康、生活质量和照护者负担的性别差异:一项具有代表性的基于人群的研究。
Gerontology. 2023;69(2):149-162. doi: 10.1159/000523846. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
Caring in the time of COVID-19, longitudinal trends in well-being and mental health in carers in Ireland: Evidence from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA).在 COVID-19 期间的关爱:爱尔兰照顾者幸福感和心理健康的纵向趋势:来自爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究(TILDA)的证据。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Sep-Oct;102:104719. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104719. Epub 2022 May 10.
5
Does caring for others affect our mental health? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.照顾他人是否会影响我们的心理健康?来自 COVID-19 大流行的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;321:115721. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115721. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
6
Studying informal care during the pandemic: mental health, gender and job status.研究大流行期间的非正式护理:心理健康、性别和工作状况。
Econ Hum Biol. 2023 Aug;50:101245. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101245. Epub 2023 May 18.
7
Informal care in times of a public health crisis: Objective burden, subjective burden and quality of life of caregivers in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic.突发公共卫生危机时期的非正式照护:新冠疫情期间荷兰照护者的客观负担、主观负担和生活质量。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5515-e5526. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13975. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
8
Levels of Depression and Anxiety Among Informal Caregivers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study Based on the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.新冠肺炎疫情期间非正规照护者的抑郁和焦虑水平:基于加拿大老龄化纵向研究的一项研究。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Sep 1;77(9):1740-1757. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac035.
9
Mental and physical health changes around transitions into unpaid caregiving in the UK: a longitudinal, propensity score analysis.英国非带薪照护过渡期身心变化:纵向倾向评分分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Jan;9(1):e16-e25. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00206-2. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
10
Mental health and wellbeing among people with informal caring responsibilities across different time points during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based propensity score matching analysis.新冠肺炎大流行期间不同时间点具有非正式照护责任人群的精神健康和幸福感:基于人群的倾向评分匹配分析。
Perspect Public Health. 2023 Sep;143(5):275-284. doi: 10.1177/17579139221104973. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Working Carers in Europe and How Their Caring Responsibilities Impact Work-Family Life Conflict: Analysis of the European Quality of Life Survey.欧洲的在职照顾者及其照顾责任如何影响工作与家庭生活的冲突:欧洲生活质量调查分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 2;12(23):2415. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232415.
2
The roles of employment status and income in the mental health of informal caregivers in Germany.就业状况和收入在德国非正规照护者心理健康中的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2802. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20252-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Does caring for others affect our mental health? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.照顾他人是否会影响我们的心理健康?来自 COVID-19 大流行的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;321:115721. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115721. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
2
Precarious work and the covid-19 pandemic: the need for a gender equality focus.不稳定工作与新冠疫情:关注性别平等的必要性。
BMJ. 2023 Jan 30;380:e072872. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072872.
3
Longitudinal association between informal unpaid caregiving and mental health amongst working age adults in high-income OECD countries: A systematic review.
经合组织高收入国家工作年龄成年人中非正式无偿照料与心理健康之间的纵向关联:一项系统综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Nov 1;53:101711. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101711. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
COVID-19 and UK family carers: policy implications.COVID-19 与英国家庭照顾者:政策影响。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;8(10):929-936. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00206-6.
5
Tracking the mental health of home-carers during the first COVID-19 national lockdown: evidence from a nationally representative UK survey.追踪首次新冠全国封锁期间居家护理者的心理健康:来自英国全国代表性调查的证据。
Psychol Med. 2023 Feb;53(3):1096-1105. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002555. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
6
Mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: a latent class trajectory analysis using longitudinal UK data.心理健康对 COVID-19 大流行的反应:使用英国纵向数据的潜在类别轨迹分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;8(7):610-619. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00151-6. Epub 2021 May 6.
7
Gender differences in unpaid care work and psychological distress in the UK Covid-19 lockdown.英国新冠疫情封锁期间无薪护理工作与心理困扰方面的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247959. eCollection 2021.
8
Is the grass greener on the other side? The health impact of providing informal care in the UK and the Netherlands.“这山望着那山高”?英荷两国提供非正式护理对健康的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;269:113562. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113562. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
9
Risk of depression in family caregivers: unintended consequence of COVID-19.家庭照顾者患抑郁症的风险:新冠疫情的意外后果。
BJPsych Open. 2020 Oct 12;6(6):e119. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.99.
10
Reordering gender systems: can COVID-19 lead to improved gender equality and health?重新构建性别体系:新冠疫情能否推动性别平等与健康状况改善?
Lancet. 2020 Jul 11;396(10244):80-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31418-5. Epub 2020 Jun 19.