Suppr超能文献

瑞马唑仑和瑞芬太尼与右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术的麻醉的回顾性比较研究。

A retrospective comparative study of anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ono-Higashi, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 10;13(1):17074. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43895-0.

Abstract

Remimazolam, an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, allows for rapid and reliable arousal. Rapid awakening using remimazolam may be beneficial in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as it allows rapid detection of neurologic deficits. The purpose of this study was to compare arousal time and outcomes between monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with remimazolam and remifentanil and conventional MAC with dexmedetomidine, propofol, and remifentanil. This study was a single center retrospective study. All TAVR cases performed under MAC (MAC-TAVR) at our institution between 2019 and 2021 were included. Patients were classified by anesthesia method into remimazolam and dexmedetomidine groups. Among 258 MAC-TAVR patients, 253 were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 76 patients were assigned to each group. The time from end of drug-administration to arousal [20.0 (16.0, 24.0) min vs. 38.5 (30.0, 56.3) min, p < 0.0001] and the time from attempted-arousal to arousal [1.0 (1.0, 1.0) min vs. 12.5 (3.0, 26.8) min, p < 0.0001] were significantly shorter in the remimazolam group. There was no significant difference in the length of ICU stay [2.0 (2.0, 2.0) days vs. 2.0 (2.0, 2.0) days, p = 0.157] and postoperative hospital stay [6.0 (4.0, 9.0) days vs. 5.0 (4.0, 8.0) days, p = 0.262].Trial registration: Clinical trial number: R03-123, Registry URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051635 Registration number: UMIN000045195, Principal investigator's name: Atsuhiro Kitaura, Date of registration: 20 August 2021.

摘要

瑞马唑仑是一种超短效苯二氮䓬类药物,可实现快速可靠的苏醒。在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中,快速唤醒使用瑞马唑仑可能有益,因为它可以快速发现神经功能缺陷。本研究旨在比较使用瑞马唑仑和瑞芬太尼的监测麻醉管理(MAC)与使用右美托咪定、丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的常规 MAC 的苏醒时间和结局。本研究为单中心回顾性研究。纳入 2019 年至 2021 年期间在我院接受 MAC(MAC-TAVR)的所有 TAVR 病例。根据麻醉方法将患者分为瑞马唑仑和右美托咪定组。在 258 例 MAC-TAVR 患者中,253 例被纳入研究。经过倾向评分匹配后,每组分配 76 例患者。从药物输注结束到苏醒的时间[20.0(16.0,24.0)min 比 38.5(30.0,56.3)min,p<0.0001]和从尝试苏醒到苏醒的时间[1.0(1.0,1.0)min 比 12.5(3.0,26.8)min,p<0.0001]在瑞马唑仑组明显更短。两组 ICU 入住时间[2.0(2.0,2.0)天比 2.0(2.0,2.0)天,p=0.157]和术后住院时间[6.0(4.0,9.0)天比 5.0(4.0,8.0)天,p=0.262]无显著差异。试验注册:临床试验编号:R03-123,注册网址:https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051635 注册号:UMIN000045195,主要研究者姓名:嘉藤敦久,注册日期:2021 年 8 月 20 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/409e/10564871/46a09c41bacc/41598_2023_43895_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验