Suppr超能文献

入住重症监护病房的80岁及以上急性入院患者中序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)总分的有效性:VIP2前瞻性国际队列研究的事后分析

Validity of the total SOFA score in patients ≥ 80 years old acutely admitted to intensive care units: a post-hoc analysis of the VIP2 prospective, international cohort study.

作者信息

Polok Kamil, Fronczek Jakub, Putowski Zbigniew, Czok Marcelina, Guidet Bertrand, Jung Christian, de Lange Dylan, Leaver Susannah, Moreno Rui, Flatten Hans, Szczeklik Wojciech

机构信息

Center for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Wrocławska 1-3, 30 - 901, Kraków, Poland.

Department of Pulmonology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Oct 5;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01191-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in older critically ill adults. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of physiological disturbances in the six organ systems included in the SOFA score.

METHODS

We analysed previously collected data from a prospective cohort study conducted between 2018 and 2019 in 22 countries. Consecutive patients ≥ 80 years old acutely admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) were eligible for inclusion. Patients were followed up for 30 days after admission to the ICU. We used logistic regression to study the association between increasing severity of organ dysfunction and mortality.

RESULTS

The median SOFA score among 3882 analysed patients was equal to 6 (IQR: 4-9). Mortality was equal to 26.1% (95% CI 24.7-27.5%) in the ICU and 38.7% (95% CI 37.1-40.2%) at day 30. Organ failure defined as a SOFA score ≥ 3 was associated with variable adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for ICU mortality dependant on the organ system affected: respiratory, 1.53 (95% CI 1.29-1.81); cardiovascular 1.69 (95% CI 1.43-2.01); hepatic, 1.74 (95% CI 0.97-3.15); renal, 1.87 (95% CI 1.48-2.35); central nervous system, 2.79 (95% CI 2.34-3.33); coagulation, 2.72 (95% CI 1.66-4.48). Modelling consecutive levels of organ dysfunction resulted in aORs equal to 0.57 (95% CI 0.33-1.00) when patients scored 2 points in the cardiovascular system and 1.01 (0.79-1.30) when the cardiovascular SOFA equalled 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Different components of the SOFA score have different prognostic implications for older critically ill adults. The cardiovascular component of the SOFA score requires revision.

摘要

背景

关于序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在老年危重症患者中的表现知之甚少。我们旨在评估SOFA评分所包含的六个器官系统中生理紊乱的预后影响。

方法

我们分析了先前在2018年至2019年期间于22个国家进行的一项前瞻性队列研究中收集的数据。年龄≥80岁且急性入住重症监护病房(ICU)的连续患者符合纳入条件。患者在入住ICU后随访30天。我们使用逻辑回归研究器官功能障碍严重程度增加与死亡率之间的关联。

结果

在3882例分析患者中,SOFA评分中位数为6(四分位间距:4 - 9)。ICU死亡率为26.1%(95%置信区间24.7 - 27.5%),30天时为38.7%(95%置信区间37.1 - 40.2%)。定义为SOFA评分≥3的器官衰竭与因受影响器官系统而异的ICU死亡率调整比值比(aOR)相关:呼吸系统,1.53(95%置信区间1.29 - 1.81);心血管系统,1.69(95%置信区间1.43 - 2.01);肝脏,1.74(95%置信区间0.97 - 3.15);肾脏,1.87(95%置信区间1.48 - 2.35);中枢神经系统,2.79(95%置信区间2.34 - 3.33);凝血系统,2.72(95%置信区间1.66 - 4.48)。对连续的器官功能障碍水平进行建模,当患者心血管系统评分为2分时,aOR等于0.57(95%置信区间0.33 - 1.00),当心血管SOFA评分为3分时,aOR等于1.01(0.79 - 1.30)。

结论

SOFA评分的不同组成部分对老年危重症患者具有不同的预后意义。SOFA评分的心血管部分需要修订。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8bd/10555975/b640f2b0452f/13613_2023_1191_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验