Polok Kamil, Fronczek Jakub, Putowski Zbigniew, Czok Marcelina, Guidet Bertrand, Jung Christian, de Lange Dylan, Leaver Susannah, Moreno Rui, Flatten Hans, Szczeklik Wojciech
Center for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Wrocławska 1-3, 30 - 901, Kraków, Poland.
Department of Pulmonology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Oct 5;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01191-0.
Little is known about the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in older critically ill adults. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of physiological disturbances in the six organ systems included in the SOFA score.
We analysed previously collected data from a prospective cohort study conducted between 2018 and 2019 in 22 countries. Consecutive patients ≥ 80 years old acutely admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) were eligible for inclusion. Patients were followed up for 30 days after admission to the ICU. We used logistic regression to study the association between increasing severity of organ dysfunction and mortality.
The median SOFA score among 3882 analysed patients was equal to 6 (IQR: 4-9). Mortality was equal to 26.1% (95% CI 24.7-27.5%) in the ICU and 38.7% (95% CI 37.1-40.2%) at day 30. Organ failure defined as a SOFA score ≥ 3 was associated with variable adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for ICU mortality dependant on the organ system affected: respiratory, 1.53 (95% CI 1.29-1.81); cardiovascular 1.69 (95% CI 1.43-2.01); hepatic, 1.74 (95% CI 0.97-3.15); renal, 1.87 (95% CI 1.48-2.35); central nervous system, 2.79 (95% CI 2.34-3.33); coagulation, 2.72 (95% CI 1.66-4.48). Modelling consecutive levels of organ dysfunction resulted in aORs equal to 0.57 (95% CI 0.33-1.00) when patients scored 2 points in the cardiovascular system and 1.01 (0.79-1.30) when the cardiovascular SOFA equalled 3.
Different components of the SOFA score have different prognostic implications for older critically ill adults. The cardiovascular component of the SOFA score requires revision.
关于序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在老年危重症患者中的表现知之甚少。我们旨在评估SOFA评分所包含的六个器官系统中生理紊乱的预后影响。
我们分析了先前在2018年至2019年期间于22个国家进行的一项前瞻性队列研究中收集的数据。年龄≥80岁且急性入住重症监护病房(ICU)的连续患者符合纳入条件。患者在入住ICU后随访30天。我们使用逻辑回归研究器官功能障碍严重程度增加与死亡率之间的关联。
在3882例分析患者中,SOFA评分中位数为6(四分位间距:4 - 9)。ICU死亡率为26.1%(95%置信区间24.7 - 27.5%),30天时为38.7%(95%置信区间37.1 - 40.2%)。定义为SOFA评分≥3的器官衰竭与因受影响器官系统而异的ICU死亡率调整比值比(aOR)相关:呼吸系统,1.53(95%置信区间1.29 - 1.81);心血管系统,1.69(95%置信区间1.43 - 2.01);肝脏,1.74(95%置信区间0.97 - 3.15);肾脏,1.87(95%置信区间1.48 - 2.35);中枢神经系统,2.79(95%置信区间2.34 - 3.33);凝血系统,2.72(95%置信区间1.66 - 4.48)。对连续的器官功能障碍水平进行建模,当患者心血管系统评分为2分时,aOR等于0.57(95%置信区间0.33 - 1.00),当心血管SOFA评分为3分时,aOR等于1.01(0.79 - 1.30)。
SOFA评分的不同组成部分对老年危重症患者具有不同的预后意义。SOFA评分的心血管部分需要修订。