• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们能否在不使用肺炎严重程度指数的情况下识别重症社区获得性肺炎?使用改良qSOFA联合降钙素原。

Can we recognize severe community-acquired pneumonia without pneumonia severity index? Use of modified qSOFA with procalcitonin.

作者信息

Güleç Tolgahan, Yılmaz Sarper, Ak Rohat, Tatlıparmak Ali Cankut, Karcıoğlu Özgür

机构信息

University of Health Sciences, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Adiyaman Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey.

University of Health Sciences, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Sep 9;9(9):e19937. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19937. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19937
PMID:37809503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10559344/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to analyze the diagnostic value of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), modified qSOFA, National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and NEWS + Lactate (NEWS + L) scores in the detection of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

This research is a retrospective cohort study. Patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) with the diagnosis of CAP were divided into severe and mild pneumonia regarding their Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) scores. The accuracies of lactate, procalcitonin (PCT) values, NEWS and qSOFA scores, as well as score combinations (NEWS + L and qSOFA + PCT) in predicting patients with severe CAP were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median qSOFA value in the severe CAP group (0 [IQR 0-1]) was found to be higher than median qSOFA value (0 [IQR 0-0]) in the mild CAP group (p < 0.001). The rate of qSOFA positivity (qSOFA ≥ 2) was significantly higher in the severe CAP group (17.1%, n = 21) compared to the mild CAP group (1.3%, n = 1) (p < 0.001). Median qSOFA + PCT for the severe CAP group (2 [IQR 1-2]) was higher than the mild CAP group (1 [IQR 0-1]) (p < 0.001). Mean NEWS score for severe CAP (4.95 ± 3.09) was found to be 1.69 (95% CI 0.92-2.46) higher than mean NEWS score of the mild CAP group (3.26 ± 2.39) (p < 0.001). The severe CAP NEWS + L score (6.97 ± 3.71) was higher than the mild CAP NEWS + L score (4.94 ± 2.48) (p < 0.001). Blood lactate level was not significant in the evaluation of severe CAP (p = 0.221). PCT (AUROC = 0.685 [95% CI 0.610-0.760]; p = 0.038), NEWS score (AUROC = 0.658 95% CI [0.582-0.733]; p < 0.001), qSOFA (AUROC = 0.686) were calculated to have adequate accuracy for the detection of severe CAP. [95% CI 0.613-0.759]; p = 0.037), NEWS + L score (AUROC = 0.665 [95% CI 0.589-0.740]; p = 0.038). The qSOFA + PCT score (AUROC = 0.758 [95% 0.691-0.825]; p = 0.034) was also found to be a highly accurate predictor of severe CAP.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found a combination of qSOFA and PCT to be the most reliable method of detecting severe CAP.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)、改良qSOFA、国家早期预警评分(NEWS)以及NEWS + 乳酸(NEWS + L)评分在检测重症社区获得性肺炎(CAP)中的诊断价值。

方法

本研究为回顾性队列研究。因CAP诊断入住急诊科(ED)的患者根据肺炎严重指数(PSI)评分分为重症肺炎和轻症肺炎两组。分析乳酸、降钙素原(PCT)值、NEWS和qSOFA评分以及评分组合(NEWS + L和qSOFA + PCT)预测重症CAP患者的准确性。

结果

发现重症CAP组的qSOFA中位数(0 [四分位间距0 - 1])高于轻症CAP组的qSOFA中位数(0 [四分位间距0 - 0])(p < 0.001)。重症CAP组的qSOFA阳性率(qSOFA≥2)(17.1%,n = 21)显著高于轻症CAP组(1.3%,n = 1)(p < 0.001)。重症CAP组的qSOFA + PCT中位数(2 [四分位间距1 - 2])高于轻症CAP组(1 [四分位间距0 - 1])(p < 0.001)。发现重症CAP的平均NEWS评分(4.95±3.09)比轻症CAP组的平均NEWS评分(3.26±2.39)高1.69(95%可信区间0.92 - 2.46)(p < 0.001)。重症CAP的NEWS + L评分(6.97±3.71)高于轻症CAP的NEWS + L评分(4.94±2.48)(p < 0.001)。血乳酸水平在评估重症CAP时无显著意义(p = 0.221)。计算得出PCT(曲线下面积=0.685 [95%可信区间0.

