• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对美国生物燃料政策导致的国内土地利用变化的综述。

A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy.

作者信息

Austin K G, Jones J P H, Clark C M

机构信息

RTI International, Center for Applied Economics and Strategy, 3040 E Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle, NC, 27709, USA.

US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington DC, 20460, USA.

出版信息

Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022 May;159:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112181.

DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112181
PMID:37818487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10563800/
Abstract

Estimates of land use change (LUC) attributable to the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) are critical for evaluation of the program's impacts on air and water quality, biodiversity, and soil quality. To improve our understanding of the range of published estimates, we reviewed 29 studies published since 2008 attributing domestic LUC to the RFS, updating previous comparisons and adding a growing number of empirical approaches to estimating biofuel-induced LUC. To identify principal reasons underlying differences in reported effects, we documented key attributes of studies' methods including spatial extent, time period, baseline scenario, policy influence, and LUC definitions. Across computable general equilibrium (CGE) and partial equilibrium (PE) economic simulation model studies we found a range of 0.01-2.45 million acres of net cropland expansion per billion-gallon increase in biofuels. Empirical approaches reporting national-scale estimates fall within this range, reporting 0.38-0.66 million acres per billion-gallon increase. Empirical studies had a much smaller range of estimates and were closer to PE approaches than CGE. Studies generally did not represent all the potential drivers of biofuel production, and instead reported projections reflecting a combination of RFS impacts and other influences. Additional refinements to the modeling and empirical approaches reviewed in this study can further improve our understanding of the land use change driven by biofuels and the RFS Program.

摘要

估算美国可再生燃料标准(RFS)导致的土地利用变化(LUC)对于评估该计划对空气质量、水质、生物多样性和土壤质量的影响至关重要。为了更好地理解已发表估算值的范围,我们回顾了2008年以来发表的29项将国内土地利用变化归因于可再生燃料标准的研究,更新了之前的比较,并增加了越来越多估算生物燃料引发的土地利用变化的实证方法。为了确定报告结果差异背后的主要原因,我们记录了研究方法的关键属性,包括空间范围、时间段、基准情景、政策影响和土地利用变化的定义。在可计算一般均衡(CGE)和局部均衡(PE)经济模拟模型研究中,我们发现,每增加10亿加仑生物燃料,净耕地扩张范围在1万英亩至245万英亩之间。报告全国范围估算值的实证方法也在此范围内,即每增加10亿加仑生物燃料,净耕地扩张038万英亩至066万英亩。实证研究的估算范围要小得多,且比可计算一般均衡方法更接近局部均衡方法。研究通常并未涵盖生物燃料生产的所有潜在驱动因素,而是报告了反映可再生燃料标准影响和其他影响综合作用的预测结果。本研究中对建模和实证方法的进一步完善,可以进一步加深我们对生物燃料和可再生燃料标准计划驱动的土地利用变化的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8575/10563800/6c205bcb85d2/nihms-1879585-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8575/10563800/9d0908330dc8/nihms-1879585-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8575/10563800/52ddc2bd49bc/nihms-1879585-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8575/10563800/61dcb4b33977/nihms-1879585-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8575/10563800/6c205bcb85d2/nihms-1879585-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8575/10563800/9d0908330dc8/nihms-1879585-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8575/10563800/52ddc2bd49bc/nihms-1879585-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8575/10563800/61dcb4b33977/nihms-1879585-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8575/10563800/6c205bcb85d2/nihms-1879585-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy.对美国生物燃料政策导致的国内土地利用变化的综述。
Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022 May;159:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112181.
2
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol.耕地利用变化和玉米及纤维素乙醇的温室气体排放。
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Apr 10;6(1):51. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-51.
4
US biofuel production and policy: implications for land use changes in Malaysia and Indonesia.美国生物燃料生产与政策:对马来西亚和印度尼西亚土地利用变化的影响
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020 Jan 18;13:11. doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-1650-1. eCollection 2020.
5
Water impacts of U.S. biofuels: Insights from an assessment combining economic and biophysical models.美国生物燃料的水资源影响:经济和生物物理模型综合评估的见解。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 28;13(9):e0204298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204298. eCollection 2018.
6
A spatial modeling framework to evaluate domestic biofuel-induced potential land use changes and emissions.评估国内生物燃料引起的潜在土地利用变化和排放的空间建模框架。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Feb 18;48(4):2488-96. doi: 10.1021/es404546r. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
7
Land use effects of biofuel production in the US.美国生物燃料生产的土地利用影响。
Environ Res Commun. 2023 May 12;5:055007. doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/acd1d7.
8
Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard.美国可再生燃料标准的环境影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 1;119(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101084119.
9
Biofuels that cause land-use change may have much larger non-GHG air quality emissions than fossil fuels.生物燃料引起土地利用变化可能会产生比化石燃料大得多的非温室气体空气质量排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Oct 2;46(19):10835-41. doi: 10.1021/es301851x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
10
Estimated attribution of the RFS Program on soybean biodiesel in the U.S. using the Bioenergy Scenario Model.使用生物能源情景模型对美国可再生燃料标准计划(RFS Program)在大豆生物柴油方面的估计归因。
Energy Policy. 2024 Sep;192. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114250.

