• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别痴呆症护理中的风险:来自与临床药剂师的定性研究的见解。

Identifying risks in dementia care: Insights from a qualitative study with clinical pharmacists.

作者信息

Burnand Alice, Kantilal Kumud, Woodward Abi, Bhanu Cini, Manthorpe Jill, Orlu Mine, Rait Greta, Samsi Kritika, Sampson Liz, Vickerstaff Victoria, Wilcock Jane, Jani Yogini, Davies Nathan

机构信息

Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, QMUL, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0325472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325472. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325472
PMID:40554526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12186929/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

People with dementia experience complex healthcare needs. Clinical pharmacists play a crucial role in optimising medication management and ensuring patient safety within the primary care setting. However, little is known about the specific barriers and challenges they face when delivering dementia care. This study investigates the safety of dementia care in the community, focusing on the experiences of clinical pharmacists.

METHODS

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with clinical pharmacists. Data analysis employed codebook thematic analysis, guided by the SEIPS 2.0 framework.

RESULTS

Thirteen clinical pharmacists were interviewed. Key risks include variations in pharmacist expertise, communication barriers, limited resources, and systemic challenges. Using the SEIPS 2.0 framework, the complex interactions between work systems (people, tools, tasks, organisation and environment) and work processes were identified, which impact safety outcomes for both clinical pharmacists and people with dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

Interviews revealed a spectrum of risks associated with dementia care in primary care. This study highlights the complex interplay of factors influencing the safety of dementia care. A proactive, multifaceted approach addressing training, interprofessional collaboration, and system-level adaptations is crucial to mitigate these risks and enhance patient safety in dementia care.

摘要

引言

患有痴呆症的人有复杂的医疗保健需求。临床药剂师在优化药物管理和确保初级保健环境中的患者安全方面发挥着关键作用。然而,对于他们在提供痴呆症护理时所面临的具体障碍和挑战知之甚少。本研究调查社区中痴呆症护理的安全性,重点关注临床药剂师的经验。

方法

采用对临床药剂师进行半结构化访谈的定性研究。数据分析采用码本主题分析,以SEIPS 2.0框架为指导。

结果

对13名临床药剂师进行了访谈。主要风险包括药剂师专业知识的差异、沟通障碍、资源有限和系统性挑战。使用SEIPS 2.0框架,确定了工作系统(人员、工具、任务、组织和环境)与工作流程之间的复杂相互作用,这对临床药剂师和痴呆症患者的安全结果都有影响。

结论

访谈揭示了初级保健中与痴呆症护理相关的一系列风险。本研究强调了影响痴呆症护理安全的因素之间的复杂相互作用。采取积极主动、多方面的方法来解决培训、跨专业协作和系统层面的调整问题,对于降低这些风险和提高痴呆症护理中的患者安全至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52c/12186929/3c007eaff829/pone.0325472.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52c/12186929/db6296f97f7a/pone.0325472.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52c/12186929/3c007eaff829/pone.0325472.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52c/12186929/db6296f97f7a/pone.0325472.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e52c/12186929/3c007eaff829/pone.0325472.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying risks in dementia care: Insights from a qualitative study with clinical pharmacists.识别痴呆症护理中的风险:来自与临床药剂师的定性研究的见解。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0325472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325472. eCollection 2025.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
4
A qualitative systematic review of the role of families in supporting communication in people with dementia.一项关于家庭在支持痴呆症患者沟通方面作用的定性系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Sep;57(5):1130-1153. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12738. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
5
Pain Assessment and Management in Dementia Care: Qualitative Perspectives of People With Dementia, Their Families, and Healthcare Professionals.痴呆症护理中的疼痛评估与管理:痴呆症患者、其家人及医护人员的定性观点
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(7):2933-2947. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17771. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
6
Understanding and Overcoming Negative Attitudes That Hinder Adoption of Reablement in Dementia Care: An Explorative Qualitative Study.理解并克服阻碍痴呆症护理中采用康复护理的消极态度:一项探索性定性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 12;18:3411-3422. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S522515. eCollection 2025.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Acceptability of 'as needed' biologic therapy in psoriasis: insights from a multistakeholder mixed-methods study.“按需”生物疗法治疗银屑病的可接受性:来自多方利益相关者混合方法研究的见解。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jul 16;191(2):243-251. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae068.
9
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10
A qualitative interview study exploring patients' views and experiences of treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa in the UK.一项定性访谈研究,探讨英国化脓性汗腺炎患者对治疗的看法和经历。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):85-92. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf046.

本文引用的文献

1
Service delivery and the role of clinical pharmacists in UK primary care for older people, including people with dementia: a scoping review.英国初级医疗保健中针对老年人(包括痴呆症患者)的服务提供及临床药师的作用:一项范围综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jan 14;26(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02685-x.
2
Adoption of clinical pharmacist roles in primary care: longitudinal evidence from English general practice.基层医疗中临床药师角色的采用:来自英国全科医疗的纵向证据。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Feb 27;75(752):e173-e180. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0320. Print 2025 Mar.
3
Best practice in dementia health care: Key clinical practice pointers from a national conference and innovative opportunities for pharmacy practice.
痴呆症医疗保健的最佳实践:全国会议的关键临床实践要点和药学实践的创新机会。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Oct;20(10):1014-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.07.005. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
4
Collaborative discussions between GPs and pharmacists to optimise patient medication: a qualitative study within a UK primary care clinical trial.全科医生和药剂师合作优化患者用药:英国一项初级保健临床试验中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Oct 31;74(748):e727-e734. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0190. Print 2024 Nov.
5
Hospital nurses perceived challenges and opportunities in the care of people with dementia: A mixed-methods systematic review.医院护士在痴呆症患者护理方面的挑战和机遇:一项混合方法系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(8):2849-2884. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17144. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
6
What happens when pharmacist independent prescribers lead on medicine management in older people's care homes: a qualitative study.当药剂师独立开方者主导老年人护理院的药物管理时会发生什么:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 31;13(10):e068678. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068678.
7
Factors Important to Older Adults Who Disagree With a Deprescribing Recommendation.对不同意药物减量建议的老年人来说很重要的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2337281. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37281.
8
A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research.医疗保健中的弹性管理视角:框架和未来研究途径。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 19;23(1):774. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09701-3.
9
Understanding the medication safety challenges for patients with mental illness in primary care: a scoping review.理解初级保健中精神疾病患者的用药安全挑战:范围综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 12;23(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04850-5.
10
Engaging patients in patient safety: a qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers' perspectives.让患者参与患者安全:一项关于医疗管理者和提供者观点的定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 29;21(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01152-1.