610 - 0.760];p = 0.038)、NEWS评分(曲线下面积=0.658 [95%可信区间0.582 - 0.733];p < 0.001)、qSOFA(曲线下面积=0.686 [95%可信区间

0.613 - 0.759];p = 0.037)、NEWS + L评分(曲线下面积=0.665 [95%可信区间0.589 - 0.740];p = 0.038)在检测重症CAP方面具有足够的准确性。qSOFA + PCT评分(曲线下面积=0.758 [95% 0.691 - 0.825];p = 0.034)也被发现是重症CAP的高度准确预测指标。

结论

在本研究中,我们发现qSOFA和PCT的组合是检测重症CAP最可靠的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b14/10559344/c4f73da7d497/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b14/10559344/c4f73da7d497/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b14/10559344/c4f73da7d497/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Can we recognize severe community-acquired pneumonia without pneumonia severity index? Use of modified qSOFA with procalcitonin.我们能否在不使用肺炎严重程度指数的情况下识别重症社区获得性肺炎?使用改良qSOFA联合降钙素原。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 9;9(9):e19937. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19937. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Outcome prediction value of National Early Warning Score in septic patients with community-acquired pneumonia in emergency department: A single-center retrospective cohort study.国家早期预警评分在急诊科社区获得性肺炎脓毒症患者中的预后预测价值:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
World J Emerg Med. 2020;11(4):206-215. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2020.04.002.
3
Risk stratification and prediction value of procalcitonin and clinical severity scores for community-acquired pneumonia in ED.降钙素原和临床严重程度评分对急诊科社区获得性肺炎的风险分层和预测价值。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;36(12):2155-2160. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.050. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
Prognostic Prediction Value of qSOFA, SOFA, and Admission Lactate in Septic Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Emergency Department.qSOFA、SOFA及入院时乳酸水平对急诊科社区获得性肺炎脓毒症患者的预后预测价值
Emerg Med Int. 2020 Apr 6;2020:7979353. doi: 10.1155/2020/7979353. eCollection 2020.
5
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population.比较不同评分系统对老年社区获得性肺炎患者死亡率和 ICU 入院率的预测作用。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Oct 28;16:1917-1929. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S335315. eCollection 2021.
6
Stratified and prognostic value of admission lactate and severity scores in patients with community-acquired pneumonia in emergency department: A single-center retrospective cohort study.急诊科社区获得性肺炎患者入院时乳酸水平及严重程度评分的分层与预后价值:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(41):e17479. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017479.
7
Efficacy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting clinical outcomes among community-acquired pneumonia patients presenting in the emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估在预测急诊科就诊的社区获得性肺炎患者临床结局中的疗效。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05044-0.
8
Efficacy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment with lactate concentration for predicting mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department.急诊科中应用乳酸浓度的快速序贯器官衰竭评估对社区获得性肺炎患者死亡率的预测效能
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;6(1):1-8. doi: 10.15441/ceem.17.262. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
9
Prognostic accuracy of using lactate in addition to the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and the National Early Warning Score for emergency department patients with suspected infection.对于急诊科疑似感染患者,除快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分和国家早期预警评分外,使用乳酸的预后准确性。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Jan;40(1):28-35. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211271. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
10
Early identification of severe community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective observational study.早期识别严重社区获得性肺炎:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Jun 5;6(1):e000438. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000438. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the predictive performance of PIRO score against six clinical prediction scores for COVID-19 outcomes in the emergency department.评估急诊科中PIRO评分对COVID-19结局的六种临床预测评分的预测性能。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13131-y.
2
Presepsin as a prognostic biomarker in COVID-19 patients: combining clinical scoring systems and laboratory inflammatory markers for outcome prediction.可溶性髓系细胞触发受体-1作为COVID-19患者的预后生物标志物:结合临床评分系统和实验室炎症标志物进行预后预测。
Virol J. 2024 Apr 26;21(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02367-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigation of the usability of the REMS, RAPS, and MPM II scoring systems in the prediction of short-term and long-term mortality in patients presenting to the emergency department triage.对REMS、RAPS和MPM II评分系统在预测急诊科分诊患者短期和长期死亡率方面的可用性进行调查。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Apr;192(2):907-913. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03063-1. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population.比较不同评分系统对老年社区获得性肺炎患者死亡率和 ICU 入院率的预测作用。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Oct 28;16:1917-1929. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S335315. eCollection 2021.
3
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.
拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
4
Community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎。
Lancet. 2021 Sep 4;398(10303):906-919. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00630-9.
5
National Early Warning Score (NEWS) as Prognostic Triage Tool for Septic Patients.国家早期预警评分(NEWS)作为脓毒症患者的预后分诊工具
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Oct 27;13:3843-3851. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S275390. eCollection 2020.
6
Epidemiology of community acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎的流行病学
Paediatr Child Health (Oxford). 2012 Jul;22(7):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.paed.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
7
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America.成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗。美国胸科学会和美国传染病学会的官方临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST.
8
Combining procalcitonin with the qSOFA and sepsis mortality prediction.将降钙素原与qSOFA及脓毒症死亡率预测相结合。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(23):e15981. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015981.
9
Lactate and NEWS-L are fair predictors of mortality in critically ill geriatric emergency department patients.乳酸和 NEWS-L 是危重症老年急诊患者死亡率的良好预测指标。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;38(2):217-221. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
10
Predicting in-hospital mortality in pneumonia-associated septic shock patients using a classification and regression tree: a nested cohort study.使用分类回归树预测肺炎相关性感染性休克患者的院内死亡率:一项巢式队列研究。
J Intensive Care. 2018 Oct 12;6:66. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0335-3. eCollection 2018.