Suppr超能文献

谁在重症监护病房培训住院医师?对一所学术医疗中心跨专业教学的认知。

Who Is Teaching Residents in the Intensive Care Unit? Perceptions of Interprofessional Teaching at an Academic Medical Center.

作者信息

Petri Camille R, Beltran Christine P, Sullivan Amy M, Anandaiah Asha

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Shapiro Institute for Education and Research, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and.

出版信息

ATS Sch. 2023 Jul 25;4(3):320-331. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0008OC. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teamwork is essential for high-quality care in the intensive care unit (ICU). Interprofessional education has been widely endorsed as a way of promoting collaborative practice. Interprofessional providers (IPPs), including nurses, pharmacists, and respiratory therapists (RTs), routinely participate in multidisciplinary rounds in the ICU, but their role in teaching residents at academic medical centers has yet to be characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize perceptions of interprofessional teaching during and outside of rounds in the ICU.

METHODS

The authors conducted a cross-sectional survey of critical care physicians, internal medicine residents, nurses, pharmacists, and RTs across three ICUs at a tertiary academic medical center from September 2019 to March 2020. The frequency of different types of rounds contributions was rated on a Likert scale. Means and medians were compared across groups.

RESULTS

A total of 221 of 285 participants completed the survey (78% response rate). All IPPs described that they report data, provide clinical observations, and make recommendations frequently during ICU rounds, but teaching occurred infrequently (mean values, nurses = 2.9; pharmacists = 3.5; RTs = 3.7; 1 = not at all; 5 = always). Nurses were least likely to report teaching ( = 0.0017). From residents' and attendings' perspectives, pharmacists taught most frequently (mean values, 3.7 and 3.4, respectively). RTs self-report of teaching was higher than physicians' reports of RT teaching ( < 0.0001). Outside of rounds, residents reported a low frequency of teaching by nurses and RTs (means, nurses = 3.1; RTs = 3.1), but they reported a high rate of teaching by pharmacists (mean, 4.4).

CONCLUSION

Nonphysician IPPs routinely participate in ICU rounds but teach medical trainees infrequently. Physicians' perception of IPP teaching frequency was generally lower than self-reports by IPPs. Exploring modifiers of interprofessional teaching may enhance education and collaboration.

摘要

背景

团队合作对于重症监护病房(ICU)提供高质量护理至关重要。跨专业教育已被广泛认可为促进协作实践的一种方式。跨专业医疗服务提供者(IPPs),包括护士、药剂师和呼吸治疗师(RTs),经常参与ICU的多学科查房,但他们在学术医疗中心对住院医师教学中的作用尚未得到明确界定。

目的

明确ICU查房期间及查房之外对跨专业教学的看法。

方法

作者于2019年9月至2020年3月对一家三级学术医疗中心的三个ICU中的重症医学医师、内科住院医师、护士、药剂师和呼吸治疗师进行了横断面调查。不同类型查房贡献的频率采用李克特量表进行评分。对各组的均值和中位数进行比较。

结果

285名参与者中有221名完成了调查(回复率为78%)。所有跨专业医疗服务提供者均表示,他们在ICU查房期间经常汇报数据、提供临床观察结果并提出建议,但教学活动很少发生(均值,护士=2.9;药剂师=3.5;呼吸治疗师=3.7;1=完全没有;5=总是)。护士汇报教学的可能性最小(P=0.0017)。从住院医师和主治医生的角度来看,药剂师教学最为频繁(均值分别为3.7和3.4)。呼吸治疗师的自我教学汇报高于医生对呼吸治疗师教学的汇报(P<0.0001)。在查房之外,住院医师汇报护士和呼吸治疗师的教学频率较低(均值,护士=3.1;呼吸治疗师=3.1),但他们汇报药剂师的教学频率较高(均值为4.4)。

结论

非医生跨专业医疗服务提供者经常参与ICU查房,但很少对医学实习生进行教学。医生对跨专业医疗服务提供者教学频率的认知普遍低于跨专业医疗服务提供者的自我汇报。探索跨专业教学的影响因素可能会加强教育与协作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验