• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循序渐进:步行对结肠镜检查结果影响的荟萃分析与系统评价

Step by Step: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review on the Impact of Walking on Colonoscopy Outcomes.

作者信息

Mohamed Islam, Abosheaishaa Hazem, George Sarah, Parekh Khushi, Henry Nina, Manek Suman, Baetje Lauren, Bhatia Mira, Jaber Fouad, Rahman Syed Hammad, Mahmoud Maya, Abboud Yazan, Dahiya Dushyant Singh, Duong Nikki, Hashimoto Yusuke

出版信息

Dig Dis. 2025 May 8:1-22. doi: 10.1159/000545844.

DOI:10.1159/000545844
PMID:40341303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12178582/
Abstract

Introduction Colorectal cancer screening relies on effective bowel preparation before a colonoscopy. Walking has emerged as a potential adjunct strategy to achieve bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. We investigated the efficacy of walking as a potential adjunct strategy to bowel preparation methods. Methods Our search encompassed Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Search results underwent screening utilizing Covidence based on predefined criteria. Data extraction performed by independent reviewers involved general characteristics, baseline patient characteristics, and outcome measures. Risk of Bias evaluation employed the RoB 2 tool for RCTs. Statistical analysis utilized RevMan v5.3, employing mean differences and random-effects models. Statistical significance was indicated by p-value < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed with I-square tests. Results Our meta-analysis included four RCTs with a total of 1218 patients. We found that walking did not yield a significant difference in total BPPS score compared to control groups. Walking led to statistically significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores. Walking did not significantly affect cecal intubation time or total procedure time. While there was no significant difference in the time to first diarrhea, the total number of diarrheal episodes was significantly impacted. Conclusion While walking did not significantly affect total BPPS scores, procedural timelines, or cecal intubation, it demonstrated significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores and diarrheal instances. These findings suggest that walking may have a beneficial effect on specific aspects of bowel preparation for colonoscopy, highlighting its potential as an adjunctive strategy in enhancing colonoscopy outcomes.

摘要

引言

结直肠癌筛查依赖于结肠镜检查前有效的肠道准备。步行已成为结肠镜检查前实现肠道清洁的一种潜在辅助策略。我们研究了步行作为肠道准备方法的潜在辅助策略的疗效。

方法

我们的检索涵盖了Embase、Medline、Cochrane和Scopus数据库。根据预定义标准,利用Covidence对检索结果进行筛选。由独立评审员进行的数据提取涉及一般特征、患者基线特征和结局指标。采用RoB 2工具对随机对照试验进行偏倚风险评估。统计分析使用RevMan v5.3,采用均值差和随机效应模型。p值<0.05表示具有统计学意义。采用I²检验评估异质性。

结果

我们的荟萃分析纳入了4项随机对照试验,共1218例患者。我们发现,与对照组相比,步行在总BPPS评分上没有显著差异。步行使升结肠、横结肠和降结肠的BPPS评分有统计学意义的改善。步行对盲肠插管时间或总操作时间没有显著影响。虽然首次腹泻时间没有显著差异,但腹泻发作的总数受到显著影响。

结论

虽然步行对总BPPS评分、操作时间或盲肠插管没有显著影响,但它在升结肠、横结肠和降结肠的BPPS评分以及腹泻情况方面有显著改善。这些发现表明,步行可能对结肠镜检查肠道准备的特定方面有有益影响,突出了其作为辅助策略改善结肠镜检查结果的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/a53f9b43a1cf/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/d6de889f99fa/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/a08e435e0284/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/1e2fa4127043/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/e38d83647cf4/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/991bf4342b9b/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/a53f9b43a1cf/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/d6de889f99fa/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/a08e435e0284/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/1e2fa4127043/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/e38d83647cf4/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/991bf4342b9b/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08dc/12178582/a53f9b43a1cf/ddi-2025-0000-0000-545844_F06.jpg

相似文献

1
Step by Step: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review on the Impact of Walking on Colonoscopy Outcomes.循序渐进:步行对结肠镜检查结果影响的荟萃分析与系统评价
Dig Dis. 2025 May 8:1-22. doi: 10.1159/000545844.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Water infusion versus air insufflation for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查中注水与注气的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 26;2015(5):CD009863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009863.pub2.
5
Physical activity for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.体力活动治疗肠易激综合征。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 29;6(6):CD011497. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011497.pub2.
6
Screening for prostate cancer.前列腺癌筛查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
Strategies for detecting colon cancer and/or dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.检测炎症性肠病患者结肠癌和/或发育异常的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD000279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000279.pub3.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Strategies for detecting colon cancer and/or dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.检测炎症性肠病患者结肠癌和/或发育异常的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD000279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000279.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of walking exercise on the bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a single blind randomized clinical trial study.步行锻炼对结肠镜检查前肠道准备的有效性:一项单盲随机临床试验研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 9;23(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02987-x.
2
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death.结肠镜筛查对结直肠癌发病风险和相关死亡的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 27;387(17):1547-1556. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208375. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
3
Effect of Walking Exercise and Intestinal Cleansing Interval on Bowel Preparation Quality, a Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.
步行锻炼和肠道清洁间隔对肠道准备质量的影响:一项单盲随机对照试验
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jan;68(1):193-201. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07526-4. Epub 2022 May 11.
4
Molecular Network of Colorectal Cancer and Current Therapeutic Options.结直肠癌的分子网络与当前治疗选择
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 6;12:852927. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.852927. eCollection 2022.
5
Cecal intubation time in screening colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查中的盲肠插管时间。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 14;100(19):e25927. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025927.
6
Colonoscopy in poorly prepped colons: a cost effectiveness analysis comparing standard of care to a new cleansing technology.肠道准备不佳的结肠的结肠镜检查:比较标准护理与一种新的清洁技术的成本效益分析。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Apr 29;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00277-5.
7
The importance of colonoscopy bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal lesions and colorectal cancer prevention.结肠镜检查肠道准备对于结直肠病变检测及预防结直肠癌的重要性。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 May;8(5):E673-E683. doi: 10.1055/a-1127-3144. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
8
Comparison of Effectiveness between Abdominal Vibration Stimulation and Walking Exercise for Bowel Cleansing before Therapeutic Colonoscopy.腹部振动刺激与步行运动在治疗性结肠镜检查前肠道清洁效果的比较。
Gut Liver. 2020 Jul 15;14(4):468-476. doi: 10.5009/gnl19999.
9
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
10
Effect of exercise on colorectal cancer prevention and treatment.运动对结直肠癌预防和治疗的影响。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 May 15;11(5):348-366. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i5.348.