• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地方政府参与下室内氡减排的演化博弈分析

Evolutionary game analysis of indoor radon mitigation with local government involvement.

作者信息

Lin Dapeng, Zhuo Weihai, Yao Yupeng, Qiang Ziqi, Chen Bo

机构信息

School of Public Health, Fudan University, 130 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Institute of Radiation Medicine, Fudan University, 2094 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Sep 25;9(10):e20425. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20425. eCollection 2023 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20425
PMID:37790969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10543230/
Abstract

Radon is the second leading risk factor for lung cancer after smoking. As a public policy, radon mitigation not only involves radon control technology or its cost-benefit analysis, but also includes the decision-making process of local governments. In this study, the evolutionary game theory was used to analyse the interaction between local governments and residents based on the subsidy of the central government. Considering the practical data in China, factors influencing the behaviour of local governments and residents were discussed using numerical simulations. The results indicated that radon mitigation is a fully government-promoted action; thus, its implementation largely depends on the subsidy of the central government and the share of radon control costs borne by the local government. The financial burden for both local governments and residents is a more important determinant than long-term health effects. The relatively poor local economic situation could limit the implementation of radon control. There would be a public policy paradox wherein cities or regions with higher radon risk would have lower willingness for radon control, mainly due to the significantly higher costs of radon control. This work provides reference data for decision-making to implement radon control and is expected to offer some suggestions for local governments.

摘要

氡是仅次于吸烟的第二大肺癌风险因素。作为一项公共政策,氡减排不仅涉及氡控制技术或其成本效益分析,还包括地方政府的决策过程。在本研究中,运用演化博弈理论基于中央政府的补贴来分析地方政府与居民之间的相互作用。结合中国的实际数据,通过数值模拟讨论了影响地方政府和居民行为的因素。结果表明,氡减排是一项完全由政府推动的行动;因此,其实施在很大程度上取决于中央政府的补贴以及地方政府承担的氡控制成本份额。地方政府和居民的财政负担是比长期健康影响更重要的决定因素。相对较差的地方经济状况可能会限制氡控制的实施。会出现一种公共政策悖论,即氡风险较高的城市或地区对氡控制的意愿较低,主要是因为氡控制成本显著更高。这项工作为实施氡控制的决策提供了参考数据,并有望为地方政府提供一些建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/ee72e96bf47a/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/ba5bc5984e8e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/578143210506/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/fb830a68b38b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/c468dd1c5d69/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/a7b0d12818ba/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/e0774e1f5fab/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/ee72e96bf47a/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/ba5bc5984e8e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/578143210506/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/fb830a68b38b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/c468dd1c5d69/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/a7b0d12818ba/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/e0774e1f5fab/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb8/10543230/ee72e96bf47a/gr7.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolutionary game analysis of indoor radon mitigation with local government involvement.地方政府参与下室内氡减排的演化博弈分析
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 25;9(10):e20425. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20425. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
An evolutionary game analysis of governments' decision-making behaviors and factors influencing watershed ecological compensation in China.中国流域生态补偿中政府决策行为及影响因素的演化博弈分析
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 1;251:109592. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109592. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
3
Evolutionary game analysis on industrial pollution control of local government in China.中国地方政府工业污染控制的演化博弈分析。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 15;298:113499. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113499. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
Should local governments adopt dynamic subsidy mechanism to promote the development of green intelligent buildings? An evolutionary game analysis.地方政府是否应该采用动态补贴机制来促进绿色智能建筑的发展?基于演化博弈的分析。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:122060. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122060. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
A game-theoretic approach to promoting waste management within the framework of a circular economy: implications for environmental protection.一种基于循环经济框架的促进废物管理的博弈论方法:对环境保护的启示。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(5):6977-6991. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31532-2. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
6
Evolutionary game analysis between regional governments and shipping companies: Considering the impact of government subsidy on shipping companies.地区政府和航运公司之间的演化博弈分析:考虑政府补贴对航运公司的影响。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2024 Aug;205:116655. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116655. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
7
Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents' Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory.基于累积前景理论的政府与居民垃圾分类参与的演化博弈分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;19(21):14589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114589.
8
Government subsidy and benefit distribution mechanisms for transportation PPP projects: An evolutionary game perspective.交通 PPP 项目的政府补贴和利益分配机制:基于演化博弈的视角。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;359:120981. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120981. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
9
What Affects the Diffusion of New Energy Vehicles Financial Subsidy Policy? Evidence from Chinese Cities.新能源汽车财政补贴政策的扩散有何影响?来自中国城市的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 22;17(3):726. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030726.
10
How Do Government Policies Promote Green Housing Diffusion in China? A Complex Network Game Context.政府政策如何在中国推动绿色住房的普及?复杂网络博弈视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 16;19(4):2238. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042238.

本文引用的文献

1
Radon surveys and effectiveness of remedial actions in spas on the Ischia island (Italy).意大利伊斯基亚岛温泉浴场的氡气调查及补救措施的有效性
Appl Radiat Isot. 2022 Jul;185:110221. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110221. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
2
Medical expenditure for lung cancer in China: a multicenter, hospital-based retrospective survey.中国肺癌医疗支出:一项基于医院的多中心回顾性调查。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Aug 17;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00306-3.
3
Trends and risk factors of lung cancer in China.中国肺癌的趋势与风险因素。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2020 Dec 31;32(6):683-694. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.06.02.
4
Reanalysis of residential radon surveys in China from 1980 to 2019.对中国 1980 年至 2019 年住宅氡调查的再分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 25;757:143767. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143767. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
5
Radon Exposure and Neurodegenerative Disease.氡暴露与神经退行性疾病。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 13;17(20):7439. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207439.
6
An evolutionary game analysis of governments' decision-making behaviors and factors influencing watershed ecological compensation in China.中国流域生态补偿中政府决策行为及影响因素的演化博弈分析
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 1;251:109592. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109592. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
7
Radon exposure: a major cause of lung cancer.氡暴露:肺癌的主要成因。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2019 Sep;13(9):839-850. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2019.1645599. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
8
Estimates of the current and future burden of lung cancer attributable to residential radon exposure in Canada.加拿大住宅氡暴露导致的当前和未来肺癌负担估计。
Prev Med. 2019 May;122:100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.04.005.
9
Radon and lung cancer: What does the public really know?氡与肺癌:公众究竟了解多少?
J Environ Radioact. 2018 Dec;192:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
10
Global Estimate of Lung Cancer Mortality Attributable to Residential Radon.全球归因于住宅氡的肺癌死亡率估计。
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 May 31;126(5):057009. doi: 10.1289/EHP2503. eCollection 2018 May.