引用本文的文献

1
Ecologically informed solar enables a sustainable energy transition in US croplands.生态智慧型太阳能助力美国农田实现可持续能源转型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 29;122(17):e2501605122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2501605122. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Land use effects of biofuel production in the US.美国生物燃料生产的土地利用影响。
Environ Res Commun. 2023 May 12;5:055007. doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/acd1d7.
3
Estimated attribution of the RFS Program on soybean biodiesel in the U.S. using the Bioenergy Scenario Model.使用生物能源情景模型对美国可再生燃料标准计划(RFS Program)在大豆生物柴油方面的估计归因。

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard.美国可再生燃料标准的环境影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 1;119(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101084119.
2
Estimating induced land use change emissions for sustainable aviation biofuel pathways.估算可持续航空生物燃料途径的引致土地使用变化排放量。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 20;779:146238. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146238. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Using satellite imagery to understand and promote sustainable development.利用卫星图像来理解和促进可持续发展。
Energy Policy. 2024 Sep;192. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114250.
4
Reply to Falconi et al.: Economic red herrings and resistance to new modeling hinder progress in assessing ethanol's land use change.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 20;119(51):e2216091119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216091119. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
5
Mechanism of Response of Watershed Water Quality to Agriculture Land-Use Changes in a Typical Fuel Ethanol Raw Material Planting Area-A Case Study on Guangxi Province, China.流域水质对典型燃料乙醇原料种植区农业土地利用变化的响应机制——以中国广西为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 26;19(11):6499. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116499.
Science. 2021 Mar 19;371(6535). doi: 10.1126/science.abe8628.
4
Water Quality Effects of Economically Viable Land Use Change in the Mississippi River Basin under the Renewable Fuel Standard.可再生燃料标准下密西西比河流域经济可行的土地利用变化对水质的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Feb 2;55(3):1566-1575. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04358. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
SWIFT-Active Screener: Accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation.SWIFT-Active Screener:通过主动学习和集成召回估计实现加速文档筛选。
Environ Int. 2020 May;138:105623. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105623. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
6
Rapid Crop Cover Mapping for the Conterminous United States.美国本土的快速作物覆盖制图。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 5;8(1):8631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26284-w.
7
The impact of considering land intensification and updated data on biofuels land use change and emissions estimates.考虑土地集约化和更新数据对生物燃料土地利用变化及排放估算的影响。
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 Jul 20;10:191. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0877-y. eCollection 2017.
8
Reviewing the research methods literature: principles and strategies illustrated by a systematic overview of sampling in qualitative research.回顾研究方法文献:以定性研究抽样的系统概述为例阐述的原则与策略
Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 11;5(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0343-0.
9
Carbon accounting and economic model uncertainty of emissions from biofuels-induced land use change.生物燃料引起的土地利用变化排放的碳核算和经济模型不确定性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Mar 3;49(5):2656-64. doi: 10.1021/es505481d. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
10
A spatial modeling framework to evaluate domestic biofuel-induced potential land use changes and emissions.评估国内生物燃料引起的潜在土地利用变化和排放的空间建模框架。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Feb 18;48(4):2488-96. doi: 10.1021/es404546r. Epub 2014 Feb 6.