School of Physical Education and Sport Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.
Institute of Physical Education, Huanggang Normal University, Huanggang, China.
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 20;11:1194124. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1194124. eCollection 2023.
This study mainly used network meta-analysis to explore the effect of different types of exercise on hypertension in middle-aged and older adults.
Several databases (e.g., PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) were used to search for randomized controlled trials on the effects of different types of exercise on hypertension in middle-aged and older adults.
A total of 19 articles and 2,385 participants were included in the analysis. Aerobic exercise interventions [MD = -9.254, < 0.05, 95% CI (-14.810, -3.698)] and static exercise interventions [MD = -10.465, < 0.05, 95% CI (-18.135, -2.794)] had a significant effect on the improvement in systolic blood pressure (SBP). For diastolic blood pressure (DBP), aerobic exercise interventions [MD = -1.4096; > 0.05, 95% CI (-8.2395, 5.4201)] and static exercise interventions [MD = -4.5206, > 0.05, 95% CI (-14.0436, 5.0023)] were not statistically significant. The results of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) showed that static exercise improved hypertension better than aerobic exercise.
Aerobic exercise and static exercise have been shown to have a good effect on the improvement of hypertension, but the effect on DBP is not significant.
本研究主要采用网状meta 分析探讨不同类型运动对中老年高血压的影响。
检索PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆等数据库,查找关于不同类型运动对中老年高血压影响的随机对照试验。
共纳入 19 篇文献和 2385 名参与者。有氧运动干预[MD=-9.254, < 0.05,95%CI(-14.810,-3.698)]和静力运动干预[MD=-10.465, < 0.05,95%CI(-18.135,-2.794)]对收缩压(SBP)的改善有显著效果。对于舒张压(DBP),有氧运动干预[MD=-1.4096; > 0.05,95%CI(-8.2395,5.4201)]和静力运动干预[MD=-4.5206, > 0.05,95%CI(-14.0436,5.0023)]差异无统计学意义。累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)的结果表明,静力运动改善高血压的效果优于有氧运动。
有氧运动和静力运动均能较好地改善高血压,但对 DBP 的影响不显著。