• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理研究中的交叉性:系统评价。

Intersectionality in nursing research: A systematic review.

机构信息

School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Göteborg, Sweden.

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg University, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7509-7527. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2021. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.2021
PMID:37798952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10643838/
Abstract

AIM

This systematic literature review aimed to identify, appraise and synthesize available research studies that apply intersectionality in nursing research.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Empirical and theoretical nursing studies published before February 2022 were identified from the PubMed and CINAHL databases. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they substantially covered the topics of intersectionality and nursing, had undergone peer-review, and were written in English.

REVIEW METHODS

The PRISMA 2020 statement for reporting systematic reviews was used to report findings. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of the included research studies.

RESULTS

Out of 331 identified studies, 60 studies were substantially about nursing and intersectionality, and were included in the review. There are a myriad of ways that the concept of intersectionality has been adopted in nursing research. Furthermore, there was great heterogeneity in the definition and application of the concept of intersectionality, and only a few studies were empirical.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for robust and clear framing of how the concept of intersectionality is defined and understood in nursing research. There is also a need for more empirical research effectively adopting the concept of intersectionality to enhance our understanding of how health inequities operate within the field of nursing.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patients, service users, caregivers or members of the public were involved in this work.

摘要

目的

本系统文献综述旨在识别、评价和综合现有应用于护理研究的交叉性研究。

设计

系统综述。

资料来源

从 PubMed 和 CINAHL 数据库中确定了 2022 年 2 月之前发表的实证和理论护理研究。如果研究实质性地涵盖了交叉性和护理的主题、经过同行评审且以英文撰写,则有资格纳入。

综述方法

采用 PRISMA 2020 声明报告系统评价结果。采用 Joanna Briggs 研究所批判性评估工具评估纳入研究的质量。

结果

在 331 项已确定的研究中,有 60 项研究主要涉及护理和交叉性,并纳入了综述。有许多方法可以在护理研究中采用交叉性的概念。此外,该概念的定义和应用存在很大的异质性,只有少数研究是实证研究。

结论

在护理研究中,需要明确和清晰地阐述交叉性概念的定义和理解方式。还需要更多实证研究有效地采用交叉性概念,以增进我们对护理领域中健康不平等现象是如何运作的理解。

无患者或公众贡献

这项工作没有涉及患者、服务使用者、护理人员或公众成员。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/469a/10643838/26c1edfa20e1/NOP2-10-7509-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/469a/10643838/26c1edfa20e1/NOP2-10-7509-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/469a/10643838/26c1edfa20e1/NOP2-10-7509-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Intersectionality in nursing research: A systematic review.护理研究中的交叉性:系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7509-7527. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2021. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
9
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
10
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.

引用本文的文献

1
The concept of intersectionality in bioethics: a systematic review.生物伦理学中的交叉性概念:系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 23;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01057-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping the Travels of Intersectionality Scholarship: A Citation Network Analysis.绘制交叉性学术研究的传播轨迹:一项引文网络分析
Psychol Women Q. 2020 Jun;44(2):151-169. doi: 10.1177/0361684320902408. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
2
Centering Black feminist thought in nursing praxis.将黑人女性主义思想置于护理实践的中心。
Nurs Inq. 2022 Jan;29(1):e12473. doi: 10.1111/nin.12473. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
3
Healthcare: action research with trans people living on the streets.医疗保健:与流浪街头的跨性别者一起进行行动研究。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Nov 10;75Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e20210016. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0016. eCollection 2021.
4
Adverse childhood experiences among previously homeless African American women.曾无家可归的非裔美国女性童年期不良经历
Public Health Nurs. 2022 Mar;39(2):446-455. doi: 10.1111/phn.12970. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
5
An integrative literature review and critical reflection of intersectionality theory.交叉性理论的综合文献综述与批判性反思
Nurs Inq. 2021 Dec;28(4):e12414. doi: 10.1111/nin.12414. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
The impact of intersectionality on nursing leadership, empowerment and culture: A case study exploring nurses and managers' perceptions in an acute care hospital in Aotearoa, New Zealand.交叉性对护理领导力、赋权和文化的影响:一项在新西兰奥克兰一家急症医院探索护士和管理人员看法的案例研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jul;30(13-14):1927-1941. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15745. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
8
The Concept of Vulnerability Among Black and Latina Transgender Women in the United States.
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2021;44(2):136-147. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000354.
9
A Historical Analysis of the Impact of Hegemonic Masculinities on Sexual Assault in the Lives of Ethnic Minority Women: Informing Nursing Interventions and Health Policy.霸权男性气质对少数民族妇女生活中性侵犯的影响的历史分析:为护理干预和卫生政策提供信息。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2021;44(1):66-88. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000333.
10
Evolving Intersectionality Within Public Health: From Analysis to Action.公共卫生领域中不断发展的交叉性:从分析到行动
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jan;111(1):88-90. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306031.